Factors Influencing The Movement of Chloropicrin Vapor In Wood To Control Decay

Authors

  • P. A. Cooper
  • R. D. Graham
  • R. T. Lin

Keywords:

Chloropicrin, Poria monticola, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Thuja plicata, diffusion, air permeability, fungal toxicity, sterilants, <i>in situ</i> treatments

Abstract

Some of the factors affecting the movement of chloropicrin vapor in wood to control decay were studied in a series of four experiments. Chloropicrin moved much faster in permeable Douglas-fir heartwood than in wood of low permeability, partly because of more extensive liquid movement in the permeable woods. The lethal dosage of chloropicrin to the wood decay fungus Poria monticola was from 20 to 100 mg-h/liter for the conditions evaluated. Chloropicrin movement in a decaying Douglas-fir pole section was variable and was facilitated by the decayed area. Most areas in the pole received a high dosage of vapor, more than sufficient to kill decay fungi. Vapor could still be detected at most of the sampling sites six months after treatment. The release of chloropicrin vapor in wood could be controlled by dissolving paradichlorobenzene in the chemical to lower its vapor pressure and by confining chloropicrin in polymer slow-release capsules. These approaches increased the duration of the vapor in wood.

References

Barker, R. M. 1941. Diffusion in and through solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.nCooper, P. A. 1973. The movement of chloropicrin vapor in wood to control decay. M.Sc. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 75 pp.nEslyn, W. E. 1970. Utility pole decay. Part II. Basidiomycetes associated with decay in wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 4(2):97-103.nGraham, R. D. 1964. Sink-float test to determine treatability of Douglas-fir. For. Prod. J. 14(11):516.nGraham, R. D. 1973. Fumigants can stop internal decay of wood products. For. Prod. J. 23(2):35-38.nGraham, R. D., and J. S. Mothershead. 1967. Inspecting and treating western red cedar and Douglas-fir poles in service. For. Res. Lab., Oregon State University, Corvallis, Inf. Circ. 21. 34 pp.nHand, O. F., P. A. Lindgren, and A. F. Wetsch. 1970. The control of fungal decay and insects in transmission poles by gas phase treatment. Branch Lab. Bonneville Power Adm., Vancouver, Wash. 28 pp.nHarris, E. C. 1963. Methyl bromide fumigation and wood boring insects. Proc. Annu. Conv. Brit. Wood Preserv. Assoc., London: 159-175.nKofoid, C. A., ed. 1934. Termites and termite control. University California Press, Berkeley. 734 pp.nMiller, D. J. 1961. Permeability of Douglas-fir in Oregon. For. Prod. J. 11(1):14-16.nResch, H., and B. A. Ecklund. 1964. Permeability of wood … exemplified by measurements on redwood. For. Prod. J. 14 (5):199-207.nRicard, J. L., T. E. See, and W. B. Bollen. 1968. Control of incipient decay with gases in Douglas-fir poles. For. Prod. J. 18(4):45-51.nRogers, C. E. 1964. The solution, diffusion, and permeation of gases and vapors in high polymers. In D. Fox, M. Labes, and A. Wetsenberg, eds. Physics and chemistry of the organic solid state. Interscience, New York.nScheffer, T. C., and R. D. Graham. 1972. Paradichlorobenzene for temporary protection of wood against fungi. For. Prod. J. 22(8):40-41.nTamblyn, N., and F. A. Dale. 1963. Current and future preservation research as applied to poles. Aust. CSIRO, Div. For. Prod., Melbourne, Rep. 540. 7 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions