Lateral Load-Carrying Connection Properties and Withdrawal Capacity of Hybrid Poplar
Keywords:
Yield models, oriented strandboard, dowel bearing strength, laminated products, National Design SpecificationAbstract
An experimental study is reported aimed at determining the yield load, withdrawal capacity, and validity of National Design Specification (NDS) yield models on connections between hybrid poplar and common sheathing materials using a dowel-type fastener. Plantation-grown hybrid poplar (Pacific Albus) was procured, and connections with two different thicknesses of oriented strandboard and plywood were constructed using a dowel-type fastener. The NDS does not list connection design values for low-density wood species. Therefore, it was important to validate the NDS yield model equations for applicability toward a low-density species such as hybrid poplar. The results quantify the lateral load-carrying and withdrawal capacities of hybrid poplar. Also, the prediction using NDS yield models consistently matched the observed yield loads and yield modes for all the sheathing types used in this study. The data suggest that the NDS yield model is an adequate tool for connection design even for low-density species, provided knowledge of dowel-bearing capacity of the hybrid poplar is known.References
AFPA (1999) General dowel equations for calculating lateral connection values. Technical Report 12. American Forest and Paper Association, Washington, DC.nAFPA (2012) National design specification® for wood construction. American Forest and Paper Association, Washington, DC.nASTM (2007a) F 1575. Standard test method for determining bending yield moment of nails. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2007b) D 1761. Standard test method for mechanical fasteners in wood. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2007c) D 5764. Standard test method for evaluating dowel-bearing strength of wood and wood-base products, D 5764. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nAune P, Patton-Mallory M (1986a) Lateral load bearing capacity of nailed joints based on the yield theory: Theoretical development. Res Pap FPL-469. USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI.nAune P, Patton-Mallory M (1986b) Lateral load-bearing capacity of nailed joints based on the yield theory: Experimental verification. Res Pap FPL-470. USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI.nBalatinecz JJ, Kretschmann DE, Leclercq A (2001) Achievements in the utilization of poplar wood—Guideposts for the future. For Chron 77:265-269.nBeaudoin M, Hernández RE, Koubaa A, Poliquin J (1992) Interclonal, intraclonal and within-tree variation in wood density of poplar hybrid clones. Wood Fiber Sci 24:147-153.nBendtsen BA, Maeglin RR, Deneke F (1981) Comparison of mechanical and anatomical properties of eastern cottonwood and populous hybrid NE-237. Wood Sci 14(1):1-15.nBlass HJ, Ehlbeck J, Rouger F (1999) Simplified design of joints with dowel-type fasteners. Pages 275-279 in Proc Pacific Timber Engineering Conference, March 14-18, 1999, Rotorua, New Zealand. Forest Research Institute Limited, Rotorua, New Zealand.nFPL (2010) Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-190. USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 508 pp.nHall RB, Hilton GD, Maynard CA (1982) Construction lumber from hybrid aspen plantations in the central states. J Forestry 80(5):291-294.nJohansen KW (1949) Theory of timber connectors. Publication No. 9, International Association of Bridges and Structural Engineering, Bern, Switzerland. Pages 249-262.nKent SM, Leichti RJ, Rosowsky DV, Morrell JJ (2004) Effect of wood decay by Postia placenta on the lateral capacity of nailed oriented strandboard sheathing and douglas-fir framing members. Wood Fiber Sci 36(4):560-572.nKoubaa A, Hernández RE, Beaudoin M, Poliquin J (1998) Interclonal, intraclonal, and within-tree variation in fiber length of poplar hybrid clones. Wood Fiber Sci 30:40-47.nKramer A, Barbosa AR, Sinha A (2013) Viability of hybrid poplar in ANSI approved cross-laminated timber applications. J Mater Civ Eng (In press).nKretschmann DE, Isebrands JG, Stanosz G, Dramm JR, Olstad A, Cole D, Samsel J (1999) Structural lumber properties of hybrid poplar. Res Pap FPL-RP-573 USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 8 pp.nLaw S (2011) A crumpling paper industry. Once-mighty Oregon industry losing to mills overseas. The Portland Tribune (online issue). Portland, OR. http://www.chinasubsidies.com/portland-tribune-march2011.pdf (August 11, 2011). http://www.chinasubsidies.com/portland-tribune-march2011.pdf'>http://www.chinasubsidies.com/portland-tribune-march2011.pdfnMátyás C, Peszlen I (1997) Effect of age on selected wood quality traits of poplar clones. Silvae Genet 46:64-72.nOWIC (2011) Properties of hybrid poplar. Oregon Wood Innovation Center report, Corvallis, OR. http://owic.oregonstate.edu/'>http://owic.oregonstate.edu/nPeyer SM, Cramer SM (1999) Behavior of nailed connection at elevated temperature. Wood Fiber Sci 31(3):264-276.nSinha A, Gupta R, Nairn JA (2011) Thermal degradation of lateral yield strength of nailed wood connections. J Mater Civ Eng 23(6):812-822.nSinha A, Miyamoto BT (2013) Lateral load carrying capacity of laminated bamboo lumber to oriented strand board connections. J Mater Civ Eng (in press).nTheilen RD, Bender DA, Pllock DG, Winistorfer SG (1998) Lateral resistance of ring-shank nail connections in Southern Pine lumber. Trans ASAE 41(2):465-472.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.