Fungi Associated with Decay in Treated Southern Pine Utility Poles in the Eastern United States
Keywords:Decay, soft rot, southern pine, utility poles, creosote, pentachlorophenol, decay patterns, Basidiomycetes, microfungi
AbstractApproximately 1,320 fungi were isolated and studied from 246 creosote- or pentachlorophenol-treated southern pine poles in service in the eastern United States. The fungi identified were Basidiomycete decayers, soft rotters, and microfungi. White rot fungi predominated in the 262 Basidiomycete decayers isolated from 180 poles. The major Basidiomycetes isolated by radial position from poles of varying service ages appeared to develop initially in the outer treated zones and were often associated with seasoning checks. Some decay origins, however, appeared to be cases of preinvasion and escapes of preservative treatment. Five species of soft rot fungi comprised nearly 85% of 211 isolates obtained from 131 poles. They were isolated primarily from creosote-treated poles in outer treated zones at the groundline. Dissection analysis of 92 poles indicated that six developmental decay patterns and certain fungi were associated commonly with a pattern. The pole mycoflora isolated was relatively uniform in distribution in the eastern United States. The soft rotters and white rot group of Basidiomycete decayers appear to be a more important component of the treated southern pine pole mycoflora than has been recognized previously.
Bech-Andersen, J., and L. Harmesen [Harmsen]. 1980. Pole fungus A. Pages 78-82 in T. A. Oxley, G. Becker, and D. Allsopp, eds., Biodeterioration. Proc. Fourth Int. Biodeterior. Symp.; 1978 August-September. Berlin. London: Pitman Publ. Ltd. 375 pp.nCarranza, Julieta. 1979. Fungi associated with creosoted pine utility poles in New York. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Master's thesis. 83 pp.nCorbett, N. H. 1965. Micro-morphological studies on the degradation of lignified cell walls by Ascomycetes and Fungi Imperfecti. J. Inst. Wood Sci.14:18-29.nCowling, E. B. 1957. A partial list of fungi associated with decay of wood products in the United States. Plant Dis. Rep.41(10):894-896.nDavidson, R. W., W. A. Campbell, and D. J. Blaisdell. 1938. Differentiation of wood-decaying fungi by their reactions on gallic or tannic acid medium. J. Agric. Res.57:683-695.nDavidson, R. W., W. A. Campbell, and D. B. Vaughn. 1942. Fungi causing decay of living oaks in the eastern United States and their cultural identification. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. No. 785. 65 pp.nDuncan, C. G. 1960. Wood attacking capacities and physiology of soft rot fungi. U.S.D.A. For. Serv., For. Prod. Lab. Rep. No. 2173. 28 pp.nDuncan, C. G. 1961. Relative aeration requirements by soft rot and Basidiomycete wood-destroying fungi. U.S.D.A. For. Serv., For. Prod. Lab. Rep. No. 2218. 6 pp.nDuncan, C. G., and F. F. Lombard. 1965. Fungi associated with principal decays in wood products in the United States. U.S.D.A. For. Serv. Res. Paper WO-4. 31 pp.nEslyn, W. E. 1970. Utility pole decay II. Basidiomycetes associated with decay in poles. Wood Sci. Technol.4:97-103.nGraham, R. D., T. C. Scheffer, G. G. Helsing, and J. D. Lew. 1976. Fumigants can stop internal decay of Douglas-fir poles for at least 5 years. For. Prod. J.26(7):38-41.nHenningsson, B., T. Nilsson, P. Hoffmeyer, H. Friis-Hansen, L. Schmidt, and S. Jakobsen. 1976. Soft rot in utility poles salt treated in the years 1940-1954. Swedish Wood Pres. Inst. No. 117 E. 135 pp.nKerner-Gang, W. 1976. Effect of micro-organisms on creosote. Mat. und Holz Beiheft3:319-330.nLeightley, L. E. 1978. Soft rot fungi found in copper-chrome-arsenic treated hardwood power transmission poles in Queensland. Int. Res. Group on Wood Pres., DOC No. IRG/WP/185.nMarsden, D. H. 1954. Studies on the creosote fungus, Hormodendrum resinae.Mycologia46:161-183.nMorrell, J. J. 1981. Soft rot fungi: Their growth requisites and effects on wood. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Ph.D. Thesis. 161 pp.nNakasone, K. K., and W. E. Eslyn. 1981. A new species, Phlebia brevispora, a cause of internal decay in utility poles. Mycologia73:803-810.nNilsson, T. 1973. Studies on wood degradation and cellulolytic activity of microfungi. Studia Forestalia Sueica Nr. 104, Stockholm. 40 pp.nNilsson, T., and B. Henningsson. 1978. Phialophora species occurring in preservative treated wood in ground contact. Mat. und Org.13(4):298-313.nPolishook, J. D. 1982. The fungal flora of untreated and recently treated utility poles of southern yellow pine. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Master's Thesis. 54 pp.nShigo, A. L., W. C. Shortle, and J. Ochrymowych. 1977. Detection of active decay at groundline in utility poles. For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-35, For. Ser. U.S.D.A. 26 pp.nSmith, R. S., and G. W. Swenn. 1975. Colonization and degradation of western red cedar shingles and shakes by fungi. Org. und Holz3:253-262.nWilcox, W. W. 1964. Preparation of decayed wood for microscopical examination. U.S.D.A. For. Serv., For. Prod. Lab. Res. Note FPL-056. 22 pp.nWilcox, W. W. 1970. Anatomical changes in wood cell walls attacked by fungi and bacteria. Bot. Rev.36(1):1-28.nZabel, R. A., F. F. Lombard, and A. M. Kenderes. 1980. Fungi associated with decay in treated Douglas-fir transmission poles in the Northeastern United States. For. Prod. J.30(4):51-56.nZabel, R. A., C. J. K. Wang, and F. C. Terracina. 1982. The fungal associates, detection, and fumigant control of decay in treated southern pine poles. Electrical Power Research Institute, Project 1471-1, Final Report. 93 pp.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.