Environmental Performance Index for the Forest

Authors

  • Bruce Lippke
  • Jeffrey Comnick
  • Leonard R. Johnson

Keywords:

Biodiversity, forest management, intensive management, forest diversity, restoration, environmental performance

Abstract

Comparative environmental performance indices for energy use, global warming potential (GWP), air, water, and solid waste emissions covering the stages of processing from the harvesting of wood and the extraction of non-renewable materials to the construction of a house using different materials are developed in other articles. Developing performance indices that compare renewable resources and their environmental impacts on the land base to the depletion of non-renewable resources is problematic. Materials that involve mining are inherently not renewable compared to forest resources, which are renewable over some rotation age of the forest. The environmental impacts on the forest are dynamic and are impacted by landscape changes with some related to the production of wood for markets. Forest ecology metrics are developed to show the impact of management alternatives based on changing stand structures. Forest diversity, measured by structure classes, is impacted by longer rotation and thinning alternatives as well as preservation and protection policies.

Management alternatives can contribute to some restoration of pre-settlement conditions of forests and provides a benchmark from which to evaluate reduced stand structure diversity and loss of habitat. While a century of commercial management has reduced the diversity in the forest and in particular has increased the share of acres in both the stand initiation stage and the closed canopy or stem exclusion stage, the trend has already turned in response to demands for more forest acres under increased protection and preservation status. Increased thinning from more intensive management and policies to protect threatened species are both contributing to increased understory reinitiation and ultimately more complex old forest structures. Longer rotation management could add to this effect but at a substantial cost since the economics of long rotation management falls below acceptable levels for economic investments.

References

Carey, A., B. Lippke, and J. Sessions. 1999. Intentional ecosystem management: Managing forests for biodiversity. J. Sustain. For. 9(3):83-125.nChurchill, D. 2003. Fact Sheet 24: The emerging consensus for active management in young forests. Rural Technology Initiative, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.Ruraltech.org. (25 Feb 2005)nGarman, S. L., J. H. Cissel, and J. H. Mayo. 2003. Accelerating development of late-successional conditions in young managed Douglas-fir stands: A simulation study. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-557. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.nLippke, B. R., B. B. Bare, W. Xu, and M. Mendoza. 2002. An assessment of forest policy changes in Western Washington. J. Sustain. For. 14(4):63-94.nMcCarter, J., J. Wilson, P. Baker, J. Moffett, and C. Oliver. 1998. Landscape management through integration of existing tools and emerging technologies. J. For. 96(6):17-23.nMacLean, C. D., P. M. Bassett, and G. Yeary. 1992. Timber resource statistics for Western Washington. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Resource Bulletin PJNW-RB-191, Portland OR.nPerez-Garcia, J., B. Lippke, J. Comnick, and C. Manriquez. 2004. Tracking carbon from substitution in the forest to wood products and substitution. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module N. Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction: University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 27 pp.nPoage, N. J., and J. C. Tappeiner. 2002. Long-term patterns of diameter and basal area growth of old-growth Douglas-fir trees in western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 32(7): 1232-1243.nTappeiner, J. C., D. Huffman, D. Marshall, T. A. Spies, and J. D. Bailey. 1997. Density, ages, and growth rates in old-growth and young-growth forests in coastal Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 27(5):638-648.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Special Issue / December 2005

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.