Fiber Length Measurement Systems: A Review and Modification of an Existing Method
Keywords:Fiber length, measurement, classification, optical methods, projection systems, continuous monitoring, automation, digitizing
AbstractThis paper describes various methods of fiber length measurement used in fundamental studies of wood properties as well as those used in the more applied area of pulp quality control. Methods described include direct measurement of cells from microscopic images (from either tangential longitudinal sections or macerated tissue), through measurement of projected images, to fiber classification using classical mechanical fractionation techniques through to the most recent optical and laser scanning methods. A semi-automatic measurement system using a 35-mm slide projector and measuring wheel linked to a data processor designed for use in the Forest Products Laboratory of the University of California is described.
Bailey, I. W. 1920. The cambium and its derivative tissues, II. Size variations of cambial initials in gymnosperms and angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 7:355-367.nBergman, G. K., and A. Backman. 1929. Cellulose fiber length. Papier-Fabr. 27(29):449-456.nBergman, S. I. 1949. Lengths of hardwood fibers and vessel segments. TAPPI 32(11):494-498.nBerlyn, G. P., and J. P. Miksche. 1976. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.nBrecht, W., and H. Mory. 1934, 1935. Beitrag zur kenntnis der faserlangenmessverfahren. Zellstoff u. Papier 14(12):492-495; 15(4):150-153; 15(6):237-238.nBurkart, L. F. 1966. New technique for maceration of woody tissue. For. Prod. J. 16(7):52.nBurkart, L. F. 1977. Simple, accurate method for measuring woody cell lengths. Wood Sci. 9(2):78-79.nBurley, J., T. Posner, and P. Waters. 1970. Sampling techniques for measurement of fibre length in Eucalyptus species. Wood Sci. Technol. 4:240-245.nClark, J. D'A. 1961. Convenient projector for fibre measurements. TAPPI 44(1):64.nCook, J. 1983. New fiber analyzer opens door for U.S. manufacturers. Southern Pulp Paper 46(8): 16-19.nCrosby, C. M., A. R. K. Eusufzai, R. E. Mark, R. W. Perkins, J. S. Chang, and N. V. Uplekar. 1981. A digitizing system for quantitative measurement of structural parameters in paper. TAPPI 64(3): 103-106.nDesch, H. E. 1932. Anatomical variation in dicotyledonous trees. New Phytol. 31:73-118.nDion, J. L., A. Malutta, and P. Cielo. 1982. Ultrasonic inspection of fiber suspensions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72(5):1524-1526.nEchols, R. M. 1959. The ampliscope-An instrument for wood-fiber measurements. J. For. 57(1):43-44.nEriksson, L., and J. Hill. 1973. Characterization of pulp by a new laser method and its application in the pulping process. CPPA/ISA International Symposium Pulp Paper Process Control (Montreal) 2:69-78.nFukazawa, F., and J. Ohtani. 1982. Within-a-tree variation of wood element size in Tilia japonica. IAWA Bull. 3(3-4):201-206.nFyfe, T. 1951. An optical projection method for measuring fiber length. For. Prod. J. 34(7):306-310.nGraff, J. H., and R. W. Miller. 1939. Fiber dimensions. Paper Trade J. 109(6):31-37.nHarris, J. M. 1966. A method of minimising observer bias in measuring tracheids. J. Roy. Microscop. Soc. 86(1):81-83.nHart, C. A., and B. F. Swindel. 1967. Notes on the laboratory sampling of macerated wood fibers. TAPPI 50(7):379-381.nHertel, K. L. 1940. Fibre-length analysis by the fibrograph. Text. Res. J. 10:510-520.nHill, J. 1981. SCS pulp quality monitor. Key to control of mechanical pulping. Swedish Pulp Paper Mission N. Am.: 495-515.nHill, J., and L. Eriksson. 1976. Optical analysis of fibre suspensions. Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 77(4):61-68.nHill, J., T. Pettersson, and S. Rydefalk. 1977. The STFI long-fiber content meter in process control applications. Svensk Papperstidn. 80(18):579-586.nHiller, C. H., D. W. Lewis, and E. M. Wengert. 1971. Semi-automated recording of wood cell dimensions. TAPPI 54(2):255-256.nIlvessalo-Pfáffeli, M.-S. 1956. Kuitupituuden määrityksestä (On the determination of fiber length). Paperi ja Puu 38(9):443-449.nIlvessalo-Pfáffeli, M.-S., and G. v. Althan. 1957. The measurement of fiber length with a semi-automatic recorder. Paperi ja Puu. 39(11):509-516.nJagels, R., D. J. Gardner, and T. B. Brann. 1982. Improved techniques for handling and staining wood fibers for digitizer assisted measurement. Wood Sci. 14(4):165-167.nKarnis, A., R. B. Kerr, and O. L. Forgacs. 1972. Mechanical pulp mill control systems I. The measurement of fibre length. Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 73(12):64-69.nLadell, J. L. 1959. A new method of measuring tracheid length. Forestry 32(2):124-125.nMcMillin, C. W. 1982. Application of automatic image analysis to wood science. Wood Sci. 14(3):97-105.nOhrn, O. E. 1969. A fibre length measuring gauge with an "easy to use" measuring probe. Svensk Papperstidn. 72(20):667-668.nQuirk, J. T. 1981. Semiautomated recording of wood cell dimensions. For. Sci. 27:336-338.nRandel, W. R., and J. E. Winsted. 1976. Environmental influence on cell and wood characters of Liquidamber styraciflua L. Bot. Gaz. 137(1):45-51.nSchulze, B. 1931. Contribution to the method of fiber measuring. Papier-Fabr. 29(1):4-5.nSugden, E. A. N. 1968. A semi-automated method for the determination of average fibre length by projection. Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 69(22):71-76.nTallant, J. D. 1951. Use of a servo system for automatic operation of the fibrograph. Text. Res. J. 22(9):617-619.nTAPPI. 1968. Fiber length of pulp by projection. Suggested method T232 su-68.nTAPPI. 1975. Fiber length of pulp by classification. Official Standard T233 os-75.nTaylor, F. W. 1975. Fiber length measurement-An accurate inexpensive technique. TAPPI 58(12):126-127.nValley, R. B., and T. H. Morse. 1965. Measurement of fiber length using a modified Coulter Particle Counter. TAPPI 48(6):372-376.nWilson, J. W. 1954. Fibre technology. I. Fibre length mensuration: A comprehensive history and new method. Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 55(5):84-91.nWinstead, J. E. 1978. Tracheid length as an ecotypic character in Acer negundo L. Amer. J. Bot. 65(7):811-812.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.