The Effect of Wood Extractive Content on Glue Adhesion and Surface Wettability of Wood
Keywords:
Adhesion, extractives, glue, softwood, wettability, woodAbstract
The effect of wood extractive content on glue adhesion and surface wettability was evaluated. Specimens of pine heartwood (Pinus silvestris), stored at different times after surface planing, were assembled with a water-resistant polyvinyl acetate glue. The test material was classified according to its content of lipophilic extractives by chemical analyses. Glue adhesion parameters were assessed using two different test methods, a standard ASTM shear strength test and a nonstandard fracture test. Surface wettability was evaluated by contact angle measurements in parallel experiments. The results showed that, when the strength of the bonds was determined, the percentage adhesion failure increased with increasing extractive content for specimens exposed to water boiling test; but no such correlation was found in tests without water boiling. The correlation between glue bond strength and extractive content was poor. Surface storage time had no significant effect on the glue adhesion parameters. Surface wettability measurements revealed a complex relationship between extractive content and surface storage time.References
Ahola, P. 1995. Adhesion between paints and wooden substrates: Effects of pre-treatment and weathering. Materials and Structures28:350-356.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials. (ASTM D 905-94.) 1994. Standard test method for strength properties of adhesive bonds in shear by compression loading.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials. (ASTM D 3110-95) 1995. Standard specification for adhesives used in laminated joints for non-structural glued lumber products.nBack, E. L. 1991. Oxidative activation of wood surfaces for glue bonding. Forest Prod. J.41(2):30-36.nBoxall, J. 1984. Exterior wood finishes: Performance testing by accelerated natural weathering. JOCCA67: 40-44.nChen, C.-M. 1970. Effect of extractive removal on adhesion and wettability of some tropical woods. Forest Prod. J.20(1):36-41.nDavalos, J. F., P. Madabushi-Raman, and P. Oiao. 1996. Mode I fracture toughness of composite/wood interface bond. Mater. new millennium, Proc. Mater. Eng. Conf., 4th, vol. 2, pages 1469-1478, Ed: K.P. Chong, Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., New York, NY.nEbewele, R. O., B. H. River, and J. A. Koutsky. 1979. Tapered double cantilever beams fracture tests of phenolic-wood adhesive joints. Part I. Development of specimen geometry; effects of bondline thickness, wood anisotropy, and cure time on fracture energy. Wood Fiber11(3):197-213.nEbewele, R. O., B. H. River, and J. A. Koutsky. 1980. Tapered double cantilever beams fracture tests of phenolic-wood adhesive joints. Part II. Effects of surface roughness, the nature of surface roughness, and surface aging on joint fracture energy. Wood Fiber12(1):40-65.nEbewele, R. O., B. H. River, and J. A. Koutsky. 1986. Wood processing variables and adhesive joint performance. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.32(1):2979-2988.nEkman, R., and B. Holmbom. 1989. Analysis by gas chromatography of the wood extractives in pulp and water samples from mechanical pulping of spruce. Nordic Pulp Pap. Res. J.4(1):16-24.nEN 204. 1991. European standard. Classification of non-structural adhesives for joining of wood and derived timber products.nGagliano, J. M., and C. E. Frazier. 2000. Mode I fracture toughness testing of adhesively bonded wood. Wood adhesives 2000 extended abstracts pp. 81-83. For. Prod. Soc., Madison, WI.nGood, R. J. 1972. Theory of "cohesive" vs. "adhesive" separation in an adhering system. J. Adhesion4:133-154.nHedner, G. 1990. Mathematical equations in solid mechanics, 9th ed. Publ. no. 104. Dept. of Solid Mechanics, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.nHolloway, M. W., and P. A. Walker. 1964. A method for measurement of adhesion of surface coating under service condition. JOCCA47:812-823.nJohansson, I. 2000. Unpublished results, Swedish Institute for Wood Technology Research.nKleive, K. 1986. Weathering wood surfaces—Their influence on the durability of coating system. J. Coat. Techn.58(740):39-43.nKnaebe, M., and R. S. Williams. 1993. Determining paint adhesion to wood using a uniform double-cantilever beam technique. J. Testing Eval.21(4):272-279.nNussbaum, R. M. 1999. Natural surface inactivation of Scots pine and Norway spruce evaluated by contact angle measurements. Holz Roh- Werkst, 57(6):419-424.nOkkonen, E. A., and B. H. River. 1989. Factors affecting the strength of block-shear specimens. Forest Prod. J.39(1):43-50.nÖrså, F., and B. Holmbom. 1994. A convenient method for determination of wood extractives in papermaking process waters and effluents. J. Pulp Pap. Sci.20(12): J361-366.nRiver, B. H., C. T. Scott, and J. A. Koutsky. 1989. Adhesive joint fracture behaviour during setting and aging. Forest Prod. J.39(11-12):23-28.nRosenqvist, M., and M. Karlsson. 1999. Near infrared spectroscopy for analysis of pine wood extractives. Report 19908032 (in Swedish). Trätek, Stockholm, Sweden.nScott, C. T., B. H. River, and J. A. Koutsky. 1992. Fracture testing wood adhesives with composite cantilever beams. J. Testing Eval.20(4):259-264.nStanger, A. G., and R. F. Blomquist. 1965. Block shear cross-lap tension and glueline cleavage methods of testing glued joints. Forest Prod. J.15(12):468(sic!)-474.nStehr, M. 1999. Adhesion to machined and laser ablated wood surfaces. Ph.D. thesis, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.nStrickler M. D. 1968. Specimen designs for accelerated tests. Forest Prod. J.18(9):84-90.nStumbo, D. A. 1964. Influence of surface aging prior to gluing on bond strength of Douglas-fir and redwood. Forest Prod. J.14(12):582-589.nWålinder, M. 2000. Wetting phenomena on wood—Factors influencing measurements of wood wettability. Ph.D. thesis, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. Wood Technology and Processing.nWilliams, R. S., J. E. Winandy, and W. C. Feist. 1987. Adhesion of paint to weathered wood. Forest Prod. J.37(11-12):29-31.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.