Soft-Rot Capabilities of the Major Microfungi, Isolated from Douglas-Fir Poles in the Northeast
Keywords:
Decay, soft rot, microfungi, utility poles, Douglas-fir, CCA, penta and oil, basidiomycetesAbstract
Four hundred seventeen fungi were isolated from 144 of the 163 Douglas-fir poles (ages 7 to 17 years and treatments CCA, penta and oil, or CellonĀ®) sampled from transmission lines or storage piles in New York and Pennsylvania. Microfungi predominated and comprised nearly 85% of all isolates. They were isolated primarily from treated zones and were most abundant in older CCA-treated poles in transmission lines. Antrodia carbonica and Postia placenta were the principal basidiomycete decayers and isolated primarily from untreated zones in CCA-treated poles. A limited number of white-rot fungi were isolated from the treated and untreated zones of several poles.
Seven of the 12 principal microfungi were established to have soft-rot capabilities. Soft rot was detected anatomically in 23 of the 144 poles in transmission lines. In most cases it was superficial and limited to several outer annual rings; however, it was severe in older CCA-treated poles and involved all of the treated zone and extended several centimeters radially into the untreated zone. Also, soft rot was detected anatomically and soft-rot fungi culturally, in 8 of 12 13-year-old CCA-treated poles that had been fumigated with Vapam 5 or 6 years previously. None was detected in the fumigated penta-treated poles.
These data suggest that soft-rot fungi play an important role in decay development in the treated groundline zone of utility poles and should be considered in decay detection programs (culturally) and decisions on the timing of remedial treatments.
References
ANSI. 1979. Specifications and dimensions for wood poles. ANSI 05.1, American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York.nDaniel, G. F., and T. Nilsson. 1988. Studies on preservative tolerant Phialophora species. Inter. Biodet. 24:327-335.nDickinson, D. V., N. A. Sorkhoh, and J. F. Levy. 1976. The effect of microdistribution of wood preservatives on the performance of treated wood. Ann. Conv. Br. Wood Pres. Assoc., Rec. 1976: 25-40.nDuncan, C. G. 1960. Wood attacking capacities and physiology of soft-rot fungi. U.S. Forest Prod. Lab. Rep. 2173.nEslyn, W. E. 1970. Utility pole decay. II. Basidiomycetes associated with decay in poles. Wood Sci. Tech. 4:97-103.nGams, W., and M. R. McGinnis. 1983. Phialemonium, a new anamorph genus intermediate between Phialophora and Acremonium.Mycologia 75(6):977-987.nGraham, R. D., and G. G. Helsing. 1979. Wood pole maintenance manual: Inspection and supplemental treatment of Douglas-fir and western red cedar poles. Res. Bull. 24. For. Res. Lab., Oregon State University. 59 pp.nGreaves, H. 1977. Progress towards controlling soft rot of treated hardwood poles in Australia, IRG/WP/289.nHenningsson, B. T., T. Nilsson, P. Hoffmeyer, H. Friis-Hanson, L. Schmidt, and S. Jacobsson. 1975. Soft rot in salt treated electricity poles from the years 1940-1954. Swedish Wood Pres. Inst. Nr. 117.nKropp, B. R., and M. E. Corden. 1986. Morphology and taxonomy of Pachnocybe ferruginea. Mycologia 78(3):334-342.nLeightley, L. E. 1980. Further studies on soft-rot decay in C. C. A. treated Eucalyptus power transmission poles in Queensland, Australia, IRG/WP/1115.nLevy, C. R. 1978. Soft rot. Proc. Amer. Wood Pres. Assoc. 74:145-164.nMeyer, R. W., R. A. Zabel, C. J. K. Wang, and F. C. Terracina. 1988. Wood pole decay characterization. Volume 2. Soft rot characteristics and an identification manual for the decay fungi in utility poles in New York. The Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, EP 84-5, Final Report, New York.nMorrell, J. J., M. E. Corden, R. D. Graham, B. R. Kropp, P. Przybylowicz, S. M. Smith, and C. A. Sexton. 1987. Basidiomycete colonization of air-seasoned, Douglas-fir poles. Proc. Amer. Wood Pres. Assoc. 83:284-296.nMorrell, J. J., and S. M. Smith. 1988. Fungi colonizing redwood in cooling towers: Identities and effects on wood properties. Wood Fiber Sci. 20(2):243-249.nNilsson, T. 1973. Studies on wood degradation and cellulolytic activity of microfungi. Studia Forestalia Sueica Nr. 104, Stockholm, 40 pp.nNilsson, T., and B. Henningsson. 1978. Phialophora species occurring in preservative treated wood in ground contact. Mat. Organ. 13:297-313.nPolishook, J. D. 1982. The fungal flora of untreated and recently treated utility poles of southern yellow pine. M.S. thesis, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York.nRayner, A. D. M., and L. Boddy. 1988. Fungal decomposition of wood: Its biology and ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 587 pp.nSokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 776 pp.nWang, C. J. K., and R. A. Zabel, eds. 1990. Identification manual for fungi from utility poles in the eastern United States. American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD. 356 pp.nWang, C. J. K., F. C. Terracina, and R. A. Zabel. 1989. Fumigant effectiveness in creosote- and pentatreated southern pine poles. Electric Power Research Institute, EL-6197, Project 1471-2 Final Report, Palo Alto, CA.nWilcox, W. W. 1964. Preparation of decayed wood for microscopical examination. USDA For. Ser. For. Prod. Lab. Res. Note FPL-056, 22 pp.nZabel, R. A., F. F. Lombard, and A. M. Kenderes. 1980. Fungi associated with decay in treated Douglas-fir transmission poles in Northeastern United States. For. Prod. J. 30(4):51-56.nZabel, R. A., C. J. K. Wang, and F. C. Terracina. 1982. The fungal associates, detection, and fumigant control of decay in treated southern pine poles. Electric Power Research Institute, EL-2768, Project 1471-1 Final Report, Palo Alto, CA.nZabel, R. A., F. F. Lombard, C. J. K. Wang, and F. Terracina. 1985. Fungi associated with decay in treated southern pine utility poles in the eastern United States. Wood Fiber Sci. 17(1):75-91.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.