An Assessment of Carbon Pools, Storage, and Wood Products Market Substitution Using Life-Cycle Analysis Results
Keywords:
Wood products, market substitution, carbon pools, avoided emissionsAbstract
The study utilized the results from a life-cycle assessment (LCA) of housing construction to analyze forest products' role in energy displacement and carbon cycling. It analyzed the behavior of three carbon pools associated with forest products: the forest, forest products, and fossil fuel displaced by forest products in end-use markets. The LCA provided data that allowed us to create an accounting system that tracked carbon from sequestration to substitution in forest product end-use markets. The accounts are time-dependent since the size of the carbon pools is influenced by harvest timing; hence the size of each pool is estimated under alternative harvesting scenarios and presented over time. The analysis of the alternative harvesting scenarios resulted in shorter harvest cycles and provided the largest carbon pools when all three pools were considered together. The study concluded that forest products led to a significant reduction in atmospheric carbon by displacing more fossil fuel-intensive products in housing construction. The result has important policy implications since any incentive to manage forest lands to produce a greater amount of forest products would likely increase the share of lands positively contributing to a reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.References
Aber, J. D., and J. M. Melillo. 1991. Terrestrial ecosystems. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, PA.nBirdsey, R. A. 1992. Carbon storage in trees and forests. Pp. 23-40 in R. Neil Sampson and Dwight Hair, eds. Forest and Global Change: Opportunities for increasing forest cover (vol. 1), American Forests, Washington, DC.nBirdsey, R. A. 1996. Carbon storage for major types and regions in the conterminous United States, Pages 1-26 in R.N Sampson and D. Hair, eds. Forests and global change: Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions (vol. 2). Amer. For., Washington, DC.nBorjesson, P., and L. Gustavsson. 2000. Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: Wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy 28:575-588.nBowyer, J., D. Briggs, B. Lippke, J. Perez-Garcia, and J. Wilson. 2004. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction: CORRIM Phase I Research Report. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 600+ pp.nBurshel, P., E. Kursten, B. C. Larson, and M. Weber. 1993. Present role of German forests and forestry in the national carbon budget and options to its increase. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 70:325-349.nCanary, J. D., R. B. Harrison, J. E Compton, and H. N. Chappell. 2000. Additional carbon sequestration following repeated urea fertilization of second growth Douglasfir stands in Western Washington. For. Ecol. Mgmt. 138: 225-232.nCooper, C. F. 1983. Carbon storage in managed forests. Can. J. For. Res. 13:155-166.nDewar, R. C. 1990. A model of carbon storage in forests and forest products. Tree Physiol. 6:416-28.nEdmonds, R. L. 1979. Decomposition and nutrient release in Douglas-fir needle litter in relation to stand development. Can. J. For. R. 9:132-140.nFranklin, J. F., D. R. Berg, D. A. Thornburgh, and J. C. Tappeiner. 1997. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: Variable retention harvest systems. Pp. 165-170 in K. A. Kohm, and J. F. Franklin, Tech. eds. Creating a forestry for the 21st century: The science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC.nGholtz, H. L. 1982. Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area, and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecol. 63:469-481.nGlover, J., D. O. White, and T. A. G. Langrish. 2002. Wood versus concrete and steel in house construction: A life cycle assessment. J. Forestry 100:34-41.nGrier, C. C., and R. S. Logan. 1977. Old-growth Pseudotsuga menziesii communities of a western Oregon watershed: Biomass distribution and production budgets. Ecol. Monogr. 47:373-400.nHarmon, M. E., W. K. Ferrel, and J. F Franklin. 1990. Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247:699-702.nHarmon, M. E., W. K. Ferrel, J. M. Harmon, W. K. Ferrel, and D. Brooks. 1996. Modeling carbon stores in Oregon and Washington forest products: 1900-1992. Climate Change 33:521-550.nHarmon, M. E., and J. Sexton. 1996. Guidelines for measurements of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. U.S. LTER Publication No. 20, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 73 pp.nHoughton, R. A., J. E. Hobbie, J. M. Melillo, B. Moore, B. J. Peterson, G. R. Shaver and G. M. Woodwell. 1983. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: A net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol. Monogr. 53:235-262.nIPPC 2001. IPCC third assessment report: Climate change 2001. Geneva, Switzerland.nKershaw, J. A. Jr., C. D. Oliver, and T. M. Hinckley. 1993. Effects of harvest of old-growth Douglas-fir stands and subsequent management on carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere. J. Sustain. For. 1:61-77.nKoch, P. 1991. Wood vs. non-wood materials in U.S. residential construction: Some energy related international implications. CINTRAFOR Working paper #36. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nKohlmaier, G. H., M. Weber, and R. A. Houghton. 1998. Carbon dioxide mitigation in forestry and the wood industry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.nMusselnman, R. C., and D. G. Fox. 1991. A review of the role of temperate forests in the global CO2 balance. J. Air Waste Mgmt. 41:798-807.nMeil, J., B. Lippke, J., Perez-Garcia, J. Bowyer, and J. Wilson. 2004. Environmental impacts of a single family building shell-from harvest to construction. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module J. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 38 pp.nOliver, C. D. 1992. A landscape approach: Achieving and maintaining biodiversity and economic productivity. J. Forestry 90:20-25.nPerez-Garcia, J., B. Lippke, J. Comnick, and C. Manriquez. 2004. Tracking carbon from substitution in the forest to wood products and substitution. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module N. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction: University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 27 pp.nSampson, R. N., and R. Sedjo. 1997. Economics of carbon sequestration in forestry: An overview. Critical Review in Environmental Science and Technology 27:s1-s8.nSchlamadinger, B., and G. Marland. 1996. The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Energy 10(5/6):275-300.nSpies, T. A., J. F. Franklin, and T. B. Thomas. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69:1689-1702.nTurner, D. P., G. J. Koerper, M. Harmon, and J. J. Lee. 1995. A carbon budget for forests of the conterminous United States. Ecological Appl. 5(2):421-36.nWinjum, J. K., S. Brown, and B. Schlamadinger. 1998. Forest harvest and wood products: Sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide. For. Sci. 44(2):272-284.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
