Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

EVALUATING BEARING PROPERTIES OF WOOD PEG CONNECTION USING FOUR DIFFERENT TEST METHODS

G. Y. JEONG, J. H. KONG

Abstract


The objective of this study was to evaluate appropriate test methods for the bearing properties of wood peg connection using four different test methods: ASTM D 5764 (2013), the method of Church and Tew (1997), the method of Schmidt and Daniels (1999), and the method of Schmidt and Mackay (1997). Bearing properties of wood peg connection were compared using digital image correlation. Although ASTM D 5764 (2013), the method of Church and Tew (1997), or the method of Schmidt and Daniels (1999) could not differentiate bearing properties by peg orientation, the method of Schmidt and Mackay (1997) could differentiate such properties by peg orientation. ASTM D 5764 (2013), the method of Church and Tew (1997), and the method of Schmidt and Daniels (1999) created unrealistic strain distributions which affected yield load determined from the load–displacement curve. The method of Schmidt and Mackay (1997) showed the highest strain distribution at the bearing area between the wood peg and the main member, resulting in load–displacement curve by bearing mainly. These results suggest that the method of Schmidt and Mackay (1997) could determine the bearing properties of wood peg connection.

 


Keywords


Bearing properties; Connection; Digital image correlation; Stress; Strain; Wood peg

Full Text:

PDF

References


AWC (2015) National design specification for wood construction. American Wood Council, Washington, DC.

ASTM(2013) Standard testmethod for evaluating dowel-bearing strength of wood and wood based products (D5764-97a). Annual book of standards, vol. 04.10. Philadelphia,

PA, America Society of Civil Engineer. 1997. National

Design and Specification for Timber Construction of

U.S.ASCE.

Burnett DT, Clouston P, Damery DT, Fisette P (2003)

Strucutural properties of pegged timber connections as

affected by end distance. Forest Prod J 53(2):50-57.

Church JR, Tew BW (1997) Characterizaion of bearing

factors in pegged timber connections. J Struct Eng 123(3):

-332.

GOMmbH(2007)ARAMIS user manual—Software. aramis_

v6_1st_en_revc, Braunschweig, Germany.

Miller JF, Schmidt RJ, Bulleit WM (2010) New yield

model for wood dowel connections. J Struct Eng 126(10):

-1261.

Sandberg LB, Bulleit WM, Reid EH (2000) Strength and

stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber-frame joints.

J Struct Eng 126(6): 171-723.

Schmidt RJ, Daniels CE (1999) Design considerations for

mortise and tenon connections. Research report, Department

of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University

of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.

Schmidt RJ, Mackay RB (1997) Timber frame tension

joinery. Research report, Department of Civil and Architectural

Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie,

WY.

Shanks JD, Walker P (2009) Strength and stiffness of alltimber

pegged connections. J Mater Civ Eng 21(1):10-18.

Timber Frame Engineering Council (TFEC 1) (2007)

Standard for design of timber frame structures and commentary. Beckett, MA.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.