Effects Of Wood Anatomy On The Mechanical Behavior Of Single-Bolted Connections
Keywords:Bearing stress, bolted timber connections, failure mode, micromechanical properties, video microscopy
AbstractThis study combined mechanical testing of full-size bolted connections, determination of micromechanical properties of individual growth rings within the full-size specimens, and video microscopy for anatomical and mechanical measurements. Hard maple (Acer spp.) and northern red oak (Quercus rubra) specimens representative of single-bolted connections were tested to failure in bearing stress and analyzed using video microscopy methods. Maximum crushing strength of individual growth rings was obtained from specimens that were 1 mm X 1 mm in cross section and 4 mm along the grain. Anatomical measurements of cell-wall thickness, percent vessels in a given area, and ray width were obtained for each species and correlated to failure mode. It was concluded that maple had a consistent failure mode, while oak had a variable failure mode. The difference in failure modes is attributed to the different anatomical structures of the two species, mainly, ray and vessel size. Bearing stress was not statistically significantly influenced by the different anatomical features; however, stiffness in compression was.
American Forest and Paper Association. (Afpa) 1991. National design specifications for wood construction. Washington, DC. 125 pp.nAmerican Society For Testing and Materials. (Astm) 1986a. ASTM Standard D-2016-83 Standard test methods for moisture content of wood. Method A, Ovendry Method. Philadelphia. PA.nAmerican Society For Testing and Materials. (Astm) 1986b. ASTM Standard D-2395-83. Standard test methods for specific gravity of wood and wood-based materials. Philadelphia, PA.nAmerican Society For Testing and Materials. (Astm) 1993. Standard test methods for mechanical fasteners in wood. ASTM D 1761. Annual Book of Standards, Section 4, Volume 4.09, 1993. Philadelphia, PA.nBariska. M., and L. J. Kucera. 1985. On the fracture morphology of wood. Part 2: Macroscopical deformations upon ultimate axial compression in wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 19(1): 19-34.nBodig, J. 1965. The effect of anatomy on the initial stress-strain relationship in transverse compression. Forest Prod. J. 15(5):197-202.nBodig, J., and B. A. Jayne. 1982. Mechanics of wood and wood composites. New York, NY. Van Nostrand Rein-hold, xxi, 712 pp.nChoi, D., J. L. Thorpe, W. A. Coté, and R. B. Hanna. 1996. Quantisation of compression failure propagation in wood using digital image pattern recognition. Forest Prod. J. 46(10):87-93.nCôté, W. A., and R. B. Hanna. 1983. Ultrastructural characteristics of wood fracture surfaces. Wood Fiber Sci. 15(2):135-163.nFantozzi, J., and P. E. Humphrey. 1995. Effects of bending moments on the tensile performance of multiple-bolted timber connectors. Part 1: A technique to model such joints. Wood Fiber Sci. 27(1):55-67.nHilson, B. O., L. R. J. Whale, D. J. Pope, and I. Smith. 1987. Characteristic properties of nailed and bolted joints under short-term lateral load. Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of embedment test data in terms of density related trends. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 11(2):65-71.nHumphrey, P. E., and L. J. Ostman. 1989a. Bolted timber connections. Part I: A wafer technique to model wood deformation around bolts. Wood Fiber Sci. 21(3):239-251.nHumphrey, P. E., and L. J. Ostman. 1989b. Bolted timber connections. Part II: Bolt bending and associated wood deformation. Wood Fiber Sci. 21(4):354-366.nKermani, A., and W. M. C. McKenzie. 1994. The use of single-beam reflection holography to determine strain distributions around bolts. J. Instit. Wood Sci. 13(4): 454-458.nKucera, L. J., and M. Bariska. 1982. On the failure morphology in wood. Part 1: A SEM-study of deformations in wood of spruce and aspen upon ultimate axial compression load. Wood Sci. Technol. 16(1982):241-259.nJohansen, K. W. 1949. Theory of timber connections. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. Vol. 9, pp. 249-262.nLarsen, H. J. 1992. Eurocode Overview. Presentation at FPRS International Workshop on Wood Connections, November. 1992, Las Vegas, NV.nLhuede. E. P. 1987. Loads in bolted timber joints stressed perpendicular to the grain. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 11(2):17-25.nMcLain, T. E. and S. Thangjitham. 1983. Bolted wood-joint yield model. J. Struct. Eng. 109(8):1820-1835.nMaeglin. R. R. 1976. Natural variation of tissue proportions and vessel and fiber lengths in northern red oak. Silvac Genet. 25(3/4):122-126.nPanshin, A. J., and C. De Zeeuw. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. 722 pp.nRahman, M. U., Y. J. Chiang, and R. E. Rowlands. 1991. Stress and failure analysis of double-bolted joints in Douglas-fir and Sitka spruce. Wood Fiber Sci. 23:567-589.nRowlands, R. E., M. U. Rahman, T. L. Wilkinson, and Y. I. Chiang. 1982. Single- and multiple-bolted joints in orthotropic materials. Composites 13(3):273-279.nSalinekovich, A., J. R. Loferski, and A. G. Zink. 1996. Understanding the performance of laterally loaded wood connections assembled with multiple bolts. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI. Wood Design Focus. 7(4):19-26.nSchneiwind, A. P. 1959. Transverse anisotropy of wood. Forest Prod. J. 9(10):350-359.nSoltis, L. A., F. K. Hubbard, and T. L. Wilkinson. 1986. Bearing strength of bolted timber joints. J. Struct. Eng. 112(9):2141-2153.nStelmokas, J. W., A. G. Zink, and J. R. Loferski. 1997. Image correlation analysis of multiple bolted wood connections. Wood Fiber Sci. 29(3):210-227.nTrayer, G. W. 1932. The bearing strength of wood under bolts. Technical Bulletin No. 332. USDA. Washington, DC. 40 pp.nUmbaugh, S. E. 1998. Computer vision and image processing: A practical approach using CVIPtools. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 504 pp.nUsda Forest Service. 1987. Wood handbook: USDA Agric. Handb. 72 (rev.) USDA Forest Service, Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. 466 pp.nWong, C. M. S., and F. L. Matthews. 1981. A finite element analysis of single and two-hole bolted joints in fibre reinforced plastic. J. Composite Mater. 14:481-491.nWilkinson, T. L., and R. E. Rowlands. 1981. Analysis of mechanical joints in wood. Exp. Mech. 21(11):408-414.nZink, A. G., R. W. Davidson, and R. B. Hanna. 1995. Strain measurement in wood using a digital image correlation technique. Wood Fiber Sci. 27(4):346-359.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.