Theoretical Modeling of Bonding Characteristics and Performance of Wood Composites. Part I. Inter-Element Contact

Authors

  • Chunping Dai
  • Changming Yu
  • Cheng Zhou

Keywords:

Wood composites, modeling, simulation, relative contact area, consolidation, formation, bonding

Abstract

This is the first of a four-paper series aiming to model fundamental bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. In this paper, a mathematical model and a computer simulation model are developed to predict the variation of inter-element (strand) contact during mat consolidation. The mathematical predictions and the computer simulations agree well with each other. The results show that the relationship between the inter-element contact and the mat density is highly nonlinear and is significantly affected by the wood density and the element thickness. The effects of the element length and width are less significant. The models imply that use of less dense wood species and thinner strands are beneficial to lower product density while achieving adequate inter-element contact for bonding.

References

Dai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1993. Compression behaviour of randomly-formed wood flake mats. Wood Fiber Sci.25(4): 349-358.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1994. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part III. Modelling and simulation of a random multilayered flake mat. Wood Sci. Technol.28(3): 229-239.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1997. On horizontal density variations in randomly-formed short-fibre wood composite boards. Composites Part A.28(A): 57-64.nDai, C., S. Chen, and A. Pielasch. 1996. Simulation of mat formation for strand composites processing. Pages 32-39 in Proc. 3rd Pacific Rim Bio-based Composites Symposium, Kyoto, Japan.nDai, C., P. Hubert, and S. Chen. 1997. Advances in modeling mat formation and consolidation for wood composite panels. Pages 21-27 in Proc. First European Panel Products Symposium, Llandudno, UK.nDai, C., C. Mei, and H. Korai. 2002. Density and property relationships of wood strand composites. Pages 458-466 in Proc. 6th Pacific Rim Bio-based Composites Symposium, Portland, OR.nDai, C., C. Yu, and X. Zhou. 2005. Heat and mass transfer in wood composite panels during hot pressing: Part 2. Modeling void formation and mat permeability. Wood Fiber Sci.37(2): 242-257.nHumphrey, P. E., and S. Ren. 1989. Bonding kinetics of thermosetting adhesive system used in wood-based composites: the combined effect of temperature and moisture J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.3(5):397-413.nKelly, M. 1977. Critical review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. USDA General Technical Report FPL-10. Forest Products Lab, Madison, WI.nMeinecke, E., and W. Klauditz. 1962. Physics and technology of bonding in particleboard production. Research report of North Rhine Westfalia #1053. Westdeautscher Verlag, Colognne and Opladen (Translated from German by Israel Program for Scientific Translations in 1968). 81 pp.nSmith, G. D. 2003. The lap-shear strength of droplets arrays of a PF-resin on OSB strands. Forest Prod. J.53 (11/12): 1-7.nSuchsland, O., and H. Xu. 1989. A simulation of the horizontal density distribution in a flakeboard. Forest Prod. J.39(5): 29-33.nWang, S., and C. Dai. 2004. Press control for optimized wood composite processing and properties. Part 2: Properties and press control strategies. In Fundamentals of wood composites manufacturing-USDA Forest Products Laboratory Special Publication. Forest Products Lab, Madison, WI. 34 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions