Fungal Decay Resistance and Dimensional Stability of Loblolly Pine Reacted with 1,6-Diisocyanatohexane

Authors

  • George C. Chen

Keywords:

Cross-linked wood, 1, 6-diisocyanatohexane, fungal resistance, dimensional stability, loblolly pine, Gloeophyllum trabeum, Pinus taeda

Abstract

Wood reacted with 1,6-diisocyanatohexane resisted fungal attack and had improved dimensional stability. At 25.8% chemical weight gain, the reacted wood had no weight loss by the brown-rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum; at 20.9% and 23.8% chemical weight gains, the reacted wood had antishrink efficiencies (ASEs) of 58% and 61%, respectively, with a small loss of 3% ASE after four cycles of water swelling and drying treatment. At 26.1% chemical weight gain, the reacted wood lost 5.8% bonded diisocyanate in a 12-week soil-block decay test. Evidence of cross-linking between wood and 1,6-diisocyanatohexane was provided by the characteristic carbamate infrared absorption. In the absence of water, 1,6-diisocyanatohexane reacted with wood to form cross-linking wood as the only product; in the presence of water, diisocyanate reacted preferentially with water to form mainly ureas with a small amount of biurets. These chemicals were deposited in the cell lumen of wood. Water vapor sorption of wood reacted with 1,6-diisocyanatohexane indicated that the decay resistance of this modified wood is probably due to the inability of the modified cell wall of wood to absorb sufficient water to support decay.

References

ASTM. 1990. Standard method of testing wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures. D 1413-86. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.nBurmester, A. 1967. Tests for wood treatment with monomeric gas formaldehyde using gamma rays. Holzforschung 21(1):13-20.nConley, R. T. 1970. Infrared spectroscopy. Allyn and Bacon Inc., Boston, MA. Pp. 102-110.nEaton, P. E., and K. Pramod. 1990. Cubaourea: A cubane-propellane. J. Org. Chem. 55:5746-5750.nEllis, W. D., and R. M. Rowell. 1984. Reaction of isocyanates with southern pine wood to improve dimensional stability and decay resistance. Wood Fiber Sci. 16(3):349-356.nGoldstein, I. S., E. B. Jeroski, A. E. Lund, J. F. Nielson, and J. W. Weaver. 1961. Acetylation of wood in lumber thickness. Forest Prod. J. 11(8):363-370.nHartman, S. 1977. Polyurethane foams from the reaction of bark and diisocyanate. Pages 257-269 in I. S. Goldstein, ed. American Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 43. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.nHunt, G. M., and G. A. Garratt. 1953. Wood preservation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd ed. Pp. 25-28.nImamura, Y., and K. Nishimoto. 1986. Resistance of acetylated wood to attack by subterranean termites. 2nd Annual Meeting of the Japan Wood Technol. Assoc. Wood, Res. No. 72:37-44.nJohnson, B. R., and R. M. Rowell. 1989. Resistance of chemically modified wood to marine borers. Mater. Org. 23(2):147-156.nMarchessault, R. H. 1960. Application of infrared spectroscopy to cellulose and wood polysaccharides. Pure Appl. Chem. 5:107-129.nMarchessault, R. H., and C. Y. Liang. 1962. The infrared spectra of crystalline polysaccharides. XIII. Xylan. Polym. Sci. 59: 357-378.nPhil, L. O., and I. Olsson. 1968. Treating wood and wood fiber material. British Patent 1,101,777.nRowell, R. M. 1975. Chemical modification of wood: Advantages and disadvantages. In Proceedings, American Wood-Preservers' Assoc. Conf., April 28-30, 1975, San Francisco, CA.nRowell, R. M. 1977. Nonconventional wood preservation methods. Pages 47-56 in I. S. Goldstein, ed. American Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 43. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.nRowell, R. M. 1982. Wood preservation and stabilization by chemical modification of the wood substance. Pages 32-49 in Chemical aspects of wood technology. STFI Series A, No. 772. Swedish Forest Products Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.nRowell, R. M. 1983. Chemical modification of wood: A review. Forest Products Abstracts 6(12):363-382. Commonwealth Forestry Bureau, Oxford, England.nRowell, R. M., and W. D. Ellis. 1979. Determination of dimensional stability of wood using the water-soak method. Wood Fiber 10(2):104-111.nRowell, R. M., and D. I. Gutzmer. 1975. Chemical modification of wood: Reactions of alkylene oxides with southern yellow pine. Wood Sci. 7(3):240-246.nRowell, R. M., S. V. Hart, and G. R. Esenther. 1979. Resistance of alkylene-oxide modified southern pine to attack by subterranean termites. Wood Sci. 11(4):271-274.nSocrates, G. 1980. Infrared characteristic group frequencies. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Pp. 114-453.nStamm, A. J. 1959. Dimensional stabilization of wood by thermal reactions and formaldehyde cross-linking. Tappi 42(1):39-44.nStamm, A. J., and R. H. Baechler. 1960. Decay resistance and dimensional stability of five modified woods. Forest Prod. J. 10(1):22-26.nStevens, M., J. Schalck, and J. van RaemdoncK. 1979. Chemical modification of wood by vapour-phase treatment with formaldehyde and sulphur dioxide. Intern. J. Wood Preserv. 1(2):57-68.nTarkow, H., and A. J. Stamm. 1953. Effect of formaldehyde treatments upon the dimensional stabilization of wood. Forest Prod. J. 3:33-37.nTarkow, H., A. J. Stamm, and E. C. O. Erickson. 1950. Acetylated wood. FPL Rep. 1593. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nWakita, H., H. Onishi, S. Todai, and T. Goto. 1977. Studies on the improvement of wood materials. XVIII. Vapor phase reaction of 2,4-tolylene diisocyanate. Zairyo 26(284):460-464.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-28

Issue

Section

Research Contributions