Image analysis to assess wood variability in longleaf pine cross-sectional disks
Abstract
Image analysis is an important method for rapidly measuring wood property variation, but it is infrequently applied to disks collected from forestry studies. The objective of this study was to compare image estimated wood and bark volumes and diameters to reference measurements, and to extract more information from the images including the shape (out of round index, eccentric pith) and the amount and location of severe compression wood. A total of 1,120 disks were cut from multiple height levels of 48 defect-free and 56 defect-containing longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) trees from 16 stands across Georgia (U.S.). Disks were machined on one transverse surface using a computer numeric controlled router to prepare a clean surface for imaging. Three images; one under white light, second under blue light, and third under blue light with a green longpass filter, were taken for each disk. Volumes and diameters estimated from images were in close agreement with reference methods. Linear models fitted as measured versus image volumes for wood and bark had coefficient of determination (R2) values of >0.99 and 0.96. Linear models fitted as measured versus image diameters had R2 values of >0.99. Out of round index and pith eccentricity values calculated from images showed a moderate positive correlation (R=0.43). Algorithms developed were able to correctly identify severe compression wood, but not mild to moderate compression wood. Severe compression wood was moderately correlated to out of round index (R=0.54) and pith eccentricity (R=0.48). More than 98% of the disks having severe compression wood came from defect-containing trees.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.