Improving Structural Lumber Quality in a Sample of <i>Picea Mariana</i> Logs Sawn According to the Knots
Keywords:
Sawing, modeling, knots, lumber, quality, simulationAbstract
This paper examines the effect of knots on the strength recovery of black spruce lumber. A model was developed and used to simulate sawing and grading of boards from knotty logs. Since a log internal defect scanner was unavailable, the internal knot morphology was modeled from external measurements. A standard cant and flitch sawing pattern was used in the simulations and rotated about the log axis. for each 30° of log rotation, the theoretical lumber grades were obtained based on knot sizes and positions within the boards. A best and worst sawing rotation angle based on the potential lumber grade yield was retained for each of 54 logs simulated Half of the logs were sawn into 2 X 4 nominal lumber according to the best rotation angle and the other half according to the worst rotation angle. The resulting pieces of lumber were first visually graded according to the knots and then according to all defects, followed by dynamic MOE testing and finally tested to destruction using a third-point standard bending procedure. The results demonstrate that there was little difference in visual grades between the "best" and "worst" groups and that knots played a minimal role in grade determination of the boards. However, there was significant difference in terms of MOE values, where the group of "best" boards showed an overall 15% increase over the "worst" boards. This result significantly impacts the potential MSR yield of the sample pieces of lumber. Bending tests showed a lurther 25% difference in average MOR between the two groups. These results suggest that there is potential for black spruce to yield higher strength lumber when knots are considered during breakdown. Further refinements should include a model that determines quality in terms of knot position within the board section rather than one that determines quality in terms of potential visual grades.References
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 1993. Standard D245-92. Standard practice for establishing structural grades and related allowable properties for visually graded lumber. Philadelphia, PA. 18 pp.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 1997. Standard D198-97. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes. Philadelphia, PA. 19 pp.nBarbour, J., E. Lowell, C. L. Todoroki D. L. Parry, and G. A. Christensen. 1999. Simulating North American lumber grade recovery with Autosaw using externally visible branch and stem form characteristics. Proc. IUFRO WP S5.01-04 Third Workshop Connection between Silviculture and Wood Quality through Modelling Approaches and Simulation Software. France. 645 pp.nBhandarkar, S. M., T. D. Faust, and M. Tang. 1999. CATALOG: A system for detection and rendering of internal log defects using computer tomography. Machine Vision and Applications 11:171-190.nBindzi, I., M. Samson, and L.-M. Kamoso. 1996. Geometric modeling of a sawlog. Annales des sciences forestières 53:21-30. (In French)nChang, S. J., and S. Guddanti. 1995. TOPSAW-HW: A training and optimisation system for sawing hardwood logs. Paper presented at the XX IUFRO World Congress, August 6-12, Tampere, Finland.nChiorescu, S., and A. Grönlund. 2000. Validation of a CT-based simulator against a sawmill yield. Forest Prod. J. 50(6):69-76.nGrondin, F., and N. Drouin. 1998. OPTITEK Sawmill Simulator—User's Guide. Forintek Canada Corporation, Québec, Canada.nJäppinen, A., and M. Nylinder. 1997. Automatic sorting of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) sawlogs by grade. Holz Roh- Werkst. 55:301-305.nLeban, J.-M., R. Daquitaine, and L. St-André. 1996. WinEpifn: A software for wood quality evaluation for a Douglas-fir resource. Forêt-entreprise (109): 11-15.nLemieux, H., M. Samson, and A. Usenius. 1997. Shape and distribution of knots in a sample of Picea abies logs. Scand. J. Forest Res. 12:50-56.nLemieux, H., M. Beaudoin, and F. Grondin. 2000. A model for the sawing and grading of lumber according to knots. Wood Fiber Sci. 32(2):179-188.nLemieux, H., M. Beaudoin, and S. Y. Zhang. 2001. Characterization and modeling of knots in black spruce (Picea mariana) logs. Submitted to Wood Fiber Sci.nNational Lumber Grades Authority. 1996. Standard grading rules for Canadian lumber. Burnaby, BC.nOccena, L. G., and D. L. Schmoldt. 1994. Computer-generated optimum hardwood log sawing using internal defect information. Proc. 1994 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, January 5-7, Cambridge, MA.nSamson, M. 1993. Method for assessing the effect of knots in the conversion of logs in tree trunks. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(2):298-304.nSamson, M., I. Bindzi, and L.-M. Kamoso. 1996. Mathematical representation of knots in tree trunks. Canadian J. Forest Res. 26(2):159-165 (In French).nShalaev, V. S. 1983. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sawing spruce sawlogs oriented according to the knots. Lesnoi Zhunal (4):70-73 (in Russian).nSteele, P. H., T. E. G. Harless, F. G. Wagner, L. Kumar, and F. W. Taylor. 1994. Increased lumber value from optimum orientation of internal defects with respect to sawing pattern in hardwood sawlogs. Forest Prod. J. 44(3):69-72.nTodoroki, C. 1996. Developments of the sawing simulation software, AUTOSAW linking wood properties, sawing, and lumber end-use. IUFRO S5.01-04 Second Workshop—Connection between Silviculture and Wood Quality through Modelling Approaches and Simulation Softwares. August 26-31. South Africa. 456 pp.nWagner, F. G., F. W. Taylor, D. S. Ladd, C. W. Mcmillin, and F. L. Roder. 1989. Ultrafast CT scanning of an oak log for internal defects. Forest Prod. J. 39(11/12):62-64.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
