Environmental Implications of Wood Production in Intensively Managed Plantations
Keywords:
Environment, environmental impacts, tree plantations, forest plantations, wood, carbon sequestration, plantation productivity, wood consumptionAbstract
Although many of the issues raised about forest plantations are non-trivial, there are a number of significant environmental advantages of plantation establishment that appear to outweigh concerns, if plantation management practices can be developed to address concerns regarding sustainability. Foremost among the advantages is that establishment of highly productive forest plantations can provide large quantities of wood and fiber from relatively small land areas, raising the possibility that pressures for harvesting within natural forests can be markedly reduced. Moreover, assuming that forest plantations are carefully established and managed, they have the potential to produce a continuous, renewable stream of industrial raw materials that results in less overall environmental impact than other types of raw materials. Assessment of total environmental impacts over product life cycles shows that structural and nonstructural wood and wood fiber products made from plantation-derived raw material yield markedly lower impacts than similar products made from metallic, cementitious, petroleumbased, or other raw materials. Similarly, examination of total environmental impacts of papermaking fiber production in forest plantations versus fiber production using annual agricultural crops shows significant advantages to wood fiber. Thus, forest plantations can yield environmental benefits that extend well beyond the geographic location in which they are located.References
Binkleyd, D., and C. Giardina. 1997. Nitrogen fixation in tropical forest plantations. Pages 297-337 in E. Nambiar, and A. Brown, eds. Management of soil nutrients and water in tropical plantation forests. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR Monograph Series No. 43.nBoardman, R. 1979. Maintenance of productivity in successive rotations of radiata pine in South Australia. Pages 543-554 in E. Ford, D. Malcolm, and J. Atterson, eds. The ecology of even-aged forest plantations. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge, UK.nBowyer, J. 1997. Economic and environmental comparisons of kenaf growth vs. plantation grown softwood and hardwood. Pages 323-346 in Proc. Fifth Chemical Congress of North America—Chemistry of kenaf properties and materials, American Chemical Society, November 11-15. Cancun, Mexico.nBoyd, C., P. Koch, H. McKean, C. Morschauser, S. Preston, and F. Wangaard. 1976. Wood for structul and architectural purposes. Wood Fiber 8(1):3-72.nBrockie, R. 1992. A living New Zealand forest—A community of plants and animals. David Bateman, Ltd., Auckland, NZ.nBrowna, A., E. Nambiara, and C. Cossalter. 1997. Plantations for the tropics—Their role, extent, and nature. Pages 1-23 in E. Nambiar and A. Brown, eds. 1997. Management of soil nutrients and water in tropical plantation forests. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR Monograph Series No. 43.nBruijnzeel, L. 1997. Hydrology of forest plantations in the tropics. Pages 125-167 in E. Nambiar and A. Brown, eds. 1997. Management of soil nutrients and water in tropical plantation forests. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR Monograph Series No. 43.nBurdon, R. 1982. Monocultures—How vulnerable? What's new in forest research? New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Report No. 115, 4 pp. Rotorua, NZ.nCalder. L. 1992. Water use of eucalypts—A review. Pages 167-179 in I. Calder, R. Hall, and P. Allard, eds. Growth and water use of forest plantations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.nCalder. L., M. Swaminatgh, Kariyappa, N. Srinivasalu, K. Srinivasa Murthy, and J. Mumtaz. 1992. Measurements of transpiration from eucalyptus plantations, India, using deuterium tracing. Pages 196-215 in I. Calder, R. Hall, and P. Allard, eds. Growth and water use of forest plantations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.nCanadian Wood Council. 1997. Comparing the environmental effects of buildings. Case Study Report No. 4. 11 pp.nChampion, H. 1949. Biology and technique of afforestation. Pages 14-20 in Proc. World Forestry Congress, Brazilia, Brazil.nCiesla, W. 1992. Recent introductions of forest insects and their effects: A worldwide overview. Regional Conference on the Management of the Woodwasp Sirex noctillo in South American Pine Plantations. Nov. 23-27. Florianopolis, Brazil.nClapp, R. 1993. The forests at the end of the world: The transition from old-growth to plantation forestry in Chile. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, CA.nDavidson, J. 1987. Bioenergy tree plantations in the tropics: Ecological implications and impacts. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 47 pp.nDawkins, H. 1958. Silvicultural research plan, first revision, period 1959 to 1963 inclusive. Forest Department, Entebbe, Uganda. 24 pp.nDiNicola, A., G. Gray, and D. Jones. 1997. Opportunities for forestry investment in the Asia Pacific region through carbon offset initiatives. Regional Wood Energy Development Program Field Document 53. United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. Bangkok, Thailand.nDuff, A., R. Hall, and C. Marsh. 1986. A survey of wildlife in and around a commercial tree plantation in Sabah. Malaysian Forester 47(3/4): 197-213.nEvans, J. 1986. Productivity of second and third rotations of pine in the Usutu forest, Swaziland. Commonw. For. Rev. 65(3):205-214.nEvans, J. 1988. The Usutu forest: Twenty years later. Unasylva 40(159):19-29.nEvans, J. 1992. Plantation forestry in the tropics: Tree planting for industrial, social, environmental, and agroforestry purposes. Oxford University Press. 403 pp. New York: NY.nEvans, J. 1999. Planted forests of the wet and dry tropics: their variety, nature, and significance. New Forests 17: 25-36.nFahey, B. 1994. The effect of plantation forestry on water yield in New Zealand. New Zealand Forestry 39(3):18-23.nFahey, B., and L. Rowe. 1992. Land-use impacts. Pages 265-284 in M. Mosley, ed. Waters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society.nFahey, B., and A. Watson. 1991. Hydrological impacts of converting tussock grassland to pine plantation. J. Hydrology (NZ)30:1-15.nGibson, I., and T. Jones. 1977. Monoculture in the origin of major forest pests and diseases. In J. Cherrett and G. Sagar, eds. Origins of pest, parasite, disease, and weed problems. Blackwell Scientific Publications London: UK. 413 pp.nGrainger, A. 1988. Estimating areas of degraded tropical lands requiring replenishment of forest cover. Int. Tree Crops J. 5(1/2):31-62.nHakkila, P. 1994. Pine plantations of the southern hemisphere and tropics as a source of timber. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Paper 532. 63 pp.nHarmon, M., W. Ferrell., and J. Franklin. 1990. Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247:699-701.nHeering, M. 1997. Quo vadimus? Pages 21-32 in O. Bouman and D. Brand, eds. Sustainable forests: Global challenges and local solutions. Haworth Press, New York, NY.nLai, R. 1997. Soils of the tropics and their management for plantation forestry. Pages 97-123 in E. Nambiar and A. Brown, eds. 1997. Management of soil nutrients and water in tropical plantation forests. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR Monograph Series No. 43.nLee, S. 1992. Biodiversity. Tree plantation review: Study No. 6. Shell International Petroleum Company/WWF, UK.nLeslie, A. 1992. How much wood do we need? Pages 76-91 in C. Sargent and S. Bass, eds. Plantation politics—Forest plantations in development. Earthscan Publications, Ltd., London: UK.nLeslie, A. 1999. For whom the bell tolls. Tropical Forest Update 9(4).nLovejoy, T. 1990. Consensus statement on commercial forestry sustained yield management and tropical forests. Smithsonian Institution (January). 10 pp.nLundstrom, A., P. Nilsson, and G. Stahl. 1997. The consequences of certification on possible supply of industrial wood and fuelwood. A Pilot Study. Working Paper No. 23. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Studies, Umea, Sweden. (Swedish).nLyons, M. 1993. Facing up to the Asia Pacific resource crunch. Asia Pacific Forest Industries, (May):36-39.nMaclaren, J. 1996. Environmental effects of planted forests in New Zealand: The implications of continued afforestation of pasture. New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Bulletin No. 198. 180 pp.nMarland, G. 1993. Strategies for using trees to minimize net emissions of CO2 to the atmosphere. Record of testimony before The U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Energy and Power, Congressional Record, Serial No. 103-92. July 29.nMarland, G., and B. Schlamadinger. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol could make a difference for the optimal forest-based CO2 mitigation strategy: Some results from GOR-CAM. Environ. Sci. Policy 2:111-124.nMarsh, E. 1962. The introduction of fast growing exotic tree species for meeting the timber requirements of developing countries. In Papers, UNSAT Conference: E/CONF.39/C/13. Geneva, Switzerland.nMather, A. 1990. Global forest resources. Timber Press, Portland, OR. 341 pp.nMather, A. 1993. Review. Pages 207-219 in Afforestation policies, planning, and progress. A. Mathur, ed. Bell-haven Press, United Kingdom.nMcNabb, K., J. Borges, and J. Welker. 1994. Jari at 25—An investment in the Amazon. J. Forestry 92(2): 21-26.nMeil, J. 1994. Environmental measures as substitution criteria for wood and non-wood building products. Pages 53-60 in Proc., The globalization of wood: Supply, processes, products, and markets. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI.nMichon, G., F. Mary, and J. Bompard. 1986. Multistoried agroforestry garden system in Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 4:315-338.nMinistry of External Relations and Trade. (MERT) 1992. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. New Zealand, MERT, Wellington.nMontagnini, F., and F. Sancho. 1994. Nutrient budgets of young plantations with native trees: Strategies for sustained management. Pages 213-233 in W. Bentley and M. Gover, eds. Forest resources and wood-based biomass energy as rural development assets. Winrock International, and Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India.nNorton, D. 1989. Indigenous plants in the exotic plantation forests of the Canterbury Plains. J. Canterbury Bot. Soc. 23:21-27.nO'Connell, A., and K. Sankaran. 1997. Organic matter accretion, decomposition, and mineralization. Pages 443-480 in E. Nambiar and A. Brown, eds. 1997. Management of soil nutrients and water in tropical plantation forests. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR Monograph Series No. 43.nPandey, D. 1995. Forest resources assessment 1990—Tropical forest plantation resources. FAO, Rome: Forestry Paper 128.nParrotta, J. 1992. The role of plantation forests in rehabilitating degraded tropical ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 41:115-133.nParrotta, J. 1995. Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on degraded tropical site. J. Vegetation Sci. 6: 627-636.nPearce, A., and L. Rowe. 1979. Forest management effects on interception, evaporation, and water yield. J. Hydrology (NZ) 18:73-87.nPerry, D., and J. Maghembe. 1989. Ecosystem concepts and current trends in forest management: time for reappraisal. Forest Ecology and Management 26.nPierquet, P., J. Bowyer, and P. Huelman. 1998. Thermal performance and embodied energy of cold climate wall systems. Forest Prod. J. 48(6):53-60.nSargent, C. 1991. Vietnam Forestry Sector Review: Land Use Issues. MOF/UNDP/FAO. VIE/88/037. IIED. London, UK.nSargent, C. 1992. Natural forest or plantation? Pages 16-40 in C. Sargent and S. Bass, eds. Plantation politics: Forest plantations in development. Earthscan Publishers, London, UK.nSawyer, J. 1993. Plantations in the tropics: environmental concerns. IUCN/UNEP/WWF, Cambridge, UK.nSchultz, R. 1999. Loblolly—The pine for the twenty-first century. New Forests 17:71-88.nSedjo, R. 1999. The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs. New Forests 17:339-359.nSedjo, R., and D. Botkin. 1997. Using forest plantations to spare national forests. Environment 39(10):14-20, 30.nSpaargaren, O., and J. Deckers. 1998. The world reference base for soil resources—An introduction with special reference to the soils of tropical forest ecosystems. Pages 21-28 in A. Schulte and D. Ruhiyat, eds. Soils of tropical forest ecosystems—Characteristics, ecology, and management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.nSteen, H., ed. 1997. Plantation forestry in the Amazon: The Jari experience. Forest History Society, Durham, NC.nSutton, W. 1993. The world's need for wood. Pages 21-28 in Proc., The globalization of wood: Supply, processes, products, and markets. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI.nSutton, W. 1999. Does the world need planted forests? Proc., Intersessional Expert Meeting on the Role of Planted Forests, April 6-9, Santiago, Chile.nSwedish Agency for Research Cooperation with Developing Countries. 1992. Mixed and pure forest plantations in the tropics. A paper based on the work of T.J. Wormald. FAO, Rome: Forestry Paper 103.nTiarks, A., E. Nambiar, and D. Cossalter. 1998. Site management and productivity in tropical forest plantations. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 16.nWadsworth, F. 1997. Forest production for tropical America. USDA, Forest Service, Agricultural Handbook 710. 563 pp.nWEC/IIASA. 1995. Global energy perspectives to 2050 and beyond. World Energy Council, London, UK.nWhiteman, A. 2000. Personal correspondence from FAO, Rome, to Dr. Con Schallau, Moscow, Idaho. (February 3).nWhitmore, J. 1999. The social and environmental importance of forest plantations with emphasis on Latin America. J. Tropical Forest Sci. 11(1):255-269.nWidagda, L. 1981. Biophysical and environmental constraints of tree plantations in Hawaii. Environment and Policy Institute, East-West Center, 37 pp. Honolulu, Hawaii.nWill, G. 1984. Monocultures and site productivity. In Proc. Productivity of Fast Growing Plantations, IUFRO, Pretoria and Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.nWilson, A. 1993. Cement and concrete: Environmental considerations. Environmental Building News 2(2):1;7-12.nWright, J., A. DiNicola, and E. Gaitan. 2000. Latin American forest plantations—Opportunities for carbon sequestration, economic development, and financial returns. J. Forestry 98(9):20-23.nWyatt-Smith, J. 1987. The management of moist forest for the sustained production of timber: Some issues. IUCN/IIED Tropical Forest Policy Paper No. 4.nZobel, B., and J. Talbert. 1984. Applied forest tree improvement. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.nZobel, B., G. Vanloyk, and P. Stajl. 1987. Growing exotic forests. John Wiley & Sons, Somerset, NY. 500 pp.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
