Evaluation of Load Transfer in the Cellulosic-Fiber/Polymer Interphase Using a Micro-Raman Tensile Test
Keywords:
Raman spectroscopy, micromechanical test, cellulose fibers, polymer, interphase, load transfer, adhesion, silaneAbstract
The objectives of this research were (1) to use a Raman micro-spectroscopic technique to determine the tensile stress distributions of a cellulosic-fiber/polymer droplet interphase, and (2) to examine if the stress profile could be used to evaluate load transfer in fiber/polymer adhesion. Cellulosic fibers were treated with various silanes (amino, phenylamino, phenyl, and octadecyl functionalities) and a styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer to create different interphases upon bonding with polystyrene. A single fiber, bonded with a micro-droplet of polystyrene in the mid-span region of its gage length, was strained in tension. Raman spectra were collected at five-micrometer intervals along the embedded region of the fiber. The stress-dependent peak of cellulose (895 cm-1) was analyzed for frequency shift so that the local tensile stress in the interface region could be determined. Results showed that the local tensile stresses of the strained fiber were lower in the embedded region compared to the exposed region, suggesting a transfer of load from the fiber to the matrix polymer. A deeper and sharper decline of the stress profile was observed when the fiber/droplet interaction was enhanced. Further analyses, involving conversion of tensile stress profiles to shear stress distributions in the interphase, confirmed that the micro-Raman/tensile test can be employed to evaluate fiber/matrix interfacial bonding in composites. This success signifies the possibility of evaluating adhesion between cellulosic fibers and brittle polymers, which is difficult to study using common micromechanical tests. Use of the micro-Raman technique can improve our understanding of wood/polymer adhesion.References
Defosse, M. 1999. Processors focus on differentiation in window profiles. Modern Plastics Sept.:74-79.nEgan, A., and S. M. Shaler. 2000. Fracture and mechanics of fracture for resin coated single wood fibers. Pages 95-103 in G. Hague, M. McLauchlin, and T. Skinner, eds. Proc. Fourth European Panel Products Symposium, October 11-13, 2000, Llandudno, UK. The Biocomposites Centre, Bangor, UK.nEichhorn, S. J., and R. J. Young. 2003. Deformation micromechanics of natural cellulose fibre networks and composites. Comp. Sci. Technol.63:1225-1230.nEichhorn, S. J., and R. J. Young. 2004. Composite micromechanics of hemp fibres and epoxy resin microdroplets. Comp. Sci. Technol.64:767-772.nEichhorn, S. J., M. Hugues, R. Snell, and L. Mott. 2000. Strain induced shifts in the Raman spectra of natural cellulose fibers. J. Mater. Sci. Lett.19:721-723.nEichhorn, S. J., R. J. Young, and W.-Y. Yeh. 2001. Deformation processes in regenerated cellulose fibers. Text. Res. J.71(2):121-129.nFan, C. F., D. A. Waldman, and S. L. Hsu. 1991. Interfacial effects on stress distribution in model composites. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys.29:235-246.nFranko, A., K. C. Seavey, J. Gumaer, and W. G. Glasser. 2001. Continuous cellulose fiber-reinforced cellulose ester composites III. Commercial matrix and fiber option. Cellulose8:171-179.nGaur, U., and B. Miller. 1989. Microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface: Evaluation of experimental parameters. Comp. Sci. Technol.34:35-51.nGu, X., and R. J. Young. 1997. Deformation micromechanics in model carbon fiber reinforced composites. Part II. The microbond test. Text. Res. J.67(2):93-100.nHerrera-Franco, P. J., and L. T. Drzal. 1992. Comparison of methods for the measurement of fiber/matrix adhesion in composites. Composites23:2-27.nHoecker, F., and J. Karger-Kocsis. 1996. Surface energetics of carbon fibers and its effects on the mechanical performance of CF/EP composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.59:139-153.nLiu, P. F. 1994. Characterizing interfacial adhesion between wood fibers and a thermoplastic matrix. Ph.D. dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. 170 pp.nLiu, P. F., T. G. Rials, M. P. Wolcott, and D. J. Gardner. 1996. Interactions between wood fibers and amorphous polymers. Pages 74-81 in Proc. Woodfiber-Plastic Composites: Virgin and recycled wood fiber and polymers for composites, May 1-3, 1995, Madison, WI. Forest Prod. Soc., Madison, WI.nMercado, J. 1992. Using digital image analysis to determine the reinforcement of wood fiber polyurethane composites. MS. Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI. 71 pp.nMott, L., S. M. Shaler, and L. H. Groom. 1996. A technique to measure strain distributions in single wood pulp fibers. Wood Fiber Sci.28(4):429-437.nSears, K. D., R. Jacobson, D. F. Caulfield, and J. Underwood. 2002. Reinforcement of engineering thermoplastics with high purity wood cellulose fibers. Pages 27-34 in Proc. Sixth International Conference on Woodfiber-Plastic Composites, May 15-16, 2001, Madison, WI, Forest Prod. Soc., Madison WI.nSmith, P. M. 2001. U.S. woodfiber-plastic composite decking market. Pages 13-17 in Proc. Sixth International Conference on Woodfiber-Plastic Composites, May 15-16, 2001, Madison, WI. Forest Prod. Soc., Madison WI.nTrejo-O'Reilly, J. A., J. Y. Cavaillé, M. Paillet, A. Gandini, P. Herrera-Franco, and J. Cauich. 2000. Interfacial properties of regenerated cellulose fiber/polystyrene composite materials. Effect of the coupling agent's structure on the micromechanical behavior. Polym. Compos.21(1):65-71.nTze, W. T. Y. 2003. Effects of fiber/matrix interactions on the interfacial deformation micromechanics of cellulosefiber/polymer composites. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maine, Orono, ME. 191 pp.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
