A Satistical Characterization of The Horizontal Density Distribution in Flakeboard
Keywords:Density distribution, structure, particleboard, wood composites
AbstractStudies reported on the horizontal density distribution (HDD) of wood composites and paper materials are reviewed. The literature suggests that for wood composites a concept for quantifying the HDD has yet to be established. The variation of HDD is shown to decrease as the specimen size increases. When determined within the less sensitive range, the horizontal density variation is likely a reflection of the forming nonuniformity, while the variation exhibited at smaller specimen sizes is caused mainly by voids present in the board structure. A model is established to relate the magnitude of HDD, as quantified by the standard deviation, to the specimen size based on a density variation phenomenon and statistical considerations.
Bendat, J. S., and A. G. Piersol. 1980. Engineering applications of correlation and spectral analysis. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.nCorte, H. 1969. On the distribution of the mass density in paper: Part I. Theoretical basis. Das Papier 23(7): 381-393.nCorte, H. 1970. On the distribution of the mass density in paper: Part II. Results on unfilled papers. Das Papier 24(5):261-271.nCorte, H. 1982. The structure of paper. Pages 175-282 in H. F. Rance, ed. Handbook of paper sciences II. The structure and physical properties of paper. Elsevier Pub. Co., Oxford, UK.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1993. Compression behavior of randomly formed wood flake mats. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(4):349-358.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1994. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part II. Modelling and simulation of a randomly formed flake layer network. Wood Sci. Technol. 28:135-146.nFisher, R. A. 1950. Statistical methods for research worker. Eleventh edition—revised. Oliver and Boyd, Hafner Pub. Co., New York, NY.nKallmes, O., and H. Corte. 1960. The structure of paper: I. The statistical geometry of an ideal two-dimensional network. TAPPI 43(9):737-752.nKelly, M. W. 1977. Critical literature review of relationship between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-10. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nKuehl, R. O., and D. L. Kittock. 1969. Estimate of optimum plot size for cotton yield trials. Agron. J. 61: 584-586.nKusian, R. 1968. Model investigations about the influence of particle size on structure and strength properties of particle materials: I. Theoretical considerations. Holztechnologie 9(3):189-196.nLecacheux, P. 1953. Theoretical study of tensile strength of paper and boards. Papeterie 75(10):659-673.nNelson, L. A. 1981. Yield variability on proso millet due to plot size. Agron. J. 73(1):23-25.nSeth, R. S. 1990. Fiber quality factors in papermaking: I. The importance of fiber length and width. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 197:125-141.nSeth, R. S. 1993. Personal communication.nSmith, H. F. 1938. An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops. J. Agric. Sci. 28:1-23.nSoszynski, R. M., and R. S. Seth. 1985. Improving the strength of linerboard. 1985. Proc. International Packaging Conference, Beijing, China. Pp. 590-604.nSuchsland, O. 1959. An analysis of the particleboard process. Q. Bull., Mich. Agric. Exp. Sta., Michigan State Univ. 45(11):104-121.nSuchsland, O., and H. Xu. 1989. A simulation of the horizontal density distribution in a flakeboard. Forest Prod. J. 39(5):29-33.nSuchsland, O., and H. Xu. 1991a. Model analysis of flakeboard variables. Forest Prod. J. 41(11/12):55-60.nSuchsland, O., and H. Xu. 1991b. Model analysis of the particle bonding process. Presented at Adhesive and Bonded Wood Symposium. Seattle, WA.nVanmarcke, E. H. 1984. Random fields:Analysis and synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.nXu, W. 1993. Horizontal density distribution of particleboard:Origin and implications. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.nZhang, R., A. Warrick, and D. E. Myers. 1990. Variance as a function of sample support size. Math. Geol. 22(1):107-121.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.