Ultimate Tensile Stress and Modulus of Elasticity of Fast-Grown Plantation Loblolly Pine Lumber
Keywords:
Ultimate tensile stress, modulus of elasticity, juvenile wood, loblolly pine, plantationAbstract
The purpose of our study was to define the influence of juvenile wood on the tensile structural performance of dimension lumber from fast-grown plantation pine wood. Ultimate tensile stress and modulus of elasticity were measured on nominal 2- by 4-in. (standard 38- by 89-mm) lumber from a 28-year-old fast-grown loblolly pine plantation in North Carolina. We compared four grades of lumber and two lumber lengths. Strength and stiffness decreased with increasing amounts of juvenile wood. Average ultimate tensile stress and stiffness values of pieces composed entirely of juvenile wood were from 45 to 63% of those pieces composed entirely of mature wood, depending on grade and property.
We used physical properties as grading criteria to conform our test material to 1988 National Design Specifications (NDS) allowable design values. For our test material, percentage of latewood, number of rings per inch (25.4 mm), specific gravity, and presence or absence of pith could not be used individually as successful criteria for assuring conformance to design values. We compared data on mechanical properties to 1988 NDS allowable design values and to In-Grade test values. The performance of the Select Structural lumber conformed closest to the NDS design values; in the three lower grades tested—No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3—about 20% of the lumber did not conform to the design values. Compared to In-Grade test values for southern pine, the 5th-percentile strength, average stiffness, and specific gravity values of our material fell below the In-Grade test values for all grades. For both the NDS and In-Grade comparisons, strength values of our material could be raised above the 5th-percentile cut-off level by removing a given proportion of juvenile material from the analysis.
The correlation between ultimate tensile stress and modulus of elasticity of test material was about equivalent to that of southern pine lumber reported in the literature. Apparently, fast-grown pine plantation lumber with high proportions of juvenile wood can be machine stress-rated using techniques normally applied to traditionally used southern pine lumber. However, there does appear to be a pattern of decreasing slope in the strength-stiffness relationship with increasing juvenile wood content.
The results reported here are not representative of the global population of southern pine lumber on the market. However, the significant differences between juvenile and mature wood indicate that as the industry moves to a faster grown, shorter rotation resource, grading rules and allowable design stress values will need to be modified to accommodate this changing resource.
References
ASTM. 1989. Standard methods of static tests of timbers in structural sizes. ASTM D-4761-88. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.nASTM. 1990a. Standard methods for establishing structural grades and related allowable properties for visually graded lumber. ASTM D-245-88. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.nASTM. 1990b. Standard methods for establishing clear wood strength values. ASTM D-2555-88. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.nASTM. 1991. Standard practice for establishing allowable properties for visually graded dimension lumber from In-Grade tests of full size specimens. ASTM D-1990-91. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.nBarrett, J. D., and R. M. Kellogg. 1984. Strength and stiffness of second-growth Douglas-fir dimension lumber. Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, B.C.nBendtsen, B. A., and J. Senft. 1986. Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(1):23-38.nBendtsen, B. A., P. L. Plantinga, and T. A. Snellgrove. 1988. The influence of juvenile wood on the mechanical properties of 2 by 4's cut from Douglas-fir plantations. Proceedings, 1988 International Conference on Timber Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.nBier, H., and M. J. Collins. 1984. Bending properties of 100 x 50 mm structural timber from a 28-year-old stand of New Zealand Radiata pine. New Zealand FS reprint 1774. Presented to IUFRO Group S5.02, Xalapa, Mexico, December 1984.nBoone, R. S., and M. Chudnoff. 1972. Compression wood formation and other characteristics of plantation-growth Pinus caribaea. Res. Pap. ITF-13. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Inst. Trop. Forestry, Puerto Rico.nClark A., III, and J. R. Saucier. 1989. Influence of initial planting density, geographic location, and species on juvenile wood formation in southern pine. Forest Prod. J. 39(7/8):42-48.nDoyle, D. V., and L. J. Markwardt. 1967. Tension parallel-to-grain properties of southern pine dimension lumber. Res. Pap. FPL 84. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nGerhards, C. C. 1979. Effect of high-temperature drying on ultimate tensile stress of Douglas-fir 2 by 4's. Forest Prod. J. 29(3):39-46.nGreen, D. W., and J. W. Evans. 1987. Mechanical properties of visually graded lumber, vol. 1, Summary. National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, VA.nGreen, D. W., and J. W. Evans. 1989. Specific gravity of visually graded lumber. National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, VA.nGreen, D. W., and D. E. Kretschmann. 1991. Lumber property relationship for engineering design standards. Wood Fiber Sci. (in press).nHallock, H. 1968. Observations on forms of juvenile core in loblolly pine. Res. Note FPL-0188. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nKoch, P. 1966. Straight studs from southern pine veneer cores. Res. Pap. SO 25. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, LA.nMacPeak, M. D., L. F. Burkart, and D. Weldon. 1990. Comparison of grades, yields, and mechanical properties of lumber produced from young, fast-grown and old, slow-grown plantation slash pine. Forest Prod. J. 40(1):11-14.nMoody, R. C. 1970. Ultimate tensile stress of finger-joints in pith-associated and nonpith-associated southern pine lumber. Res. Pap. FPL 138. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nNational Lumber Grades Authority. 1980. NLGA standard grading rules for Canadian lumber. Vancouver, B.C.nNFPA. 1988. Design values for wood construction. Supplement to the 1986 edition of the National Design Specification for Wood Construction. National Forest Products Association, Washington, DC.nPearson, R. G. 1984. Characteristics of structural importance of clear wood and lumber from fast-grown loblolly pine stands. In Symposium on Utilization of the Changing Wood Resource in the Southern United States, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, June 12-13, 1984.nPearson, R. G., and R. C. Gilmore. 1971. Characterization of the strength of juvenile wood of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Forest Prod. J. 21(1):23-30.nPrice, E. W., and P. Koch. 1980. Kiln time and temperature affect shrinkage, warp, and mechanical properties of southern pine lumber. Forest Prod. J. 30(8):41-47.nSAS Institute. 1988. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) user's guide. Statistical Analysis System, Raleigh, NC.nSimpson, W. T., J. D. Danielson, and R. S. Boone. 1988. Press-drying plantation-grown loblolly pine 2 by 4's to reduce warp. Forest Prod. J. 38(11/12):41-48.nSPIB. 1977. Grading rules. Southern Pine Inspection Bureau, Pensacola, FL.nTang, Y., and W. T. Simpson. 1989. Bending strength of press-dried plantation loblolly pine. Forest Prod. J. 39(11/12):57-61.nWalford, G. B. 1982. Current knowledge of the In-Grade bending strength of New Zealand Radiata pine. FRI Bull. 15. Rotorua, New Zealand.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
