Modeling Technology Adoption in the Hardwood Sawmill

Authors

  • Scott A. Bowe
  • Robert L. Smith

Keywords:

Hardwood sawmill, scanning, optimizing, technology, adoption, analytic, hierarchy, process

Abstract

This study examined the adoption decision process for scanning and optimizing technology in hardwood sawmills. Data were collected through personal interviews with two hardwood sawmill groups including those that had adopted advanced scanning and optimizing technology and those that had not adopted such technology. The interviewees rated the importance of decision factors in the adoption decision process. They also rated the influence of four sawmill departments on the adoption decision process. These data were compiled using the Analytic Hierarchy Process model. The initial premise that adopters of scanning and optimizing technology managed from a systems perspective was not found. When examining the influence of the four sawmill departments in the adoption decision process, technology adopters rated the production process more than two times higher than the next highest department. Non-adopters also rated the production process the highest; however, the overall rating of the four sawmill departments' influence was more evenly weighted in the non-adopter model.

References

Bowe, S. A., R. L. Smith, D. E. Kline, and P. A. Araman. 2002. A segmental analysis of current and future scan-ning and optimizing technology in the hardwood sawmill industry. Forest Prod. J.52(3):68-76.nBuehlmann, U., M. Bumgardner, A. Schuler, and R. Christianson. 2003. U.S. Competitiveness Study: How Furniture and Cabinet Manufacturers Compare. Wood and Wood Products108(6):49-51.nExpert Choice. 1993. Expert Choice Version 8, Users Manual. Expert Choice, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA.nExpert Choice, Inc. 1999. Expert Choice, Inc. History and Background. [Online] Available: http://www.expertchoice.com/'>http://www.expertchoice.com/nHair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R.C. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1992. Multivariate data analysis with readings, 3rd ed. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY. Pp. 223-264.nHarker, P. T., and L. G. Vargas. 1987. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management Science33(11):1383-1403.nPatton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods: Second Edition. Sage Publications. Newbury Park, CA. Pp. 182-183.nSaaty, T. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.nSPSS. 2001. Statistical Package for Social Scientists. Version 11.0.1 SPSS Inc. Headquarters, 233 S. Wacker Drive, 11th floor, Chicago, IL 60606.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Number 3 / July 2006

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.