Veneer Recovery Prediction and Analysis Through Computer Simulation
An analytical procedure was developed which features the use of a simulation model in the analysis of grade recovery and yield in the production of rotary cut veneer. This analytical method differs from previous efforts in this field in that it permits simultaneous analysis for several veneer grades under a set of priorities built into the program.
A technique was developed for transferring green veneer characteristic data from photographs to digital form, using electronic equipment to allow rapid and accurate data collection. Data were recorded in X-Y coordinates and stored on magnetic tape compatible to available electronic computer systems.
A computer program was subsequently developed to predict veneer recovery in two, three, or four grades simultaneously, using the veneer characteristic data on tape as input. Three major variables in the veneer production operation—grade requirements, sheet widths, and clipping specifications—can be manipulated. This feature allows evaluation of effects on veneer yield of changes in these variables by simply reprocessing the same basic data under different sets of conditions. Results of several trial runs, using a number of combinations of variable conditions, are included to demonstrate several possible applications of the program.
Anonymous. 1950. Hardwood Research Program of the National Lumber Manufacturers Association, National Hardwood Lumber Association.nBethel, J. S., and C. A. Hart. 1960. Techniques for the development of rational grading systems for hardwood veneer logs. Forest Prod. J. 10(6): 296-301.nDunmire, D., and G. H. Englerth. 1967. Development of a computer program for predicting lumber cutting yields. Research Note NC-15, North Central Forest Experiment Station.nDunmire, D., and G. H. Englerth. 1966. Programming for lumber yield. Forest Prod. J. 16(19): 67-69.nFlann, I. B., F. M. Lamb, and R. W. Nielson. 1967. Hard maple raw material for furniture components: Effect of sawmill edging practice on the yield. Forest Prod. J. 17(10): 29-34.nHart, C. A., and R. J. Thomas. 1962. An analysis of descriptive data for the development of hardwood bolt grades. Technical Report No. 12, North Carolina State College, Raleigh.nHenley, J. W., R. O. Woodfin, and H. H. Haskell. 1963. Recommended veneer grades for the development of hardwood veneer log grades. Research Paper FPL-9, Forest Products Lab., Madison.nMasachi, J. E. 1956. The development of veneer log grades for certain southern hardwoods. Unpublished M.S. thesis, North Carolina State College, Raleigh.nPeter, R. K., and J. H. Bamping. 1962. Theoretical sawing of pine logs. Forest Prod. J. 17(11): 549-557.nPeter, R. K. 1967. Influence of sawing methods for lumber grade yield from yellow poplar. Forest Prod. J. 17(11): 19-24.nProduct Standards Section, National Bureau Of Standards. 1966. U. S. product standard PSI-66 for softwood plywood-construction and industrial. U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.nRand, L. R. 1955. Some factors influencing the yield of red gum veneer. Unpublished M.S. thesis, North Carolina State College, Raleigh.nThomas, R. J. 1962. The rough end research program. Forest Prod. J. 12(11): 536-537.nThomas, R. J. 1965. The yield of dimension stock from hardwood lumber. Technical Report No. 21, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.nWhite, C. H. 1950. Walnut yields. American Walnut Manufacturers Association, Chicago.nWodzinski, C., and E. Hahn. 1966. A Computer program to determine yields of lumber. U.S. Forest Products Lab., Madison.nWylie, A. E. 1950. A statistical study of small dimension yield from hard maple. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, College of Forestry, Syracuse.nYandle, D. O. 1954. A method of sampling the yield from yellow poplar veneer bolts. Unpublished M.S. thesis, North Carolina State College, Raleigh.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.