Effect of Extended Mat Open Assembly Time on Properties of OSB Bonded With PMDI

Authors

  • Kate E. Semple
  • Emmanuel K. Sackey
  • Hamid R. Fakhri
  • Trevor McConchie
  • Gregory D. Smith

Keywords:

Oriented strandboard, shortleaf pine, resins, polymeric methylene diphenol di-isoscyanate (pMDI), interpenetrating networks, open time

Abstract

In this study, the effect of increasing mat open assembly time on the strength properties of oriented strandboards bonded with polymeric methylene diphenol di-isocyanate (pMDI) resin was examined. Isocyanates are more sensitive to open assembly times than other resin systems such as phenol formaldehyde (PF), and the storage capacity of pMDI-blended wood furnish is believed to be no more than about 5 h. On the other hand, previous research works on bonding of wood elements with pMDI allude to the growth of an interpenetrating network (IPN) of cross-linked polyurea as being responsible for the high bonding capacity with pMDI and that this is enhanced with long pre-cure times (greater than 10-15 h). There was no evidence that this effect enhances the strength of OSB made from shortleaf pine, as boards pressed after a delay of 10 or more hours after blending were significantly lower in internal bond (IB) strength than those pressed within half an hour of blending. However, after a reduction of approximately 28% between 0 and 10 h, IB remained relatively stable with open assembly times up to 18 h, suggesting the potential for recycling such strands by partial substitution of them with freshly blended strands. The discrepancy between our findings and the pMDI bonding theory based on previous small-scale laboratory experiments was thought to have arisen from differences in resin distribution on the strands due to their different methods of application, and the cure temperature and moisture conditions in the core of boards being sub-optimal for the formation of an extensive network of fully cross-linked polyurea.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2000. Annual book of ASTM standards; Section 4. ASTM D-1037-Construction (Wood). Vol. 04.01. West Conshohocken, PA.nBao, S., W. A. Danuch, Y. Sun, P. L. Rinaldi, J. J. Marcinko and C. C. Phanopoulos. 2003. Solid state two-dimensional NMR studies of polymeric di-phenylmethane di-isocyanate (pMDI) reaction in wood. Forest Prod. J.53(6):63-71.nChelak, W. and W. H. Newman. 1991. MDI high moisture content bonding mechanism, parameters, and benefits of using MDI in composite wood products. Pages 205-229 in T. M. Maloney, ed. Proc. 25th Washington State University International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium, WSU, Pullman, WA.nDeppe, H. J. 1977. Technical progress in using isocyanates as an adhesive in particleboard manufacture. Pages 177-184 in T. M. Maloney, ed. Proc. 11th Washington State University International Symposium of Particleboard, WSU, Pullman, WA.nFrazier, C. E. and J. Ni. 1998. On the occurrence of network interpenetration in the wood-isocyanate adhesive interphase. Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives18(2):81-87.nFrazier, C. E., R. Schmidt and J. Ni. 1996. Towards a molecular understanding of the wood-isocyanate adhesive bondline. Pages 383-391 in Proc. 3rd Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composites Symposium, Dec. 2-5, Kyoto, Japan.nJohns, W. E. 1980. Is there an isocyanate in your future? Chemical aspects. Pages 13-31 in T. M. Maloney, ed. Proc. 14th Washington State University International Symposium of Particleboard, WSU, Pullman WA.nMarcinko, J. J., W. H. Newman, and C. Phanopoulos. 1994. The nature of the MDI/wood bond in Proc. 2nd Bio-Based Composites Symposium, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.nMarcinko, J. J., S. Devathala, P. L. Rinaldi, and S. Bao. 1998. Investigating the molecular and bulk dynamics of pMDI/wood and UF/wood composites. Forest Prod. J.48(6):81-84.nMarcinko, J. J., P.L. Rinaldi, and S. Bao. 1999. Exploring the physicochemical nature of pMDI/wood structural composite adhesion. Forest Prod. J.49(5):75-78.nRosthauser, J. W., K. W. Hider, R.N. Hunmt, and W. S. Gustavich. 1997. Chemistry of polymeric MDI wood binders-model studies. Pages 161-175, in T. M. Maloney, ed. Proc. 31st Washington State University International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium, WSU, Pullman, WA.nRowell, R.M. and W. D. Ellis. 1979. Chemical modification of wood: Reaction of methyl isocyanate with southern pine. Wood Science12(1):52-58.nSachs, H. I. 1997. Bonding of forest and agricultural residues. Pages 616-622 in Polyurethane Handbook, 2nd ed., Gunter Oertel, ed. Hanser Publishers, Munich, Germany. 688 pp.nShi, S. Q. and D. J. Gardner. 2001. Dynamic wettability of wood. Wood Fiber Sci.33(1):58-68.nSmith, G. D. 2004. The effect of some process variables on the lap-shear strength of aspen strands uniformly coated with pMDI resin. Wood Fiber Sci.36(2):228-238.nWendler, S. L. and C. E. Frazier. 1996a. Effect of moisture content on the isocyanate/wood adhesive bondline by N CP/MAS NMR. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.61:775-782.nWendler, S. L. and C. E. Frazier. 1996b. The effect of cure temperature and time on the isocyanate-wood adhesive bondline by N CP/MAS NMR. Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives16:179-186.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions