The Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalization

Authors

  • Harold W. Wisdom

Keywords:

Employment, forest products, international trade, labor, lumber, Philippines, tariffs, trade, trade liberalization

Abstract

Despite an unprecedented reduction in trade barriers since World War II, some countries continue to impose sizable tariffs on forest products imports. The Vancouver Agreement of the APEC countries calls for the elimination of all tariffs on paper products by the year 2002 and on wood products by the year 2004. However, several APEC countries are strongly resisting tariff removals. Protected industries emphasize the potential job loss of trade liberalization, but liberalization also benefits consumers by lowering the cost of the good and offering a wider choice of goods. This paper presents an empirical model for comparing the benefits and costs of trade liberalization. The model is applied to the elimination of the Philippine tariff on lumber imports. The results of the analysis suggest that the welfare gains from removing the tariff substantially exceed the job displacement costs.

References

Anderson, K. 1992. The standard welfare economics of policies affecting trade and the environment. Pages 25-48 in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst, eds. The greening of world trade issues. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.nBraga, C. A. P. 1992. Tropical forests and trade policy: The case of Indonesia and Brazil. Pages 173-193 in International trade and the environment. World Bank Discussion Papers No. 159. Washington, DC.nFood And Agriculture Organization (FAO). 1998. FAOSTAT database. Available electronically at nForest Management Bureau. 1990. Master plan for forestry development in the Philippines. Final Report. Department of the Environment and Natural Resources. Government of the Philippines, Quezon City. 477 pp.nHufbauer, G. C., and K. A. Elliott. 1994. Measuring the costs of protection in the United States. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC. 125 pp.nKrugman, P. R., J. Alms, S. M. Collins, and E. M. Remolona. 1992. Transforming the Philippine economy. NEDA/UNDP. Manila. 77 pp.nLeamer, E. and R. M. Stern. 1970. Quantitative international economics. Aldine Publishing Co. Chicago, IL. 209 pp.nMagee, S. P. 1972. The welfare effects of restrictions on U.S. trade. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3:645-707.nMarkandya, A. and D. M. Pearce. 1991. Development, the environment, and the social rate of discount. The World Bank Research Observer 6(2):137-152.nMarkre, M. E., and D. G. Tarr. 1980. The effects of restrictions on United States imports: Five case studies and theory. Staff Report. Bureau of Economics. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC. 212 pp.nMoore, W. H. 1998. Statement by W. Hensen Moore. President & CEO American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA) before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Banking Hearings on Asian Financial Issues, February 3, 1998. Washington, DC. 3 pp.nNational Statistical Coordination Board. 1991. Philippine Statistical Yearbook, 1991. Government of the Philippines, Manila. 500 pp.nParis, R., and I. Ruzicka. 1991. Barking up the wrong tree: The role of rent appropriation in sustainable tropical forest management. Occasional Paper No. 1. Environmental Office. Asian Development Bank, Manila. 27 pp.nRamirez, D. M. and J. G. Laarman. 1993. Baseline data on forestry employment. Report No. 93-19. Louis Berger International, Inc. NRMR Manila. 74 pp.nRoussland, D. J., and J. W. Soumela. 1985. Calculating the consumer and net welfare costs of import relief. Staff Research Study No. 15. International Trade Commission, Washington DC. 97 pp.nSzenberg, M., J. W. Lombardi, and E. Y. Lee. 1977. Welfare effects of trade restrictions. Academic Press, New York, NY. 161 pp.nTarr, D. G., and M. E. Markre. 1984. Aggregate costs to the United States of tariffs and quotas on imports. Bureau of Economics. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC. 148 pp.nWisdom, H. W. 1994. A policy model for balancing forest products trade, environment and sustainable forest management. Report to USAID/Philippines, Manila. 64 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-25

Issue

Number 3 / July 1999

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.