Influence of Fungal Decay and Moisture Absorption on Mechanical Properties of Extruded Wood-Plastic Composites
Keywords:Fungal decay, mechanical properties, moisture absorption, natural fiber thermoplastic composites, redwood, weight loss, wood-plastic composites, yellow-poplar
AbstractIn previous research on the effects of fungal decay on the mechanical properties of wood-plastic composites (WPC), results were inconclusive due to the influence of moisture absorption. This study was conducted to clarify the contributions of moisture and wood decay fungi to WPC damage. Changes in flexural strength (MOR), modulus (MOE), and weight of two extruded wood-polyethylene composite (WPC) formulations, yellow-poplar sapwood and redwood heartwood, were compared following 3 months of incubation with wood decay fungi. All materials were evaluated using modified agar-block tests in which the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor and the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum were employed as test fungi. In addition, soil-block tests were performed with yellow-poplar, one WPC formulation, and T. versicolor as test fungus only. It was determined that stiffness of WPC was affected more severely by moisture absorption than by fungal colonization. Strength of WPC was not affected by decay fungi but significantly (p = 0.0001) reduced by moisture absorption for a formulation containing 70% wood filler. Calculation of weight loss in WPC was based on the wood fraction only. Modified agar-block and soil-block tests were equally suited for determining weight loss in WPC, but agar-block tests could be completed in a shorter time span. Weight loss of a formulation with 70% wood filler and incubated with T. versicolor was twice as high as that of redwood in a modified agar-block test (6% versus 3%); however, only 1% weight loss was obtained when the formulation contained 49% wood filler. These results indicate that WPC can be designed to provide high fungal durability by controlling the material composition of the formulation. Weight loss is a more sensitive indicator of fungal decay than strength and stiffness measurements in WPC as well as in redwood.
Albertsson, A. C., S. O. Andersson, and S. Karlsson. 1987. The mechanism of biodegradation of polyethylene. Polym. Degrad. Stabil.18:73-87.nAlbertsson, A. C., and S. Karlsson. 1988. The three stages in degradation of polymers - polyethylene as a model substance. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.35:1289-1302.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1981. ASTM D 2017-81: Standard method of accelerated laboratory test of natural decay resistance of woods. American Society of Testing and Materials, Conshohocken, PA.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1984 ASTM D 790-84a: Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, Conshohocken, PA.nBerk, S., H. Ebert, and L. Teitell. 1957. Utilization of plasticizers and related organic compounds by fungi. Ind. Eng. Chem.49(7):1115-1124.nBrown, A. E. 1946. The problem of fungal growth on synthetic resins, plastics and plasticizers. Mod. Plast.23(8):189-195, 254, 256.nClemons, C. 2002. Wood-plastic composites in the United States—the interfacing of two industries. Forest Prod. J.52(6):10-18.nClemons, C. and R. E. Ibach. 2004. Effects of processing method and moisture history on laboratory fungal resistance of wood-HDPE composites. Forest Prod. J.54(4):50-57.nHakkarainen, M., F. Khabbaz, and A.-C. Albertsson. 2003. Biodegradation of polyethylene followed by assimilation of degradation products. Pages 369-394 in S. Matsumura and A. Steinbüchel, eds. Miscellaneous Biopolymers and Biodegradation of Synthetic Polymers. V 9 in A. Steinbüchel, ed. Biopolymers. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.nHardie, K. 1980. A review of strength testing as a measure of biodeterioration of wood and wood based materials. Int. Biodeterior.16(1):1-8.nIbach, R. E, and C. M. Clemons. 2002. Biological resistance of polyethylene composites made with chemically modified fiber or flour. Pages 574-583 in P.E. Humphrey, ed. Proc. of the 6th Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composites Symposium, Portland, OR. Wood Science and Engineering Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.nIiyoshi, Y., Y. Tsutsumi, and T. Nishida. 1998. Polyethylene degradation by lignin-degrading fungi and manganese peroxidase. J. Wood Sci. 44:222-229.nKennedy, R. W. 1958. Strength retention in wood decayed to small weight losses. Forest Prod. J.8:308-314.nKhavkine, M., M. Kazayawoko, S. Law, and J. J. Balatinecz. 2000. Durability of wood flour-thermoplastic composites under extreme environmental conditions and fungal exposure. Int. J. Polym. Mater.46:255-269.nKollmann, F. F. P., and W. A. Côté. 1968. Principles of wood science and technology. I. Solid wood. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 592 pp.nMankowski, M. M., and J. J. Morrell. 2000. Patterns of fungal attack in wood-plastic composites following exposure in a soil-block test. Wood Fiber Sci.32(3):340-345.nMorris, P. I., and P. Cooper. 1998. Recycled plastic/wood composite lumber attacked by fungi. Forest Prod. J.48(1):86-88.nPendleton, D. E., T. A. Hoffard, T. Adcock, B. Woodward, and M. P. Wolcott. 2002. Durability of an extruded HDPE/wood composite. Forest Prod. J.52(6):21-27.nSAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/Stat User's Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.nScheffer, T. C. 1973. Microbiological degradation and the causal organisms. Pages 31-106 in D.D. Nicholas, ed. Wood deterioration and its prevention by preservative treatments. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.nSchirp, A., and M. P. Wolcott. 2005. Fungal degradation of wood-plastic composites and evaluation using dynamic mechanical analysis. Submitted.nSchmidt, O. 1994. Holz- und Baumpilze. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. 246 pp.nSilva, A., C. Freitag, J. J. Morrell, and B. Gartner. 2001. Effect of fungal attack on creep behaviour and strength of wood plastic composites. Pages 73-77 in Proc. 6th International Conference on Woodfiber-Plastic Composites, May 15-16, 2001, Madison, WI. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI.nSimonsen, J., C. M. Freitag, A. Silva, and J. J. Morrell. 2004. Wood/plastic ratio: Effect on performance of borate biocides against a brown rot fungus. Holzforschung58:205-208.nStark, N. 2001. Influence of moisture absorption on mechanical properties of wood flour-polypropylene composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos.14:421-432.nTrendelenburg, R. 1940. Über die Abkürzung der Zeitdauer von Pilzversuchen an Holz mit Hilfe der Schlagbiegeprüfung. Holz Roh-Werkst.3(12):397-407.nVerhey, S. A., P. E. Laks, and D. L. Richter. 2001a. The effect of composition on the decay resistance of model woodfiber-thermoplastic composites. Pages 79-86 in Proc. 6th International Conference on Woodfiber-Plastic Composites, May 15-16, 2001, Madison, WI. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI.nVerhey, S. A., P. E. Laks, and D. L. Richter. 2001b. Laboratory decay resistance of woodfiber/thermoplastic composites. Forest Prod. J.51(9):44-49.nWilcox, W. W. 1978. Review of literature on the effects of early stages of decay on wood strength. Wood Fiber9(4):252-257.nWolcott, M. P. 2001. Wood-Plastic Composites. Pages 9759-9763 in K. H. J. Buschow, R. W. Cahn, M. C. Flemings, B. Ilschner, E. J. Kramer, and S. Mahajan, eds. Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York.nWolcott, M. P. and K. Englund. 1999. A Technology Review of Wood-Plastic Composites. Pages 103-111 in M.P. Wolcott, R.J. Tichy, and D.A. Bender, eds. 33rd International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium Proceedings, April 13-15, 1999, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nZabel, R. A., and J. J. Morrell. 1992. Wood microbiology: Decay and its prevention. Academic Press, Inc. 476 pp.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.