Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Influence of cotton fiber properties on the microstructural characteristics of mercerized fibers by regression analysis

Hua Wang, Amjad Farooq, Hafeezullah Memon

Abstract


This study is conducted on a raw material imported from several countries for the purpose of promoting the development of the world’s cotton spinning industry. If the time for selecting the raw material as well as the quality of the cotton spinning is improved, then time and money will be saved and the spinning industry will be improved. For this study, different cotton fibers were selected from different ecological regions. The cotton fibers were processed using the mercerization process, and then they were examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform IR (FTIR) and scanning electronic microscope (SEM). High-volume instrument study was conducted to evaluate the physical properties of cotton fibers, including short fiber content, tensile strength, elongation at break, Micronaire value, and upper half mean length. In addition a change in fiber strength, the degree of crystallinity, and degree of orientation of cotton fibers before and after mercerization was also examined. SEM results show that the surface of cotton fibers became smooth and shiny after the treatment. FTIR and XRD revealed that the chemical composition did not change, but the degree of crystallinity decreased and the degree of orientation of alkalized cotton fibers increased after mercerization. In the second phase of this study, a correlation analysis was made between the physical properties of cotton fibers and the microstructural properties of alkalized cotton samples. This analysis revealed that the breaking strength of cotton fibers is strongly negatively correlated with the crystallinity of cotton fibers. The higher the tensile strength, the lower the crystallinity of cotton fibers, which leads to better mechanical properties of the end product. The degree of the orientation of cotton fibers is highly correlated with a tensile strength of cotton fibers. Xinjiang-Cn, BG-Au, and BG-Tu samples exhibited relatively better physical properties. 
BG-Au, BG-Tu, and Pakistan samples have higher values of tensile strength and lower values of yellowness; moreover, the raw material from these samples can be preferred according to correlation analysis. Correlation analysis between physical properties reveals that the tensile strength of cotton fibers is positively correlated with the Micronaire value; however, the correlation is not strong because of the lower value of the correlation coefficient as 0.4809.


Keywords


degree of crystallinity; mercerization; physical properties; microstructural properties

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen H (2014) Chemical composition and structure of natural lignocellulose. Biotechnology of lignocellulose. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 25-71.

El Mogahzy YE, Broughton R Jr., Lynch W (1990) A statistical approach for determining the technological value of cotton using HVI fiber properties. Textile Res J 60(9): 495-500.

Ethridge D, Zhu R (1996) Prediction of rotor spun cotton yarn quality: A comparison of neural network and regression algorithms. Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 9-12, 1996, Nashville, TN. Editors: C. Paul Dugger & Debbie A. Richter.

Garner WE, Shanklin EH, LaFerney PE (1970) Fiber quality and ginning performance of machine picked and stripped cotton, southeastern area, 1964-66. U.S. Dep Agric Mark Res Rep 1964–66. Marketing Research Report No. 852, USDA-ARS, Washington, DC, 1970, p. 30.

Gordon S, Hsieh Y-L (2006) Cotton: Science and technology. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England.

Hearle JWS, Sparrow JT (1979) Mechanics of the extension of cotton fibers. I. Experimental studies of the effect of convolutions. J Appl Polym Sci 24:1465-1477.

Hosseinali F (2012) Investigation on the tensile properties of individual cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibers. Thesis for Master of Science, Texas Tech University, Texas, US.

Hussain G, Iyer KK, Patil N (1982) Influence of mercerization and crosslinking on the dynamic and static moduli of cotton yarns. Textile Res J 52(10):663-665.

Lawrence CA (2003) Fundamentals of spun yarn technology. CRC Press, New York, USA.

Li Y, Yeung K, Shen Y, Newton E, Yao L (2003) The World Trade Organization and international denim trading. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England.

Liu J, Wang F (2011) Influence of mercerization on microstructure and properties of kapok blended yarns with different blending ratios. J Eng Fibers Fabrics 6(3):63-68.

Long R L, Bange M P, Gordon SG, van der Sluijs MH, Naylor G R, Constable GA (2010) Fiber quality and textile performance of some Australian cotton genotypes. Crop Sci 50(4):1509-1518.

Majumdar PK, Majumdar A (2004) Predicting the breaking elongation of ring spun cotton yarns using mathematical, statistical, and artificial neural network models. Textile Res J 74(7):652-655.

Memon H, Ali Khoso N, Memon S (2015) Effect of dyeing parameters on physical properties of fibers and yarns. Int J Appl Sci Eng Res 4(4):401-407.

Negm MA, Sanad S, Kugler G (2015) A comparison of HVI, AFIS and CCS cotton testing method. 12th Meeting of the Inter-Regional Cooperative Research Network on Cotton for the Mediterranean and Middle East Region, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, October 6-10, 2015.

O’sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: The structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4(3):173-207.

Okano T, Sarko A (1984) Mercerization of cellulose. I. X-ray diffraction evidence for intermediate structures. J Appl Polym Sci 29(12):4175-4182.

Okano T, Sarko A (1985) Mercerization of cellulose. II. Alkali–cellulose intermediates and a possible mercerization mechanism. J Appl Polym Sci 30(1):325-332.

Ozturk HB, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Abu-Rous M, MacNaughtan B, Schuster KC, Mitchell JR, Bechtold T (2009) Changes in the intra-and inter-fibrillar structure of lyocell (TENCEL®) fibers caused by NaOH treatment. Cellulose 16(1):37.

Patel G, Iyer PB, Sreenivasan S, Iyer KK (1990) Reversals in cotton: A study with scanning Electron microscopy. Textile Res J 60(12):771-774.

Saville BP (1999) Physical testing of textiles. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England.

Ugbolue SCO (1990) Structure/property relationships in textile fibres. Textile Prog 20(4):1-43.

Wakelyn PJ, Bertoniere NR, French AD, Thibodeaux DP, Triplett BA, Rousselle M-A, Goynes WR Jr., Edwards JV, Hunter L, McAlister DD (2006) Cotton fiber chemistry and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 95 pp.

Wang X, Zhang L, Evers JB, Mao L, Wei S, Pan X, Zhao X, van der Werf W, Li Z (2014) Predicting the effects of environment and management on cotton fibre growth and quality: A functional–structural plant modelling approach. AoB Plants 6:plu040.

Yang S, Gordon S (2016) A study on cotton fibre elongation measurement. 33rd International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, March 16-18, 2016.

Yue Y, Han G, Wu Q (2013) Transitional properties of cotton fibers from cellulose I to cellulose II structure. Bio-Resources 8(4):6460-6471.

Zeronian SH, Alger KW, Cabradilla KE (1976) Tensile properties of cotton treated with alkali metal hydroxides. J Appl Polym Sci 20:1689-1693.

Zhou Y, Zhao M, Ma H, Xia X-m (2008) Effect of verticillium wilt with different grades on main cotton yield characters. Shandong Agric Sci 9:81-83.


Refbacks