Variation in Loblolly Pine Cross-Sectional Microfibril Angle With Tree Height and Physiographic Region

Authors

  • Lewis Jordan
  • Rechun Re
  • Daniel B. Hall
  • Alexander Clark
  • Richard F. Daniels

Keywords:

Analysis of variance, mixed-effects, repeated measures, spatial correlation

Abstract

The effect of height and physiographic region on whole disk cross-sectional microfibril angle (CSMFA) in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the southern United States was evaluated. Whole disk CSMFA was determined at 1.4, 4.6, 7.6, 10.7, and 13.7 m up the stem of 59 trees, representing five physiographic regions. A mixed-effects analysis of variance was performed to test the significance of height, region, and the height by region interaction on CSMFA. Height, region, and the height by region interaction terms were all found to be significant at the 0.10 level. Significant differences were found in CSMFA between 1.4 m and all other height levels in all regions. However, there was no difference between CSMFA at 1.4 m and 13.7 m in the Gulf Coastal Plain. No significant difference was found in CSMFA between 4.5, 7.6, and 10.7 meter-height levels in all regions. CSMFA was found to be significantly larger in the north Atlantic and Piedmont regions compared to the south Atlantic, Gulf, and Hilly regions at all heights. The analysis of variance also indicated that significant variation exists among trees within stands and across stands within regions. This is an indicator that aside from the distinct patterns of CSMFA within trees, other factors including site quality, length of growing season, rainfall, and genetics could possibly play a key role in CSMFA development.

References

Addis, T., A. H. Buchanan, and J. C. F. Walker. 1995. A comparison of density and stiffness for predicting wood quality. Or Density: The lazy man's guide to wood quality. J. Inst. Wood Sci.13(6):539-543.nBox, G. E. P., G. M. Jenkins, and G. C. Reinsel. 1994. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, 3rd ed., Holden- Day, San Francisco, CA.nCave, I. D., and J. C. F Walker. 1994. Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: The influence of microfibril angle. Forest Prod. J.44(5):43-48.nClark, A., and R. F. Daniels. 2004. Modeling the effect of physiographic region on wood properties of planted loblolly pine in the southern United States: Connection between Forest Resources and Wood Quality: Modeling Approaches and Simulation Software. Fourth Workshop IUFRO Working Party S5.01-04. Harrison Hot Springs, BC., Canada. September 8-15, 2002. INRA-Centre de Recherches de Nancy, France. pp. 54-60.nKellogg, R. M., E. Thykeson, and W. G. Warren. 1975. The influence of wood and fiber properties on kraft converting-paper quality. Tappi58(12):113-116.nLarson, P. R., D. E. Kretschmann, E. David, A. Clark, and J. G. Isebrands. 2001. Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines: A synopsis. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-129. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab, Madison, WI. 42 pp.nMacDonald, E., and J. Hubert. 2002. A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce. Forestry75(2):107-138.nMegraw, R. A. 1985. Wood quality factors in loblolly pine. The influence of tree age, position in tree, and cultural practice on wood specific gravity, fiber length, and fibril angle. Tappi Press, Atlanta, GA. 88 pp.nMegraw, R. A., D. Bremer, G. Leaf, and J. Roers. 1999. Stiffness in loblolly pine as a function of ring position and height, and its relationship to microfibril angle and specific gravity. Pages 341-349 in Proc. Third Workshop-Connection between Silviculture and Wood Quality through Modeling Approaches. IUFRO S5.01-04. Sept. 5-12, 1999.nPillow, M. Y., B. Z. Terrell, and C. H. Hiller. 1953. Patterns of variation in fibril angles in loblolly pine. Mimeo. D1953. USDA, Forest Service. Washington, DC. 11 pp.nWatson, A. J., and H. E. Dadswell. 1964. Influence of fibre morphology on paper properties. 4. Micellar spiral angle. Appita17:151-156.nYing, L., D. E. Kretschmann, and B. A. Bendtsen. 1994. Longitudinal shrinkage in fast-grown loblolly pine plantation wood. Forest Prod. J.44(1):58-62.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Number 3 / July 2006

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.