Permeability and Capillary Structure of Chinese Woods
Keywords:Permeability, capillary structure, Chinese woods, pine, birch, spruce
AbstractAxial permeability measurements of Chinese spruce, pine, and birch were made over a range of average pressure from 1.6 to 54 cm Hg. Linear plots of permeability vs. reciprocal mean pressure were obtained for spruce and pine in agreement with the Klinkenberg equation. Pit-opening radii were calculated from the intercepts and slopes, and the number of openings per cm2 of cross section were determined based on an assumed pit-membrane thickness of 0.1 μm. The plot of permeability vs. reciprocal mean pressure of the birch was curvilinear, indicating the presence of two conductances in series, which were assumed to be vessels and perforation plates. The calculated vessel radius and vessel concentration were in good agreement with data presented by Cheng (1980).
Cheng jun-Qing. 1980. Tropical and subtropical limbers of China-Identification properties and utilization. Science Press.nComstock, G. L. 1967. Longitudinal permeability of wood to gases and nonswelling liquids. For. Prod. J. 17(10):41-46.nCôté, W. A., and R. L. Krahmer. 1962. The permeability of coniferous pits demonstrated by electron microscopy. Tappi 45(2):119-122.nCôté, W. A., Z. Koran, and A. C. Day. 1964. Replica techniques for electron microscopy of wood and paper. Tappi 47(8):477-484.nLiese, W. 1965. Cellular ultrastructure of woody plants. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.nMegraw, R. A. 1967. A hydrodynamic particulate approach to pit membrane pore size distribution. For. Prod. J. 17(11):29-38.nPetty, J. A. 1970. Permeability and structure of the wood of Sitka spruce. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B175:149-166.nPetty, J. A. 1978. Fluid flow through the vessels of birch wood. J. Exp. Bot. 29(113):1463-1469.nPetty, J. A. 1981. Fluid flow through the vessels and intervascular pits of sycamore wood. Holzforschung 35:213-216.nPetty, J. A., and R. D. Preston. 1969. The dimensions and number of pit membrane pores in conifer wood. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B172:137-151.nSebastian, L. P., W. A. Côté, and C. Skaar. 1965. Relationship of gas phase permeability to ultrastructure of white spruce wood. For. Prod. J. 15(9):394-404.nSiau, J. F. 1969. Corrections for gas permeability measurement by the volume displacement method. For. Prod. J. 19(6):36-37.nSiau, J. F. 1971. Flow in wood. Syracuse University Press.nSiau, J. F. 1984. Transport processes in wood. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.nSiau, J. F, Y. Kanagawa, and J. A. Petty. 1981. The use of permeability and capillary theory to characterize the structure of wood and membrane filters. Wood Fiber 13(1):2-12.nStamm, A. J. 1932. An electrical conductivity method for determining the effective capillary dimensions of wood. J. Phys. Chemistry 36(1):312-325.nStamm, A. J. 1935. The effect of changes in the equilibrium relative vapor pressure upon the capillary structure of wood. U.S. For. Prod. Lab. Rep. No. R1075.nStamm, A. J. and E. Wagner. 1961. Determining the distribution of interstructural openings in wood. For. Prod. J. 11 (3):141-144.nThomas, R. J., and D. D. Nicholas. 1966. Pit membrane structure in loblolly pine as influenced by solvent-exchange drying. For Prod. J. 16(3):53-56.nYao, J., and A. J. Stamm. 1967. Validity of determining pit pore sizes in softwoods by surface tension resistance with rate of flow. For. Prod. J. 17(2):33-40.nZellnick, H. E., N. E. Sandak, and R. S. Davis. 1962. Gradient search optimization. Chem. Eng. Progr. 58(8):35-41.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.