Temperature and Moisture Influence on Compression-Recovery Behavior of Wood

Authors

  • Michael P. Wolcott
  • Eugene L. Shutler

Keywords:

Compression, recovery, springback, glass-transition temperature, pressing

Abstract

The primary limitation of non-veneer wood composites for applications in moist environments is dimensional instability. Thickness instabilities from moisture absorption primarily result from damaged cell structures that recover upon absorption of moisture. Previous research has shown that manipulating the pressing parameters involved in the manufacture of non-veneer wood composites (i.e., temperature and moisture) can lead to a more dimensionally stable product. However, the precise phenomena controlling these changes are not fully defined. To understand development of pressing-induced damage, the large strain, compression-recovery behavior of wood and polyurethane (PUR) foam (i.e., as a model system) was studied at a variety of compression temperatures spanning the glassy to rubber transition. The behavior is then related to polymer phase transitions to discern the role of viscoelastic behavior in damage evolution. The elastic modulus (E) and yield stress (σy) were used to characterize the elastic region of compression, whereas fractional recovery (R) and dissipated energy (ΔE) represented the inelastic component. The PUR foam displayed a distinct glassy plateau region dominated by E, σy, and ΔE as well as low R. Wood with 22 and 12% MC behaved similarly to the elastomeric PUR foam; however, limits on environmental control prevented testing in the rubbery regime for the 12% MC samples. The E and σy also decreased with increasing compression temperature for ovendried yellow-poplar. However, in contrast to yellow-poplar with either 12 or 22% MC, an increase in ΔE was accompanied by a decrease in R with increasing compression temperature of the oven-dried yellow-poplar. An apparent change in mechanism occurs when compressing wood at high temperatures without moisture present. This change was attributed to kinetic effects such as thermal degradation or crosslinking reactions.

References

Biermann, C. J., T. P. Schultz, and G. D. McGinnis. 1984. Rapid steam hydrolysis/extraction of mixed hardwoods as a biomass pretreatment. J. Wood Chem. Technol.4(1):111-128.nBillmeyer, F. W. 1971. Textbook of polymer science, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.nCasey, L. J. 1987. Changes in wood flake properties in relation to heat, moisture and pressure during flakeboard manufacture. Master's Thesis, Virginia Poly. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.nEasterling, K. E., R. Harrysson, L. J. Gibson, and M. F. Ashby. 1982. On the mechanics of balsa and other woods. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A383:31-41.nGardner, D. J., D. W. Gunnells, M. P. Wolcott, and L. Amos. 1992. Changes in wood polymers during the pressing of wood-composites. Proc. Cellulose '91. December 2-6, 1991. New Orleans, LA. Ellis Horwood Co., West Sussex, England. Ed. P. A. Williams.nHiggins, H. G. 1946. A critical temperature range in the plastic deformation of plywood. Journal C.S.I.R.19(4): 45-62.nHiggins, H. G. 1953. Factors influencing the plastic deformation of timber and plywood in compression. Austr. J. Appl. Sci.4:1:84-97.nKasal, B. 1989. Behavior of wood under transverse compression. Master's Thesis, Virginia Poly. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.nKelley, S. S., T. G. Rials, and W. G. Glasser. 1987. Relaxation behavior of the amorphous components of wood. J. Mater. Sci.29:617-624.nKoch, C. B. 1964. The recovery of wood after subjection to high compressive strains perpendicular to the grain. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.nKunesh, R. H. 1961. The inelastic behavior of wood: A new concept for improved panel forming processes. Forest Prod. J.9:395-405.nLora, J. H., and M. Wayman. 1978. Delignification of hardwoods by autohydrolysis and extraction. Tappi61(6):47-50.nMeinecke, E. A., and R. C. Clark. 1973. Mechanical properties of polymeric foams. Technomic, Westport, CT.nOstberg, G., L. Salmen, and J. Terlecki. 1990. Softening temperature of moist wood measured by differential scanning calorimetry. Holzforschung44:3:223-225.nPlagemann, W. L., E. W. Prince, and W. E. Johns. 1984. The response of hardwood flakes and flakeboard to high temperature drying. J. Adhesion16:311-338.nRosa, M. E., and M. A. Fortes. 1988a. Stress relaxation and creep of cork. J. Mater. Sci.23:35-42.nRosa, M. E., and M. A. Fortes. 1988b. Plate effects on the compression and recovery of dimensions of cork. J. Mater. Sci.23:879-885.nSalmen, L. 1984. Viscoelastic properties of in situ lignin under water-saturated conditions. J. Mater. Sci.19: 3090-3096.nShen, Y., F. Golnaraghi, and A. Plumtree. 2001. Modelling compressive cyclic stress—strain behaviour of structural foam. Int. J. Fatigue23:491-497.nSchultz, T. P., C. J. Biermann, and G. D. McGinnis. 1983. Steam explosion of mixed hardwood chips as a biomass pretreatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev.22(2):344-348.nSeborg, R. M., and A. J. Stamm. 1941. The compression of wood. USDA Forest Prod. Lab. Report No. R1258.nWolcott, M. P., F. A. Kamke, and D. A. Dillard. 1995. Fundamental aspects of wood deformation pertaining to manufacture of wood-based composites. Wood Fiber Sci.24(4):496-511.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions