Thermal Effects On Load-Duration Behavior Of Lumber. Part I. Effect Of Constant Temperature
Keywords:Load-duration, creep-rupture, temperature, lumber, Douglas-fir, bending, failure, modeling
AbstractThe effect of constant thermal loadings on the load-duration relationships for structural lumber in bending is presented. Select Structural and No. 2 grade Douglas-fir nominal 2 by 4 (38.1 mm by 88.9 mm) beams were tested in bending under constant load. Constant temperature environments of 73 F, 100 F, and 130 F (22.8 C, 37.8 C, and 54.4 C) were used in the investigation. A constant 50% relative humidity (RH) was maintained for each temperature. The applied bending loads were based on the 15th percentile of the assumed static strength distributions for each grade at 73 F and 50% RH. An exponential damage accumulation model modified to account for temperature effects is used to define the load-duration response. The results indicate shorter times-to-failure with corresponding higher probabilities of failure for equal levels of mechanical stress as the temperature is increased.
Barrett, J. D., and R. O. Foschi. 1978a. Duration of load and probability of failure in wood. Part I: Modelling creep rupture. Canadian J. Civ. Eng. 5(4):505-514.nBarrett, J. D., and R. O. Foschi, 1978b. Duration of load and probability of failure in wood. Part II: Constant, ramp, and cyclic loadings. Canadian J. Civ. Eng. 5(4):515-532.nFoschi, Ricardo O., and J. David Barrett. 1982. Load-duration effects in western hemlock lumber. J. Structural Division, ASCE 108(ST7):1494-1510.nGerhards, C. C. 1977. Effect of duration and rate of loading on strength of wood and wood-based materials. USDA, Forest Serv. Res. Pap. FPL 283. Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nGerhards, C. C. 1979. Time-related effects on wood strength: A linear cumulative damage theory. Wood Sci. 11(3):139-144.nGerhards, C. C. 1982. Characteristics of Douglas-fir 2 by 4 duration of load samples. Unpublished report, USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nGerhards, C. C. 1988. Effect of grade on load duration of Douglas-fir in bending. Wood Fiber Sci. 20(1): 146-161.nGerhards, C. C, and C. L. Link. 1987. A cumulative damage model to predict load duration characteristics of lumber. Wood Fiber Sci. 19(2): 147-164.nHwang, W., and K. S. Han. 1986. Cumulative damage models and multi-stress fatigue life prediction. J. Composite Mat. 20:125-153.nJohns, Kenneth, and Borg Madsen. 1982. Duration of load effects in lumber. Part I: A fracture mechanics approach. Canadian J. Civ. Eng. 9:502-514.nMadsen, Borg. 1971. Duration of load tests for dry lumber subjected to bending. For. Prod. J. 23(2):21-28.nMadsen, Borg, 1982. Duration of load effects in lumber. Part II: Experimental data. Canadian J. Civ. Eng. 9:515-525.nMiner, Milton A. 1945. Cumulative damage in fatigue. J. Applied Mech., ASME 12(3):A159- A164.nMurphy, Joseph F. 1982. Discussion of "Load-duration effects in western hemlock lumber," by Ricardo O. Foschi and J. David Barrett. J. Structural Eng., ASCE 109(12):2943-2946.nNational Forest Products Association (NFPA). 1986. National design specifications for wood construction. NFPA, Washington, D.C.nSchniewind, Arno P. 1967. Creep-rupture life of Douglas-fir under cyclic environmental conditions. Wood Sci. Technol. 1(4):278-288.nSchniewind, Arno P, and Duane E. Lyon. 1973. Further experiments on creep-rupture life under cyclic environmental conditions. Wood Fiber 4(4):334-341.nWood, Lyman W. 1951. Relation of strength of wood to duration of load. USDA, Forest Serv., Rep. No. 1916. Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.