Butt Joint Reinforcement in Parallel-Laminated Veneer (PLV) Lumber

Authors

  • D. S. Larson
  • L. B. Sandberg
  • T. L. Laufenberg
  • G. P. Krueger
  • R. E. Rowlands

Keywords:

Parallel-laminated veneer (PLV), laminated veneer lumber (LVL), joints, buttjoints, stress analysis, design, reinforcement

Abstract

Parallel-laminated veneer (PLV) is a high-strength structural material consisting of thin parallel-laminated wood veneers. The use of graphite-cloth reinforcement, placed on either side of a butt joint in 1 1/2- by 3 1/2- by 32-inch Douglas-fir PLV tensile members, was assessed. The finite-element method of analysis was used to predict the behavior in different unreinforced and reinforced butt-jointed PLV tensile members. Relationships between the reinforcing parameters—length, modulus of elasticity, and thickness—and the stresses in the wood and reinforcement components were developed by regression analysis techniques. The reinforcing mechanism reduced the peak stresses at the butt joint and hence increased the ultimate strength of the member. Design of PLV material whose strength is limited by shear stresses that develop at the butt joint is facilitated by use of the proposed relationships.

Experimental testing confirmed the predictions of the finite-element analysis. Failure initiated at the unreinforced joint in the specimens. Average tensile strength increased and variability decreased in reinforced specimens. Application of a small amount of reinforcement at the butt joint has been shown to enhance PLV performance.

References

American Institute of Timber Construction. 1974. Timber construction manual, 2nd ed. 2.24-2.31. John Wiley and Sons, New York.nAmerican Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Division. 1975. Wood structures. 32-38, 55-58. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., New York.nBathe, K., E. L. Wilson, and F. E. Peterson. 1974. SAP IV, National Testing Information. National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA.nBohlen, J. C. 1974. Tensile strength of Douglas-fir laminated veneer lumber. For. Prod. J. 24(1):54-58.nForest Products Laboratory. 1974. Wood handbook. Agriculture Handbook 72. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.nHete'nyi, M. 1950. Handbook of experimental stress analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.nJohnson, N. L., and F. C. Leone. 1977. Statistics and experimental design, vol. 2, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.nKoch, P. 1974. Strength of beams with laminae located according to stiffness. For. Prod. J. 14(10):456-460.nKoch, P., and B. Bohannan. 1965. Beam strength as affected by placement of laminae. For. Prod. J. 15(7):289-295.nKoch, P., and G. E. Woodson. 1968. Laminating butt-jointed log-run southern pine veneers into long beams of high strength. For. Prod. J. 18(10):45-57.nLaufenberg, T. L., R. E. Rowlands, and G. P. Krueger. 1984. The economic feasibility of synthetic fiber reinforced laminated veneer lumber (LVL). For. Prod. J. 34(4):15-22.nPenny, D. T. 1977. Fracture mechanics analysis of butt joints in laminated wood beams. Master's thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.nRowlands, R. E., R. Vandeweghe, T. L. Laufenberg, and G. P. Krueger. 1985. Fiber-reinforced wood composites. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(1):39-57.nSavin, G. N. 1961. Stress concentration around holes. Pergamon Press, New York.nSliker, A. 1971. Resistance strain gages and adhesives for wood. For. Prod. J. 21(12):40-43.nSpaun, F. D. 1979. Reinforcement of the tensile strength and bending stiffness of wood with fiberglass. Master's thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-22

Issue

Section

Research Contributions