Effects of Conditioning Exposure on the pH Distribution Near Adhesive-Wood Bond Lines

Authors

  • Zeen Huang
  • Paul Cooper
  • Xiaodong Wang
  • Xiang-Ming Wang
  • Yaolin Zhang
  • Romulo Casilla

Keywords:

pH distribution, phenol formaldehyde, melamine formaldehyde, melamine-urea formaldehyde, adhesives, bond line, accelerated aging, chemical change, FTIR ATR

Abstract

The pH distribution near the adhesive-wood bond line in black spruce (Picea mariana) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) bonded with various acidic and alkaline adhesives was investigated. For alkaline adhesives, exposure to moderate to high RH conditions and to accelerated aging treatments such as vacuum-pressure-dry or water soaking resulted in diffusion of hydroxyl ions (OH-) away from the bond line and decreased alkalinity. A moderate increase of pH in the bond line was also observed for acidic adhesives, and under very wet conditions, hydrogen ions (H+), also diffused away from the bond line. Spruce and Douglas-fir samples exposed to strongly acidic and alkaline buffered solutions for 3 mon did not show appreciable changes in chemical composition by wet chemical analysis. FTIR attenuated total reflectance spectra of samples bonded with an alkaline adhesive and exposed to either dry or wet conditions showed dissociation of carboxylic acid groups in hemicelluloses (decreased absorbance at 1735 cm -1) to a distance of 150-300 μm from the center of adhesive bond lines. No effects on wood chemistry were observed around acidic adhesive bond lines. In summary, wood bonded with high-pH adhesives and exposed to wet service conditions rapidly reached moderate pH conditions in the bond line because of the high rate of OH- diffusion in wood and the acidic buffering capacity of wood. This mitigated the effects of high pH in these alkaline adhesives. A similar but less effective process occurred with acidic adhesives.

References

ASTM (2004) 2559-04. Standard specification for adhesives for structural laminated wood products for use under exterior (wet use) exposure conditions. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2008) D1583-01 (2008). Standard test method for hydrogen ion concentration of dry adhesive films. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nBlomquist RF (1949) Effect of alkalinity of phenol- and resorcinol-resin glues on durability of joints in plywood. USDA For Serv FPL Report R1748 (reaffirmed 1962). Madison, WI.nBrowning BL (1967) Methods of wood chemistry. Vol. 2. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.nCSA (1977a) Phenol and phenol-resorcinol resin adhesives for wood (high-temperature curing). Standard O112.6-M1977. Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.nCSA (1977b) Resorcinol and phenol-resorcinol resin adhesives for wood (room- and intermediate-temperature curing). CSA Standard O112.7-M1977. Canadian Standards Association Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.nCSA (2004) Evaluation of adhesives for structural wood products (exterior exposure). CSA Standard O112.9-04. Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON.nEffland MJ (1977) Modified procedure to determine acidinsoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Tappi 60(10):143-144.nGillespie RH, River BH (1975) Durability of adhesives in plywood: Dry-heat effects by rate-process analysis. Forest Prod J 25(7):26-32.nISO (2008) Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 20152.1 ISO/TC 165. Timber structures—Bond performance of adhesives. ISO/DIS 20152-1.2 Timber structures—Bond performance of adhesives—Part 1: Basic requirements. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland.nKline GM, Reinhart FW, Rinker RC, De Lollis NG (1947) Effect of catalyst and pH on strength of resin-bonded plywood. Modern Plastics July:123-128, 196-202.nPandey KK (1999) A study of chemical structure of soft and hardwood and wood polymers by FTIR spectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci 71:1969-1975.nPandey KK, Pitman AJ (2003) FTIR studies of the changes in wood chemistry following decay by brown-rot and white-rot fungi. Int Biodeter Biodegr 52:151-160.nPizzi A, Vosloo R, Cameron FA, Orovan E (1986) Selfneutralizing acid-set PF wood adhesives. Holz Roh Werkst 44:229-234.nRaknes AE (1976) Long-term durability of glues for loadbearing timber constructions: Results after 10 years of exposure. Norsk Skogindustri 30(6):168-171, 175-176.nRaknes AE (1981) Long-term durability of structural adhesives for wood: Results after 15 years' exposure. Norsk Skogindustri 35(10):260, 270-273.nSantos CB, Pimenta AS, Vital BR, Barbosa LC (2003) Effect of pH variation and synthesis temperature on the performance of thermosetting adhesive formulations based on demethylated wood creosote-formaldehyde. Revista Arvore. 27(4):551-559.nWang XM, Casilla R, Zhang Y (2009a) Impact of extreme pH of structural adhesives on bond durability as related to development and modification of CSA O112 Wood Adhesive Standards: Part II: Evaluation of block shear properties of selected wood adhesives by short term exposure test. Report on Project FCC 12E, Value to Wood Program, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada.nWang XM, Casilla R, Zhang Y (2009b) Impact of extreme pH of structural adhesives on bond durability as related to development and modification of CSA O112 Wood Adhesive Standards: Part III: Evaluation of block shear properties of selected wood adhesives by long term exposure test. Report on Project FCC 12E, Value to Wood Program, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada.nWangaard FF (1946) Summary of information on the durability of woodworking glues. USDA For Serv FPL Report No. 1530 (revised 1956 as: Durability of water-resistant woodworking glues). Madison, WI.nZhang J, Kamdem DP (2000) FTIR characterization of copper ethanolamine-wood interaction for wood preservation. Holzforschung 54(2):119-122.nZimmermann T, Richter K, Bordeanu N, Sell J (2007) Arrangement of cell-wall constituents in chemically treated Norway spruce tracheids. Wood Fiber Sci 39(2):221-231.n

Downloads

Published

2010-04-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions