Time Domain Ultrasonic Signal Characterization for Defects in Thin Unsurfaced Hardwood Lumber

Authors

  • Mohammed F. Kabir
  • Daniel L. Schmoldt
  • Mark E. Schafer

Keywords:

Ultrasonic scanning, transducer, time-of-flight, wood defects, nondestructive evaluation

Abstract

One of the major users of thin, unsurfaced hardwood lumber is the pallet manufacturing industry. Almost all manufactured products spend part of their life cycle on a pallet during transportation. This makes pallets a critical component of both the transportation and manufacturing sectors of the economy. Many newly constructed wooden pallets, however, are not currently manufactured to deliver the best performance (strength, durability, and safety)—despite interest by pallet users and pallet manufacturers—because manual grading and sorting of parts is impractical due to processing speeds and volume, labor costs, and laborer skill. This paper describes initial work aiming to create an automated grading/sorting system for hardwood pallet parts using ultrasonic. Experiments were conducted on yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera, L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra, L.) deckboards using pressure-contact, rolling transducers in a pitch-catch arrangement. Sound and unsound knots, cross grain, bark pockets, holes, splits, and decay were characterized using six ultrasound variables calculated from the received waveforms. Our scanning system shows good data-collection repeatability, and scanning rate has little effect on the calculated variables. For each defect type, at least one ultrasonic variable demonstrated significant capability to discriminate between that defect and clear wood. Energy loss variables exhibited the greatest sensitivity to many defect types. Based on the empirical relationships identified in this study, we are now developing models to classify defects using ultrasonic signal characteristics. Scanning properties of the prototype apparatus suggest that it can readily be translated into a commercial product.

References

Anon. 1994. Uniform Standard for Wood Pallets. National Wooden Pallet and Container Association. 37 pp.nBush. R. J., and P. A. Araman. 1998. Changes and trends in the pallet industry—Part J. Hardwood Market Report 76(9). 3 pp.nBush. R. J., V. S. Reddy, and P. A. Araman. 1997. Pallets: A growing source of recycled wood. Pages 24-28 in Use of recycled wood and paper in building applications. Proceedings No. 7286, Forest Products Society, Madison WI.nFuller, J. J., R. J. Ross, and J. R. Dramm. 1995. Nondestructive evaluation of honeycomb and surface check in red oak lumber. Forest Prod. J.45(5):42-44.nHalabe, H. B., H. V. S. GangaRao, and V. R. Hota. 1993. Nondestructive evaluation of wood using ultrasonic frequency analysis. Pages 2155-2160 in D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, eds. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Vol. 13. Plenum Press, New York, NY.nHalabe, H. B., H. V. S. GangaRao, and C. E. Solomon. 1994. Nondestructive evaluation of wood using ultrasonic dry-coupled transducers. Pages 2251-2256 in D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, eds. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Vol. 12. Plenum Press, New York, NY.nHalabe, H. B., H. V. S. GangaRao, S. H. Petro, and V. R. Hota. 1996. Assessment of defects and mechanical properties of wood members using ultrasonic frequency analysis. Materials Eval.54(2):314-352.nKabir, M. F., D. L. Schmoldt, and M. E. Schafer. 2000a. Ultrasonic detection of knots, cross grain, and bark pockets in wooden pallet parts. in Proc. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Whistler Resort, British Columbia, Canada. 8 pp.nKabir, M. F., D. L. Schmoldt, P. A. Araman, and M. E. Schafer. 2000b. Ultrasonic scanning for pallet parts grading. Pages 151-159 in D. O. Meyer, ed., Proc. 28th Annual Hardwood Symposium, Davis, West Virginia.nKarsulovic, J. T, L. A. Leon, and L. Gaete. 2000. Ultrasonic detection of knots and annual ring orientation in Pinus radiata lumber. Wood Fiber Sci.32(3):278-286.nMcDonald, K. A. 1980. Lumber defect detection by ultrasonic. Res. Pap. FPL-311, USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. 20 pp.nMcDonald, K. A., R. G. Cox, and E. H. Bulgrin. 1969. Locating lumber defects by ultrasonic. Res. Pap. FPL-120, USDA, Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. 11 pp.nNiemz, P., J. Kucera, M. Schob, and M. Scheffer. 1999. Possibility of defects detection in wood with ultrasound. Holz Roh- Werkst.57(2):96-102.nPatton-Mallory, M., and R. C. DeGroot. 1990. Detecting brown-rot decay in southern yellow pine by acousto-ultrasonics. Pages 24-29 in Proc. 7th International Nondestructive Testing of Wood Symposium, Madison, WI. Conference and Institute, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nRaczkowski, J., K. Lutomski, W. Molinski, and R. Wos. 1999. Detection of early stage of wood by acoustic emission technique. Wood Sci. Technol.33(5):353-358.nRoss, R. J., J. C. Ward, and A. Tenwolde. 1992. Identifying bacterially infected oak by stress wave nondestructive evaluation. FPL-RP-512, USDA Forest Service, Madison, WI. 6 pp.nSchmoldt, D. L., J. A. McCleod III, and P. A. Araman. 1993. Economics of grading and sorting pallets parts. Forest Prod. J.43:19-23.nSchmoldt, D. L., M. Morrone, and J. C. Duke Jr. 1994. Ultrasonic inspection of wooden pallets for grading and sorting. Pages 2161-2166 in D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, eds. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Vol. 12. Plenum Press, New York, NY.nSchmoldt, D. L., R. M. Nelson, and R. J. Ross. 1996. Ultrasonic defect detection in wooden pallet parts for quality sorting. Pages 285-295 in S. Doctor, C. A. Lebowitz, and G. Y. Baaklin, eds., SPIE 2944.nSchmoldt, D. L., R. M. Nelson, R. J. Ross. and K. A. McDonald. 1997. Ultrasonic inspection of wooden pallet parts using time-of-flight. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. 16:1791-1797. Plenum Press, New York, NY.nSzymani, R., and K. A. McDonald. 1981. Defect detection in lumber: State of the art. Forest Prod. J.31(11): 34-44.nWilcox, W. W. 1988. Detection of early stages of wood decay with ultrasonic pulse velocity. Forest Prod. J.38(5):68-73.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions