Cell-Wall Density of Douglas-Fir by Two Optometric Methods

Authors

  • J. T. Quirk

Keywords:

Specific gravity, cell-wall density, cell-wall area, cell-wall shrinkage, optometric measurements, Douglas-fir

Abstract

The change in cell-wall density from the water-swollen (1.0 g/cm3) to the oven-dry (1.43 g/cm3) condition is a function of the percent of shrinkage in the cell wall. Cell-wall density obtained opto-metrically by the Dual-Linear measuring micrometer and the dot-grid eyepiece compared favorably with densities reported for mercury porisimeter or picnometric techniques. Both optometric techniques are nondestructive and offer advantages over destructive techniques. Void volumes in the dry cell wall were calculated to be approximately 3.5%, fiber saturation point for extractive-free cell wall about 35%, Average interfibrillar spacing in the water-swollen condition was 20 Å for both earlywood and latewood and in the dry wall: spacing was 4.7 Å for earlywood and 8.3 Å for latewood.

References

Berlyn, G. P. 1964. Recent advances in wood anatomy: The cell walls of secondary xylem. For. Prod. J.14(10):467-476.nBerlyn, G. P. 1970. Ultrastructural and molecular concepts of cell-wall formation. Wood Fiber2(3): 196-227.nBesley, L. 1964. The significance of fiber geometry and distribution in assessing pulpwood quality. Tappi47(11):183A-184A.nBoutelje, J. 1962. On shrinkage and change in microscopic void volume during drying as calculated from measurements on microtome cross-sections of Swedish Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Svensk Paperstid.65:209-215.nBryan, M. M. 1943. Area determination with the modified acreage grid. J. For.41(10):764-766.nChristensen, G. N., and H. F. A. Hergt. 1968. The apparent density of wood in non-swelling liquids. Holzforschung22(6):165-170.nChudnoff, M., and K. Tischler. 1963. Fiber morphology of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. and the relation of wood anatomy to certain physical and mechanical properties. Israel Forest. Assoc. Hanoth. La-Yaaran. Supplement I. pp. 3-23.nFeist, W. C., and H. Tarkow. 1967. Polymer exclusion in wood substance, a new procedure for measuring fiber saturation points. For. Prod. J.17(10):65-68.nFrey-Wyssling. A. 1968. The ultrastructure of wood. Wood Sci. Technol.2:73-83.nHarris, J. M. 1969. The use of beta rays in determining wood properties. Part 4, Estimating the thickness of tracheid cell walls. N.Z. J. Sci.12(2):432-442.nJayme, G., and T. Krause. 1963. Über die Packungsdichte der Zellwäande in Laubhölzern. Holz Roh- Werkst.21(1):14-19.nKellogg, R. M., and G. Ifju. 1962. Influence of specific gravity and certain other factors on the tensile properties of wood. For. Prod. J.12(10):463-470.nKellogg, R. M., and F. F. Wangaard. 1969. Variations in the cell-wall density of wood. Wood Fiber1(3): 180-204.nLadell, J. I. 1959. A method of measuring the amount and distribution of cell wall material in transverse microscope sections of wood. J. Inst. Wood Sci.3:43-46.nLange, P. W. 1958. The distribution of the chemical constituents throughout the cell wall. Pages 147-186 in F. Bolam. ed., Fundamentals of paper-making fibers. Trans. Symp. held at Cambridge in 1957.nMcIntosh, D. C. 1965. Wall structure of loblolly pine summerwood holocellulosse fibers in relation to individual fiber strength. Pages 561-571 in W. A. Côté, ed., Cellular ultrastructure of woody plants. Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse, NY.nNearn, W. T. 1955. Effect of water soluble extractives on the volumetric shrinkage and equilibrium moisture content of eleven tropical and domestic woods. Penn. State Univ., Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 598.nQuirk, J. T. 1975. Dot-grid integrating eyepiece: Two sampling techniques for estimating cell wall areas. Wood Sci.8(2)88-91.nQuirk, J. T. 1984. Shrinkage and related properties of cell walls of Douglas-fir. Wood Fiber Sci.16(1):115-133.nQuirk, J. T., and D. M. Smith. 1975. Comparison of Dual-Linear and dot-grid eyepiece methods for estimating wood properties of Douglas-fir. Wood Sci.8(2):92-96.nRollins, Mary L., and Verne W. Tripp. 1961. The architecture of cellulose: A microscopic review. For. Prod. J.11(11):493-504.nSmith, D. M. 1965. Rapid measurement of tracheid cross-sectional dimensions of conifers: Its application to specific gravity determinations. For. Prod. J.15(8):325-334.nSmith, D. M. 1967. Microscopic methods for determining cross-sectional cell dimensions. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. FPL 79. For. Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nSmith, D. M., and R. B. Miller. 1964. Methods of measuring and estimating tracheid wall thickness of redwood (Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.). Tappi47:599-604.nStamm, A. J. 1929. Density of wood substance and absorption by wood. J. Phys. Chem.33:398.nStamm, A. J. 1950. Specific volume of native cellulose. Textile Res. J.20(9):631-636.nStamm, A. J. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press Co., New York, NY.nStamm, A. J. 1967a. History of two phases of wood physics. Wood Sci. and Tech.1:186-190.nStamm, A. J. 1967b. Review of nine methods for determining the fiber saturation points of wood and wood products. Wood Sci.4(2):114-128.nStamm, A. J. 1971. Review of nine methods for determining the fiber saturation points of wood and wood products. Wood Sci.4(2):114-128.nStamm, A. J., and L. A. Hansen. 1937. Bonding force of cellulosic materials for water, from specific volume and thermal data. J. Phys. Chem.41(7):107-116.nStamm, A. J., and R. M. Seborg. 1935. Absorption compression of cellulose and wood. J. Phys. Chem.39:132.nStayton, C. L., and C. A. Hart. 1965. Determining pore size distribution in softwoods with a mercury porosimeter. For. Prod. J.15(10):435-440.nStone, J. E. 1964. The porous structure of wood and fibers. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can.65(1):T3-T12.nStone, J. E. 1966. The cell wall. Trend Mag. Activities of the Pulp and Paper Institute of Canada. No. 7:4-9. Spring.nStone, J. E., and A. M. Scallan. 1967. The effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. II. Swelling in water and the fiber saturation point. Tappi50(10):496-501.nStone, J. E., A. M. Scallan., and G. M. A. Aberson. 1966. The wall density of native cellulose fibers. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can.67(5):T263-268.nTrendelenburg, R. 1939. Über Fasersättigungsfeuchtigkeit, Schwindmass, und Raumdichtezahl wichtiger Holzarten. Holz Roh- Werkst.2(1):12-17.nTsoumis, G. 1964. Microscopic measurement of the amount of cell wall substance in wood and its relationship to specific gravity. Tappi47(1):675-677.nWangaard, F. F. 1969. Cell-wall density of wood with particular reference to the southern pines. Wood Sci.1(4):222-226.nWangaard, F. F., and L. A. Granados. 1967. The effect of extractives on water-vapor sorption of wood. Wood Sci. Technol.1:253-277.nWeathfrwax, R. C., and H. Tarkow. 1968a. Cell-wall density of dry wood. For. Prod. J.18(2): 83-85.nWeathfrwax, R. C., and H. Tarkow. 1968b. Density of wood substance. Importance of penetration and adsorption compression of the displacement fluid. For. Prod. J.18(7):44-46.nWilfong, J. G. 1964. Improved techniques for determining the specific gravity of wood substance. M.S. Thesis. Univ. North Carolina at Raleigh.nWilfong, J. G. 1966. Specific gravity of wood substance. For. Prod. J.16(1):55-61.nYiannos, P. N. 1964. The apparent cell-wall density of wood and pulp fibers. Tappi47(8):468-471.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-27

Issue

Section

Research Contributions