Tensile Properties of Single Rattan Fibers
Keywords:Rattan, tensile properties, single fiber, tensile elastic modulus, tensile strength, elongation at breaking point
AbstractThe longitudinal tensile strength of single fibers of four rattan species, namely C. simplicifolius, C. nambariensis Becc. var. yingjiangensis, C. nambariensis var. xishuangbannaensis, and C. yunnanensis, was studied using a custom-built short vegetable fiber mechanical tester. The stress-strain curves produced by the four different rattans showed two distinct phases: a steep, straight segment in the initial phase followed by a straight line with a lower slope up to the breaking point. The respective average values for tensile elastic modulus, tensile strength, and elongation at breaking point of C. simplicifolius, C. nambariensis.var. xishuangbannaensis, C. yunnanensis, and C. nambariensis var. yingjiangensis canes were 10.61, 10.05, 9.10, and 9.54 GPa; 603, 566, 464, and 539 MPa; and 17.00, 17.24, 16.44, and 21.08%. The length position of the single fibers in the cane had variable effects on the three aforementioned properties for all four sampled rattan species. The tensile properties of C. simplicifolius fibers were highest. Compared with wood and bamboo, modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of the studied rattans were much lower, whereas elongation at breaking point of single rattan fibers was generally higher.
Abasolo WP, Yoshida M, Yamamoto H, Okuyama T (2000) Microfibril angle determination of rattan fibers and its influence on the properties of the cane. Holzforschung 54(4):437-442.nBaley C (2002) Analysis of the flax fibres tensile behaviour and analysis of the tensile stiffness increase. Compos Part A-Appl S 33(7):939-948.nBhat KM (1992) Rattans as industrial material of the future. Pages 183-192 in Rattan management and utilization. Proc Rattan (Cane) Seminar, Trichur, India, 29-31 January.nBurgert I (2005) Properties of chemically and mechanically isolated fibres of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Part 3: Mechanical characterization. Holzforschung 59(3):354-357.nCao SP, Wang G, Yu Y, Cheng HT, Chen H (2010) Comparison of mechanical properties of different single vegetable fibers. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University 34(5):87-90 (Natural Science Edition).nCave ID (1997) Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood. Wood Sci Technol 31(4):225-234.nChowdhury MQ (2004) Assessment of some physical and mechanical properties of Golla bet (Daemonorops jenkinsiana) from north-eastern region of Bangladesh. J Bamboo Rattan 3(3):195-201.nEhrnrooth EML, Kolseth P (1984) The tensile testing of single wood pulp fibers in air and in water. Wood Fiber Sci 16(4):549-566.nGroom L, Mott L, Shaler SM (2002a) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part I. Determination and variability of stress-strain curves with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood Fiber Sci 34(1):14-27.nGroom L, Shaler S, Mott L (2002b) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part III. Global relationships between fiber properties and fiber location within an individual tree. Wood Fiber Sci 34(2):238-250.nHuang YH, Fei BH, Yu Y, Wang G, Zhao RJ (2009) Study on the mechanical properties of moso bamboo single fiber. China Pulp & Paper 28(18):10-12.nJayne BA (1959) Mechanical properties of wood fibers. Tappi J 42(6):461-467.nJayne BA (1960) Some mechanical properties of wood fibers in tension. Forest Prod J 10(6):316-322.nKeckes J, Burgert I, Frühmann K, Müller M, Kölln K, Hamilton M, Burghammer M, Roth SV, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Fratzl P (2003) Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood. Nat Mater 2(12):810-813.nKersavage PC (1973) Moisture content effects on tensile properties of individual Douglas-fir latewood tracheids. Wood Fiber Sci 5(2):105-117.nKeunecke D, Michaela E, Burgert I, Niemz P (2008) Micromechanical properties of common yew (Taxus baccata) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) transition wood fibers subjected to longitudinal tension. J Wood Sci 54(5):420-422.nKohler L, Spatz HC (2002) Micromechanics of plant tissues beyond the linear-elastic range. Planta 215(1):33-40.nLi X, Li YH, Zhong ZK, Wang DH, Ratto JA, Sheng KC, Sun XS (2009) Mechanical and water soaking properties of medium density fiberboard with wood fiber and soybean protein adhesive. Biores Technol 100(14):3556-3562.nMarjan SG (2006) A micromechanical approach to the behaviour of single wood fibers and wood fracture at cellular level. PhD thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.nMohmod AL, Yahaya SN (1992) Anatomical characteristics of five Malaysian canes and its relationship with physical and mechanical properties. Pages 207-213 in Rattan management and utilization. Proc Rattan (Cane) Seminar, Trichur, India, 29-31 January.nMott L, Groom L, Shaler S (2002) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part II. Comparison of earlywood and latewood fibers with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood Fiber Sci 34(2):221-237.nNahar S, Hasan M (2013) Effect of chemical composition, anatomy and cell wall structure on tensile properties of bamboo fiber. Eng J AISC 17(1):61-68.nNavi P, Rastogi PK, Gresse V, Tolou A (1995) Micromechanics of wood subjected to axial tension. Wood Sci Technol 29(6):411-429.nPage DH, El-Hosseiny F (1983) The mechanical properties of single wood pulp fibers. Part VI. Fibril angle and the shape of stress-strain curve. J Pulp Paper Sci 9:99-100.nRamires EC, Megiatto JD Jr, Gardrat C, Castellan A, Frollini E (2010) Biobased composites from glyoxal-phenolic resins and sisal fibers. Biores Technol 101(6):1998-2006.nReddy N, Yang YQ (2009) Properties and potential applications of natural cellulose fibers from the bark of cotton stalks. Biores Technol 100(14):3563-3569.nRobson D, Hague J, Newman G, Jeronomidis G, Ansell M (1993) Survey of natural materials for use in structural composites as reinforcement and matrices. BioComposites Centre, University of Wales, Wales, UK.nSedighi-Gilani Navi, MP (2004) Influence of local variation of microfibril angle on tensile behavior of individual wood fibers. Pages 27-35 in Proc Wood Machining Conference, Vienna, Austria.nSpiegelberg HL (1966) The effect of hemicelluloses on the mechanical properties of individual pulp fibers. Tappi J 49(9):388-396.nTomlinson PB (1961) Anatomy of the monocotyledons II. Palmae. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.nWang YH, Wang R, Gao LY, Zhou X, Zhang LF, Jiang ZH, Fei BH, Liu XE, Tian GL (2012) Mechanical properties of single daemonorops margaritae fiber. Journal of North-East Forestry University 40(12):87-89.nYu Y, Jiang ZH, Fei BH, Wang G, Wang HK (2011a) An improved microtensile technique for mechanical characterization of short plant fibers: A case study on bamboo fibers. J Mater Sci 46(3):739-746.nYu Y, Tian GL, Wang HK, Fei BH, Wang G (2011b) Mechanical characterization of single bamboo fibers with nanoindentation and microtensile technique. Holzforschung 65:113-119.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.