Improvement of Prediction Accuracy of Glulam Modulus of Elasticity by Considering Neutral Axis Shift in Bending


  • Kug-Bo Shim
  • Kwang-Mo Kim
  • Joo-Saeng Park


Glulam, MOE, transformed section method, neutral axis, reinforcement


There is a discrepancy between the estimated modulus of elasticity (MOE) of glulam based on the dynamic MOE of laminates and measured MOE. The discrepancy is greater for glulam manufactured with mixed species. This study was undertaken to reduce the discrepancy between those MOE values. The error rate of predicting MOE of glulam by the transformed section method, without considering tension and compression modulus differences, was about 30%. To estimate the MOE of glulam more accurately, the differences between compression and tension modulus should be taken into account in the transformed section method. The measured tensile and compressive strain at the center of glulam under a bending load showed the movement of neutral axis toward the tension side of glulam. Therefore, the compression and tension modulus differences for each species should be identified before estimating the MOE of glulam. The prediction of glulam MOE was improved significantly by reflecting the ratio of compression and tension modulus vs dynamic MOE of laminates. The outermost of laminates in the compression side under bending load experienced plastic behavior and failure. This caused the neutral axis to move to the tension side and increased tension stress to cause the glulam to fail abruptly in tension. To improve the bending performance of glulam, reinforcing compression laminates need to be considered.


ASTM (2003) Standard practice for evaluating allowable properties for grades of structural lumber. D2915-03. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2005) Standard practice for establishing allowable properties for structural glued laminated timber (glulam). D3737-05. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nBodig J, Jayne BA (1981) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY. 712 pp.nJanowiak JJ, Hindman DP, Manbeck HB (2001) Orthotropic behaviour of lumber composite materials. Wood Fiber Sci 33(4):580 - 594.nKim KM, Shim KB, Park JS, Kim WS, Lim JA, Yeo H (2007) Development of pitch pine glued laminated timber for structural use—Improvement of bending capacity of pitch pine glulam by using domestic larch laminars. Mokchae Konghak 35(6):13 - 22.nKS (2005) Structural glued laminated timber. F3021. Korean Standards Association. Seoul, Korea.nLee JJ, Kim GC (2000) Study on the estimation of the strength properties of structural glued laminated timber. I: Determination of optimum MOE as input variable. J Wood Sci 46:115 - 121.nLee JJ, Park JS, Kim KM, Oh JK (2005) Prediction of bending properties for structural glulam using optimized distributions of knot characteristics and laminar MOE. J Wood Sci 51:640 - 647.nSchneider MH, Philips JG (1991) Elasticity of wood and wood polymer composites in tension compression and bending. Wood Sci Technol 25:361 - 364.nYadama V, Wolcott MP, Smith LV (2006) Elastic properties of wood-strand composites with undulating strands. Compos Part A-Appl S 37(3):385 - 392.n






Research Contributions