Bark/Wood Bond Strength and its Association with Material and Environmental Variables

Authors

  • G. A. Moore
  • T. A. McMahon

Keywords:

Bark/wood bond, seasonal variation, chip/bark segregation

Abstract

Bark/wood bond strength was determined for the following Australian grown species: Pinus radiata. Eucalyptus obliqua, and a mixture of E. viminalis and E. rubida. In addition, sixteen other variables describing tree vigor, drought stress, tree size, and material properties were measured. The experiment was conducted in three seasons. and seasonal variation of bond strength was shown for these species.

Seasonal variation in bond strength was similar to that found by other workers. The sapwood moisture content of the eucalypts had a low variability over the seasons. Correlations were found between bond strength and the material variables for the pines sampled in summer and the eucalypts.

References

Anderson, R. L., and T. A. Bancroft. 1952. Statistical theory in research. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.nBalodis, V. 1981. Assessment of the pulpwood quality of forest resources. C.S.I.R.O. Division of Chemical Technology, Research Review 1980. Part 1:13-32.nBalodis, V., and I. R. James. 1980. Sampling of wood resources for pulpwood quality assessment. 1. Sampling theory. APPITA 34(2): 113-118.nBarnett, J. R. 1973. Seasonal variation in the ultra structure of the cambium in New Zealand grown Pinus radiata D. Don. Ann. Bot. 37(153): 1005-1011.nBerlyn, R. W. 1965. Some variations in the strength of the bond between bark and wood. Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada, Technical Report 393.nChaney, W. R. 1981. Sources of water. Pages 1-40 in T. T. Kozlowski, ed. Water deficits and plant growth. Academic Press, New York.nEinspahr, D. W., and M. L. Harder. 1983. Wood/bark adhesion measurements assist in drum barker development. For. Prod. J. 33(5):21.nFiscus, M., R. H. Van Eperen, and D. W. Einspahr. 1983. Method for obtaining wood/bark adhesion measurements on small samples. Wood Fiber Sci. 15(3):219-222.nFridley, R. B., G. K. Brown, and P. A. Adrian. 1970. Strength characteristics of fruit tree bark. Hilgardia 40(8):205-223.nGoggans, J. F. 1961. The interplay of environment and heredity as factors controlling wood properties. North Carolina State College, School of Forestry, Technical Report II.nMadden, J. L. 1977. Direct evaluation of cambial activity in trees. Australian For. Res. 7:145-150.nMiller, D. J. 1975. Treatments to loosen bark. For. Prod. J. 25(11):49-56.nMorrison, D. F. 1976a. Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill. P. 253.nMorrison, D. F. 1976b. Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill. P. 259.nRao, C. R. 1965. Linear statistical inference and its applications. John Wiley & Sons. Pp. 362-365.nTurner, N. C. 1981. Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil 58:339-366.nWaring, R. H., and S. W. Running. 1978. Sapwood water storage; its contribution to transpiration and effect upon water conductance through the stems of old growth Douglas fir. Plant, Cell and Environment 1(2): 131-140.nWilcox, H., F. Czabator, and G. Girolami. 1954. Seasonal variation in bark peeling characteristics of some Adirondack pulpwood species. J. For. 52(5):338-342.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-28

Issue

Section

Research Contributions