Wood Density and Fiber Length in Young <i>Populus</i> Stems: Relation to Clone, Age, Growth Rate, and Pruning
Keywords:
<i>Populus</i>, wood density, fiber length, ring width, clones, sampling height, pruningAbstract
Cross-sectional disks were cut at two stem heights (1.5 m and 3.0 m) from 9-year-old trees of three Populus clones grown in an intensively-cultured plantation in western Washington. At age 1.5 years, when the trees averaged 3.4 m tall, half of the trees were pruned by removing all branches below 1.8 m. Ring width, wood density, and fiber length were measured for each ring. Pruning had no effect on mean ring width or wood properties, averaged over the entire disk or on rings produced during the 2nd through the 4th years. Averaged over all trees, wood density of the 1.5-m sample was 0.37 g cm-3 during the first 3 years, decreased somewhat at age 4 or 5, and then increased to an average of 0.45 g cm-3 at age 9. Fiber length increased from 0.57 mm at age 1 to nearly 1.0 mm at age 9. Averaged over all disks at 1.5 m, clones differed significantly in ring width, wood density, and fiber length. Mean values for the two wood properties at 3.0 m were slightly lower than those at 1.5 m and did not differ significantly among clones. Within clone correlations between ring width and wood density or fiber length or between wood properties were low, and generally nonsignificant or inconsistent.References
Bendtsen, B. A., and J. Senft. 1986. Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci.18(1):23-28.nBeaudoin, M., R. E. Hernández, A. Koubaa, and J. Poliquin. 1992. Interclonal, intraclonal, and within-tree variation in wood density of poplar hybrid clones. Wood Fiber Sci.24(2): 147-153.nBlankenhorn, P. R., T. W. Bowersox, C. H. Strauss, G. L. Stimely, L. R. Stover, and M. L. DiCola. 1988. Effects of management strategy and site on selected properties of first rotation Populus hybrid NE-388. Wood Fiber Sci.20(1):74-81.nBoyce, S. G., and M. Kaiser. 1961. Environmental and genetic variability in the length of fibers of eastern cottonwood. Tappi44:363-366.nCurro, P. 1960. Technological investigations on the wood of some Euro-American poplar hybrids—Physical and mechanical properties. Agr. For. Exp. Center 3, Italy (as cited in Zobel and van Buijtenen 1989).nDeBell, D. S., and C. A. Harrington. 1997. Productivity of Populus in monoclonal and polyclonal blocks at three spacings. Can. J. For. Res.27:978-985.nDeBell, J. D., B. L. Gartner, and D. S. DeBell. 1998. Fiber length in young hybrid Populus stems grown at extremely different rates. Can. J. For. Res.28:603-608.nEaton, J. 2000. Poplar silviculture: Applying the European model to American poplar farming. Page 52 in J. G. Isebrands and J. Richardson, comps. 21st Session of the International Poplar Commission (1PC 2000) Poplar and Willow Culture: Meeting the Needs of Society and the Environment. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-215. NC Res. Sta.nEinspahr, D. W., M. K. Benson, and M. L. Harder. 1972. Influence of irrigation and fertilization on growth and wood properties of quaking aspen. Pages I-1 to I-11 in Proc. Symposium on the Effect of Growth Acceleration on Properties of Wood. 10-11 Nov 1971, Madison, WI. USDA For. Serv. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nFarmer, R. E., and J. R. Wilcox. 1966. Specific gravity variation in a lower Mississippi Valley cottonwood plantation. Tappi49:210-211.nForest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. Reprinted by Forest Products Society.nHaygreen, J. G., and J. L. Bowyer. 1996. Forest products and wood science—An introduction, 3rd ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. 484 pp.nHeilman, P. E., and R. F. Stettler. 1985. Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. II. Biomass productivity in a 4-year plantation. Can. J. For. Res.15:855-859.nHernández, R. E., A. Koubaa, M. Beaudoin, and Y. Fortin. 1998. Selected mechanical properties of fast-growing Poplar hybrid clones. Wood Fiber Sci.30(2):138-147.nJozsa, L. A. 1995. An overview of forest pruning and wood quality in British Columbia. Pages 36-64 in D. P. Hanley et al., eds. Forest pruning and wood quality. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nKeller, R. 1979. Premiers résultats d'une expérience d'élagage du peuplier 1 214. (Preliminary results of an experiment pruning poplar 1 214). Ann. Sci. Forest.36(1):59-92. (In French. English Summary).nKoubaa, A., R. E. Hernández, M. Beaudoin, and J. Poliquin. 1998. Interclonal, intraclonal, and within-tree variation in fiber length of poplar hybrid clones. Wood Fiber Sci.30(1):40-47.nKuhn, G. A., and J. Nuss. 2000. Watershed management using hybrid poplar. Agroforestry Notes, National Agroforestry Center, AF Note-17. USDA For. Serv. and USDA Nat. Res. Conserv. Serv., Lincoln, NE.nMatyas, C., and I. Peszlen. 1997. Effect of age on selected wood quality traits of poplar clones. Silvae Genetica46(2-3):64-72.nMegraw, R. A. 1985. Wood quality factors in loblolly pine. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA. 89 pp.nMegraw, R. A. 1986. Effect of silvicultural practices on wood quality. Pages 27-34 in TAPPI Res. Dev. Conf., Raleigh. NC.nPanshen, A. J., and C. deZeeuw. 1980. Textbook of wood technology, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, NY. 722 pp.nPeszlen, I. 1998. Variation in specific gravity and mechanical properties of poplar clones. Drevársky Výskum43(2):1-17.nPolge, H. 1969. (Density of planting and pruning of live branches, or why, when, and how to prune.) RFF 21 Special "Silviculture" 31: 451-462 (as cited in Zobel and van Buijtenen 1989).nPolge, H. 1985. Influence de l'élagage sur la duraminisation, la production de bois de tension et quelques autres propriétés du bois de peuplier I 214. (Effect of pruning on heartwood formation, production of tension wood and some other wood properties of Populus I-214. Ann. Sci. Forest.42(3):283-296. (In French, English Summary).nRasband, W. 1996. NIH image. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD. (Software).nSchonau, A. P. 1973. The effect of planting espacement and pruning on growth, yield, and timber density of Eucalyptus grandis. J. S. Afr. For.88:16-23.nSemen, E., M. Kuo, Y.-C. Su, R. B. Hall, and D. D. Stokke. 2001. Physical properties of kraft pulp from four-year-old aspen hybrids and crosses. Wood Fiber Sci.33(1):140-147.nVarem-Sanders, T. M. L., and I. D. Campbell. 1996. Dendro-Scan: A tree-ring width and density measuring system. Natural Resources Canada, Can. For. Serv., North. For. Cent., Edmonton, Alberta. (Software).nYanchuck, A. D., B. P. Dancik, and M. M. Micko. 1983. Intraclonal variation in wood density of trembling aspen in Alberta. Wood Fiber Sci.15:387-394.nYanchuck, A. D., B. P. Dancik, and M. M. Micko. 1984. Variation and heritability of wood density and fibre length of trembling aspen in Alberta, Canada. Silvae Genetica33(1):11-16.nZobel, B. J., and J. P. van Buijtenen. 1989. Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, New York. 363 pp.nZobel, B. J., and J. R. Sprague. 1998. Juvenile wood in forest trees. Springer-Verlag, New York. 300 pp.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
