DECAY OF BIRDSEYE SUGAR MAPLE (ACER SACCHARUM) AND CURLY RED MAPLE (ACER RUBRUM) FIGURED WOODS
Keywords:
Acer saccharum, Acer rubrum, figured wood, biodeterioration, wood preservation, spaltingAbstract
Two figured woods, commonly known as birdseye maple (Acer saccharum, sugar maple) and curly maple (Acer rubrum, red maple), were exposed to brown rot and white rot fungi in a standard laboratory decay test and compared with unfigured wood of each species, respectively. For the birdseye maple, two levels of figure intensity were used: wood with heavy figure and wood with light figure. Heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly less by the brown rot fungus Rhodonia placenta than unfigured maple wood or lightly figured maple wood. However, heavily figured birdseye maple wood was decayed significantly more by two white rot fungi, Trametes versicolor and Irpex lacteus, than unfigured maple wood but was not decayed significantly more than lightly figured wood. For both brown rot and white rot fungi, lightly figured birdseye maple wood did not decay significantly differently compared with unfigured wood. Likewise, there was no significant difference in decay between curly red maple wood and unfigured red maple wood for either brown rot or white rot fungi. Results suggest chemical or anatomical differences in the heavily figured birdseye sugar maple wood affect decay by brown rot and white rot fungi. These findings may be useful to hobbyists and woodworkers needing to protect wood or who partially decay wood to produce spalted wood for decorative purposes.
References
Analytical Software (2008) Statistix user manual, release 9.0 for windows. Analytical Software, Tallahasse, FL.
ASTM (1995) Standard test method for wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures. Standard D1413-76. Pages 207-213 in ASTM annual book of standards Vol. 4.10. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
AWPA (2016) Technical subcommittee P6, E10-16, laboratory method for evaluating the decay resistance of wood- based materials against pure basidiomycete cultures: Soil/ block test. Pages 408-419 in American wood protection association standard. American Wood Protection Association, Birmingham, AL.
Bailey LF (1948) Figured wood: A study of methods of production. J Forestry 46(2):119-125.
Beals HO, Davis TC (1977) Figure in wood—An illustrated review. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin
, Auburn University, Auburn, AL. 5 pp.
Bragg DC (1999) The birdseye figured grain in sugar maple (Acer saccharum): Literature review, nomenclature, and structural characteristics. Can J For Res 29(11):1637-1648.
Bragg DC, Mroz GD, Reed DD, Shetron SG, Stokke DD (1997) Relationship between “birdseye” sugar maple (Acer saccharum) occurrence and its environment. Can J For Res 27(8):1182-1191.
De Groot RC, Evans JW, Forsyth PG, Freitag CM, Morrell JJ (1998) Soil-contact decay tests using small blocks: A procedural analysis. Research Paper FPL, RP-571. USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. 7 pp.
Donovan G, Nicholls D (2003) Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for character-marked cabinets from Alaska birch. Forest Prod J 53(11-12):27-32.
Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L (1994) European polypores. Part 2: Meripilus-Tyromyces. Fungiflora A/S, Oslo, Norway.
Hoadley RB (1990) Identifying wood: Accurate results with simple tools. Taunton Press, Newtown, CT. 223 pp.
Lindquist M (1977) Spalted wood. Rare jewels from death and decay. Fine Woodwork 7:50-53.
Novitskaya LL, Nikolaeva NN, Tarelkina TV (2016) Endogenous variability of the figured wood of Karelian birch. Wulfenia 23:175-188.
Rayner ADM, Boddy L (1988) Fungal decomposition of wood: Its biology and ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Bath, UK. 587 pp.
Rioux D, Yamada T, Simard M, Lessard G, Rheault FJ, Blouin D (2003) Contribution to the fine anatomy and histochemistry of birdseye sugar maple. Can J Res 33(5): 946-958.
Schmidt O (2006) Wood and tree fungi: Biology, damage, protection and use. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 334 pp.
Velling P, Vihera-Aarnio A, Hagqvist R, Lehto J (2000)
Valuable wood as a result of abnormal cambial activity— The case of Betula pendula var. carelica. Pages 377-386 in RA Savidge, JR Barnett, and R Napier, eds. Cell and molecular biology of wood formation. BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited, Oxford, U.K.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.