The Effects of Chromated Copper Arsenate and Ammoniacal Copper Zinc Arsenate on Shear Strength Development of Phenolic Resin to Sitka Spruce Bonds
Keywords:
Wood-based composites, preservative pretreatment, hot-pressing, bond-strength development, chromated copper arsenate, ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate, phenol-formaldehydeAbstract
Preservative treatment of whole, wood-based composite products (mainly panels) has disadvantages; problems largely stem from swelling, strength loss, and incomplete or inappropriate penetration during treatment, and distortion during redrying. Pretreatment of comminuted wood prior to mat lay-up is one alternative, though the addition of chemicals may affect bonding during subsequent pressing. With this possibility in mind, the strength accumulation of small test bonds (15 x 4 mm) between variously treated thin wood pieces was investigated. Pieces of Sitka spruce (sliced 0.8 x 15 x 150 mm) were treated with one of four concentrations (0.25 to 1.50% oxide basis) of either chromated copper arsenate or ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate. An automated device was used to form and test lap-shear specimens from matched pairs of variously treated wood and a phenol-formaldehyde adhesive. Each specimen was pulled immediately after pressing to measure the accumulated shear strength of the bond. Pressing times ranged from 10 to 300 sec at 95 C and 1.5 MPa, and this enabled near-isothermal strength-development plots to be constructed for each level of pretreatment. The plots suggested that preservative pretreatment did not significantly affect shear strength development rates at the chemical retention levels and pressing and testing conditions employed.References
American Wood-preservers' Association. 1992. Book of standards. Stevensville, MD.nBoggio, K., and R. Gertjejansen. 1982. Influence of ACA and CCA waterborne preservatives on the properties of aspen waferboard. Forest Prod. J. 32(3):22-26.nBolton, A. J., P. E. Humphrey, and P. K. Kavvouras. 1989. The hot pressing of dry-formed wood-based composites. Part VI. The importance of stresses in the pressed mattress and their relevance to the minimisation of pressing time, and the variability of board properties. Holzforschung 43:406-110.nBryant, B. S. 1968. Interaction of wood surfaces and adhesive variables. Forest Prod. J. 18(6):57-62.nChoong, E. T., and A. Attarzedah. 1970. Gluability of non-pressure treated southern pine veneer. Louisiana State University Wood Utilization Notes. Agric. Exp. Sta. Release 18. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.nHumphrey, P. E. 1993. A device to test adhesive bonds. U.S. patent number 5,176,028. U.S. Patent Office, Washington, DC.nHumphrey, P. E., and A. J. Bolton 1989. The hot pressing of dry-formed wood-based composites. Part II. A simulation model for heat and moisture transfer, and typical results. Holzforschung 43:199-206.nHumphrey, P. E., and S. Ren. 1989. Bonding kinetics of ther-mosetting adhesive systems used in wood-based composites: The combined effect of temperature and moisture content. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 3:397-413.nHumphrey, P. E., and D. Zavala. 1989. A technique to evaluate the bonding reactivity of thermosetting adhesives. J. Testing Eval. 17:323-328.nHutchinson, C. I., S. L. Choong, and J. M. Mc-Laughling. 1977. Bonding of radiata pine veneers treated with CCA preservatives by the momentary immersion methods. N. Z. J. Forest Sci. 7(1):113-122.nKreber, B., P. E. Humphrey, and J. J. Morrell. 1993. Effect of polyborate pre-treatment on the shear strength development of phenolic resin to Sitka spruce bonds. Holzforschung 47:398-402.nPizzi, A. 1983. Phenolic resins. Pages 105-176 in A. Pizzi, ed. Wood adhesives: Chemistry and technology. Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.nSuchsland, O. 1962. The density distribution in flake-boards. Quart. Michigan Bull. Agric. Exp. Sta. 45(1):104-121.nThompson, W. S. 1962. Effect of preservative salts on the gluing of sweetgum veneer. Forest Prod. J. 12(9):431-436.nVick, C. B., R. C. DeGroot, and J. Youngquist. 1990. Compatibility of nonacidic waterborne preservatives with phenol-formaldehyde adhesive. Forest Prod. J. 40(2):16-22.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.