Use of Gadolinium Chloride as A Contrast Agent for Imaging Spruce Knots by Magnetic Resonance

Authors

  • Thomas L. Eberhardt
  • Chi-Leung So
  • Amy H. Herlihy
  • Po-Wah So

Keywords:

Compression wood, contrast agent, extractives, ion exchange, knots, magnetic resonance imaging, softwood, spruce, wood

Abstract

Treatments of knot-containing spruce wood blocks with a paramagnetic salt, gadolinium (III) chloride, in combination with solvent pretreatments, were evaluated as strategies to enhance the visualization of wood features by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Initial experiments with clear wood and excised knot samples showed differences in moisture uptake after pretreatments with selected solvents. For knot-containing spruce wood blocks, increased detail in the images with an ethanol pretreatment was attributed to the removal of extractives thereby resulting in higher moisture contents for the knot wood. Incorporation of the gadolinium-based contrast agent resulted in an abrupt loss in signal for a zone around each knot. Accordingly, the retention of gadolinium ions appears to be selective, thereby allowing the demarcation of what is likely to be compression wood known to surround softwood knots. Applications include studies on wood anatomy by MRI and the modeling of wood defects. The treatment of wood with contrast agents as such also shows promise as a technique to improve our understanding of the localization of different cell-wall chemistries, especially as they relate to ion exchange capacity.

References

Ahvazi, B., and D. S. Argyropoulos. 2000. Proton spinlattice relaxation time measurements of solid wood and its constituents as a function of pH: Part I. Wood Sci. Technol.34(1):45-53.nAraujo, C. D., A. L. MacKay, J. R. T. Hailey, and K. P. Whittall. 1992. Proton magnetic resonance techniques for characterization of water in wood: Application to white spruce. Wood Sci. Technol.26(2):101-113.nBucur, V. 2003. Techniques for high resolution imaging of wood structure: A review. Meas. Sci. Technol.14(12):R91-R98.nChang, S. J., J. R. Olson, and P. C. Wang. 1989. NMR imaging of internal features in wood. Forest Prod. J.39(6):43-49.nCoates, E. R., S. J. Chang, and T. W. Liao. 1998. A quick defect detection algorithm for magnetic resonance images of hardwood logs. Forest Prod. J.48(10):68-74.nDawson-Andoh, B. E., J. M. Halloin, T. G. Cooper, D. P. Kamdem, and E. J. Potchen. 2001. Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential tool in the study of wood penetration by waterborne preservative systems. Wood Fiber Sci.33(1):84-89.nFlibotte, S., R. S. Menon, A. L. MacKay, and J. R. T. Hailey. 1990. Proton magnetic resonance of western red cedar. Wood Fiber Sci.22(4):362-376.nIlvonen, K., L. Palva, M. Peramaki, R. Joensuu, and R. Sepponen. 2001. MRI-based D2O/H2O-contrast method to study water flow and distribution in heterogeneous systems: Demonstration in wood xylem. J. Magn. Reson.149(1):36-44.nLabbe, N., B. De Jeso, J.-C. Lartigue, G. Daude, M. Petraud, and M. Ratier. 2002. Moisture content and extractive materials in maritime pine wood by low field 1H NMR. Holzforschung56(1):25-31.nMarin J., and J. Ayele. 2002. Removal of some heavy metal cations from aqueous solution by spruce sawdust. I. Study of the binding mechanism through batch experiments. Environ. Technol.23(10):1157-1171.nMeder, R., S. L. Codd, R. A. Franich, P. T. Callaghan, and J. M. Pope. 2003. Observation of anisotropic water movement in Pinus radiata D. Don sapwood above fiber saturation using magnetic resonance micro-imaging. Holz Roh-Werkst.61(4):251-256.nMuller, U., R. Bammer, E. Halmschlager, R. Stollberger, and R. Wimmer. 2001. Detection of fungal wood decay using magnetic resonance imaging. Holz Roh- Werkst.59(3):190-194.nMuller, U., R. Bammer, and A. Teischinger. 2002. Detection of incipient fungal attack in wood using magnetic resonance parameter mapping. Holzforschung56(5):529-534.nSahlberg, U. 1995. Influence of knot fibers on TMP properties. Tappi J.78(5):162-168.nShukla, A., Y.-H. Zhang, P. Dubey, J. L. Margrave, and S. S. Shukla. 2002. The role of sawdust in the removal of unwanted materials from water. J. Hazard. Mater.95(1-2):137-152.nStamm, A. J. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. The Ronald Press Company, New York, NY. 549 pp.nTimell, T. E. 1986. Compression wood in gymnosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 2150 pp.nToth, E., L. Helm, and A. E. Merbach. 2002. Relaxivity of MRI contrast agents. Pages 62-64 in W. Krause, ed. Contrast agents I, Magnetic resonance imaging, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.nvon Wedel, K. W., B. J. Zobel, and C. J. A. Shelbourne. 1968. Prevalence and effects of knots in young loblolly pine. Forest Prod. J.18(9):97-103.nWang, P. C., and S. J. Chang. 1986. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of wood. Wood Fiber Sci.18(2):308-314.nWillfor, S., J. Hemming, M. Reunanen, C. Eckerman, and B. Holmbom. 2003a. Lignans and lipophilic extractives in Norway spruce knots and stemwood. Holzforschung57(1):27-36.nWillfor, S., J. Hemming, M. Reunanen, and B. Holmbom. 2003b. Phenolic and lipophilic extractives in scots pine knots and stemwood. Holzforschung57(4):359-372.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions