Theoretical Modeling of Bonding Characteristics and Performance of Wood Composites. Part II. Resin Distribution

Authors

  • Chunping Dai
  • Changming Yu
  • Kevin Groves
  • Hossein Lohrasebi

Keywords:

Wood composites, OSB, resin distribution, bonding, modeling, simulation

Abstract

Further to the development of the inter-element contact model reported in Part I of this series (Dai et al 2006), this paper reports the development of a mathematical (analytical) model and a computer simulation (numerical) model of resin distribution. Based on theories of random coverage process and stochastic system, resin distribution is analytically defined by the average and the variance of resin coverage on constituent wood elements. To complement the analytical model, a numerical model using image digitization and Monte Carlo technique is developed on a computer to visualize and simulate the spatial variation of resin coverage. To validate the models, resin distributions on OSB strands are experimentally investigated using an image analysis technique. The analytical and numerical models are validated by close agreements with each other and with experimental results. It is proposed and modeled that resin coverage is classified into area coverage and mass coverage. The former follows an exponential relationship with resin content, while the latter has a linear relationship with resin content. Both area and mass coverage are strongly affected by element/strand thickness and wood density. The resin area coverage is further affected by resin spot thickness, density, and solids content. Resin spot size has no effect on the average but strong effect on the variance of resin coverage. Implications of the model predictions on improving uniformity and efficiency of resin application are also discussed.

References

Burrows, C. H. 1961. Some factors affecting resin efficiency in flakeboard. Forest Prod. J.11(1):27-3.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1997. On horizontal density variations in randomly-formed short-fibre wood composite boards. Composites Part A.28(A):57-64.nDai, C., C. Yu, and C. Zhou. 2006. Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites: Part I. Inter-element contact. Wood Fiber Sci. (in press).nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1997. On horizontal density variations in randomly-formed short-fibre wood composite boards. Composites Part A.28(A):57-64.nDodson, C. T. J. 1971. Spatial variability and the theory of sampling in random fibrous networks. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B.33(1):88-94.nFurno, T., C-Y. Hse Wand, and W. A. Côté. 1983. Observation of microscopic factors affecting strength and dimensional properties of hardwood flakeboard. Pages 297-312 in T. M. Maloney, ed. Proc. 17th Washington State Univ. Inter. Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium. Washington State Univ. Press, Pullman, WA.nGhosh, B. 1951. Random distances within a rectangle and between two rectangles. Calcutta Math. Soc., 43:17-24.nGroves, C. K. 1997. Assessment of new glue application technology for OSB. Technical Report. Forintek Canada Corp. 16 pp.nGroves, C. K., 1998. A new method for measuring resin distribution in OSB. Technical Report. Forintek Canada Corp. 58 pp.nGroves, C. K., 2000. The effects of resin distribution on oriented strand board properties. Technical Report. Forintek Canada Corp. 16 pp.nHall, P. 1988. Introduction to the theory of coverage processes. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.nHill, M. D. and J. B. Witson. 1978. Particleboard strength as affected by unequal resin distribution on different particle fractions. Forest Prod. J.28(11):44-48.nKamke, F. A., E. Kultikova, and C. A. Lenth. 1996. OSB properties as affected by resin distribution. Pages 147-154 in Proc. Markets and Manufacturing in Panels/Composites for '96. The Fourth International Panel and Engineered-Wood Technology Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA.nKasper, J. B., and S. Chow. 1980. Determination of resin distribution in flakeboard using X-ray spectrometry. Forest Prod. J. (30)7:37-40.nLehmann, W. F. 1965. Improved particleboard through better resin efficiency. Forest Prod. J.15(4):155-161.nLehmann, W. F. 1970. Resin efficiency in particleboard as influenced by density, atomization, and resin content. Forest Prod. J.20(11):48-54.nMeinecke, E., and W. Klauditz. 1962. Physics and technology of bonding in particle-board production. Research report of North Rhine Westfalia #1053. Westdeautscher Verlag, Colognne and Opladen (Translated from German by Israel Program for Scientific Translations in 1968). 81 pp.nSmith, G. D. 2003. The lap-shear strength of droplets arrays of a PF-resin on OSB strands. Forest Prod. J.53(11/12): 1-7.nSmith, G. D., 2005. Direct observation of the tumbling of OSB strands in a industrial scale Coil blender. Wood Fiber Sci.37(1):147-159.nXie, Y., M. Feng, and J. Deng. 2004. Quantification of UF and PF resins in MDF fiber with an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Wood Fiber Sci.36(3):337-343.nYoungquist, J. A., G. C., Myers, and L. L. Murmanis. 1987. Resin distribution in hardwood: evaluated by internal bond strength and fluorescence microscopy. Wood Fiber Sci.19(2):215-224.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions