Wood Density and Hydraulic Properties of Ponderosa Pine From the Willamette Valley VS. the Cascade Mountains
Keywords:
Wood density, vulnerability to embolism, earlywood density, specific conductivity, ponderosa pine, wood quality, ecological wood anatomyAbstract
The Willamette Valley (WV) race of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) is being widely planted for timber in the Willamette Valley, western Oregon, because it grows in habitats that are either too wet or too dry for Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Compared to the eastern Cascade Mountains (CM), the WV has 3 to 5 times the annual precipitation and warmer temperatures year around. This study characterized the wood quality of the WV race (4 sites) and the CM (4 sites), and also compared the behavior of their wood for water transport for the living trees (1 site in the WV and 1 site in the CM). The average tree ages at the sites ranged from 30 to 83 years at breast height. Between rings 27 and 31, compared to the CM, the WV had denser wood (0.48 vs. 0.40 g/cm3), denser earlywood (0.41 vs. 0.36 g/cm3), and denser latewood (0.62 vs. 0.50 g/cm3), with no significant differences in mean latewood proportion (about 0.35) or mean growth ring width (about 2.5 mm). The pith-to-bark trend in density differed between regions. In the WV, total wood density, earlywood density, and latewood density increased with growth ring from the pith. In the CM, total wood density and latewood density decreased slightly with growth ring width, and earlywood density remained unchanged. An additional sample of younger trees (23 years at breast height) from a genetic trial in the WV in which the seed source was the CM, had low density wood in the first few rings (like the CM trees) but had a steady increase in wood density with growth ring number (like the WV trees). Specific conductivity (ks) of trunk wood was lower in the WV, consistent with its higher wood density and suggestive that the WV race is more drought-adapted than the CM populations. There was no decline in ks from outer to inner sapwood in the WV trees, but a large decline in the CM trees. In water transport experiments, at an applied air pressure of 3.0 MPa, the WV and CM trees had lost 19% and 32% of their ks, respectively, again suggesting that the WV trees are slightly more drought-adapted than are the CM trees. At the other applied air pressures tested (0.5, 2.0. 4.0, and 5.0 MPa), there were no significant differences in loss of conductivity between the two sites. Trunk wood from breast height had a 50% loss of ks at 3.3-3.6 MPa. The loss of relative water content (100% - RWC) was about the same in both sites, except at 4.0 MPa, in which the CM trees had a larger loss of RWC than the WV trees. More work is needed on physiology to better understand the wood density/water transport relations. Ponderosa pine may be more interesting to study than other species because the earlywood, which transports most of the water, shows substantial density differences between geographic regions.References
Barajas-Morales, J. 1987. Wood specific gravity in species from two tropical forests in Mexico. IAWA Bull. n.s. 8:143-148.nBassman, J. H. 1988. Photosynthesis and water relations of ponderosa pine. Pages 45-69 in Ponderosa pine: The species and its management; symposium proceedings. Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 1987, Spokane, WA. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nBlatner, K. A., and R. L. Govett. 1988. Ponderosa pine lumber market. Pages 7-9 in Ponderosa pine: The species and its management; symposium proceedings. Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 1987, Spokane, WA. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nBooker, R. E. 1984. Dye-flow apparatus to measure the variation in axial xylem permeability over a stem cross section. Plant Cell Environ.7:623-628.nBooker, R. E., and J. A. Kininmonth. 1978. Variation in longitudinal permeability of green radiata pine wood. New Zealand J. For. Sci.8:295-308.nBurdon, R. D., and C. B. Low. 1991. Performance of Pinus ponderosa and Pinus jeffreyi provenances in New Zealand. Can. J. For. Res.21:1401-1414.nCallaway, M., E. H. Delucia, and W. H. Schlesinger. 1994. Biomass allocation of montane and desert ponderosa pine: An analog for response to climate change. Ecology75:1474-1481.nCarlquist, S., and D. A. Hoekman. 1985. Ecological wood anatomy of the woody southern California flora. IAWA Bull. n.s. 6:319-347.nCochard, H., P. Cruiziat, and M. T. Tyree. 1992. Use of positive pressure to establish vulnerability curves: Further support for the air-seeding hypothesis and implications for pressure-volume analysis. Plant Physiol.100:205-209.nComstock, G. L. 1965. Longitudinal permeability of green eastern hemlock. Forest Prod. J.15:441-449.nConkle, M. T., and W. B. Critchfield. 1988. Genetic variation and hybridization of ponderosa pine. Pages 27-43 in Ponderosa pine: The species and its management; symposium proceedings. Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 1987, Spokane, WA. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nDomec, J. C., and B. L. Gartner. 2001. Cavitation and water storage capacity in bole xylem segments of mature and young Douglas-fir trees. Trees15:204-214.nDomec, J. C., and B. L. Gartner. 2002a. Age- and position-related changes in hydraulic versus mechanical dysfunction of xylem: Inferring the design criteria for Douglas-fir wood structure. Tree Physiology22:91-104.nDomec, J. C., and B. L. Gartner. 2002b. How do water transport and water storage differ in coniferous earlywood and latewood? J. Exp. Botany53:2369-2379.nDomec, J. C., and B. L. Gartner. 2003. Relationship between growth rates and xylem hydraulic characteristics in young, mature, and old-growth ponderosa pine trees. Plant, Cell and Environment (in press).nDownes, G., C. Beadle, and D. Worledge. 1999. Daily stem growth patterns in irrigated Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens in relation to climate. Trees14:102-111.nEchols, R. M. 1972. Patterns of wood density distribution and growth rate in ponderosa pine. Pages H1-H16 in Symposium on the Effect of Growth Acceleration on the Properties of Wood. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nEchols, R. M., and M. T. Conkle. 1971. The influence of plantation and seed source elevation on wood specific gravity of 29-year old ponderosa pines. Forest Sci.17:388-394.nForest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPLGTR-113. USDA, Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI: 463 pp.nGartner, B. L. 1995. Patterns of xylem variation within a tree and their hydraulic and mechanical consequences. Pages 125-149 in B. L. Gartner, ed. Plant stems: Physiology and functional morphology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.nGooding, G. D. 1998. Genetic variation and mating system of ponderosa pine in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. M.S. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.nHacke, U. G., J. S. Sperry, W. T. Pockman, S. D. Davis, and K. A. Mcculloh. 2001. Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia126:457-461.nHibbs, D. E., M. V. Wilson, and A. L. Bower. 2002. Ponderosa pine of the Willamette Valley, Western Oregon. Northwest Science76:80-84.nHowe, J. P. 1968. Influence of irrigation on ponderosa pine. Forest Prod. J.18:84-93.nHubbard R., B. J. Bond, and M. G. Ryan. 1999. Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiol.19:165-172.nLarson, P. R., D. E. Kretschmann, A. I. Clark, and J. D. Isebrands. 2001. Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines: A synopsis. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-129. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI. 42 pp.nLinhart, Y. 1988. Ecological and evolutionary studies of ponderosa pine in the Rocky Mountains. Pages 77-89 in Ponderosa pine: The species and its management; symposium proceedings. Sept. 29-Oct. 1, 1987, Spokane, WA. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nLiu, C.J., J. R. Olson, Y. Tian, and Q. Shen. 1988. Theoretical wood densitometry: I mass attenuation equations and wood density models. Wood Fiber Sci.20:22-34.nLopushinsky, W., and G. O. Klock. 1974. Transpiration of conifers seedlings in relation to soil water potential. Forest Sci.20:181-186.nMaherali, H., and E. H. Delucia. 2000a. Xylem conductivity and vulnerability to cavitation of ponderosa pine growing in contrasting climates. Tree Physiol.20:859.nMaherali, H., and E. H. Delucia. 2000b. Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on water transport in ponderosa pine. Am. J. Bot.87:243-249.nMarkstrom, D. C., and R. A. Hann. 1972. Seasonal variation in wood permeability and stem moisture content of three Rocky Mountain softwoods. Research Note No. RM-212, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, CO.nMargolis, H., R. Oren, D. Whitehead, and M. R. Kaufmann. 1995. Leaf area dynamics of conifer forests. Pages 181-223 in W. K. Smith and T. M. Hinckley, eds. Ecophysiology of coniferous forests. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.nMegraw, R. A. 1985. Wood quality factors in loblolly pine: The influence of tree age, position in tree, and cultural practice on wood specific gravity, fiber length, and fibril angle. Tappi Press, Atlanta, GA.nMencuccini, M., and J. Grace. 1995. Climate influences the leaf area/sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiol.15:1-10.nMyers, C. A. 1960. Estimating oven-dry weight of pulpwood in standing ponderosa pines. J. Forestry58:889-891.nNicholls, J. W. P., and J. P. Wright. 1976. The effect of environmental factors on wood characteristics. 3. The influence of climate and site on young Pinus radiata material. Can. J. For. Res.6:113-121.nOliver, W. W., and R. A. Ryker. 1990. Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.: Ponderosa pine. Pages 413-424 in R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala, Technical Coordinators, Silvics of North America, vol. 1, Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654, USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C.nParker, J. 1969. Further studies of drought resistance in woody plants. Bot. Rev.35:317-371.nPiñol, J., and A. Sala. 2000. Ecological implications of xylem cavitation for several Pinaceae in the Pacific Northern USA. Functional Ecol.14:538-545.nPothier, D., H. A. Margolis, J. Poliquin, and R. H. Waring. 1989. Relation between the permeability and the anatomy of jack pine sapwood with stand development. Can. J. For. Res.19:1564-1570.nPruyn, M. L., B. L. Gartner, and M. E. Harmon. 2002. Respiratory potential in sapwood of old versus young ponderosa pine trees in the Pacific Northwest. Tree Physiol.22:105-116.nRyan, M. G. 1990. Growth and maintenance respiration in stems of Pinus contorta and Picea engelmannii. Can. J. For. Res. 20:48-57.nSAS Institute Inc. 1997. SAS software release 6.12. SAS Institute, Carey, NC.nSiau, J. F. 1984. Transport processes in wood. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 245 pp.nSilen, R. R. 2002. Ponderosa pine regional races study—1926. Pages 8-10 in Willamette Valley Ponderosa Pine Conservation Association, 2001 Annual Report.nSorensen, F. C., and R. S. Miles. 1982. Inbreeding depression in height, height growth, and survival of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, and noble fir to 10 years of age. Forest Sci.28:283-292.nSparks, J. P., and R. A. Black. 1999. Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa: The role of stomatal control in preventing xylem cavitation. Tree Physiol.19:453-459.nSperry, J. S., and M. T. Tyree. 1988. Mechanism of water-stress induced xylem embolism. Plant Physiol.88:581-587.nSperry, J. S., and N. Z. Saliendra. 1994. Intra- and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant Cell Environ. 17:1233-1241.nSperry, J. S., M. T. Tyree, and J. R. Donnelly. 1988. A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant Cell Environ.11:35-40.nSpicer, R., and B. L. Gartner. 2001. The effects of cambial age and position within the stem on specific conductivity in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) sapwood. Trees15:222-229.nSquillace, A. E., and R. R. Silen. 1962. Racial variation in ponderosa pine. For. Sci. Monogr. No. 2. 27 pp.nStamm, A. J. 1970. Variations of maximum tracheid and pit pore dimensions from pith to bark for ponderosa pine and redwood before and after drying determined by liquid displacement. Wood Sci. Technol.4:81-96.nStout, D. L., and A. Sala. 1999. Cavitation and xylem vulnerability in Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii along a soil moisture gradient. Abstracts of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, Aug. 8-12, 1999, Spokane, WA.nStratton, L., G. Goldstein, and F. C. Meinzer. 2000. Stem water storage capacity and efficiency of water transport: Their functional significance in a Hawaiian dry forest. Plant Cell Environ.23:99-106.nTaylor, G. H., and C. Hannan. 1999. The climate of Oregon: From rain forest to desert. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR. 211 pp.nTyree, M. T., S. D. Davis, and H. Cochard. 1994. Biophysical perspectives of xylem evolution: Is there a tradeoff of hydraulic efficiency for vulnerability to dysfunction? IAWA J.15:335-360.nVarem-Sanders, T. M. L., and I. D. Campbell. 1996. DendroScan: A tree-ring width and density measurement system. Natural Reource Can., Canadian Forest Service, North. For. Cent., Edmonton, Alberta.nVoorhies, G. 1969. Specific gravity studies of young-growth southwestern ponderosa pine. Forest Prod. J.19(6):45-46.nWaring, R. H., P. E. Schroeder, and R. Oren. 1982. Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can. J. For. Res.12:556-560.nZobel, B. J., and J. P. Van Buijtenen. 1989. Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.nZobel, B. J., and J. R. Sprague. 1998. Juvenile wood in forest trees. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
