Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A REVIEW OF WOOD-BARK ADHESION: METHODS AND MECHANICS OF DEBARKING FOR WOODY BIOMASS

Azadwinder Singh Chahal, Daniel Ciolkosz

Abstract


Debarking systems and strategies are used to increase the value of woody biomass by separating wood and bark into two value-added product streams. Several debarking methods have been used for the removal of bark from wood. The selection of a debarking method is often based on the wood type and its end use. Debarking methods discussed briefly in this review include drum debarking, ring debarking, cradle debarking, chain flail debarking, high-pressure water jet debarking, compression debarking, and biodebarking. The performance of these debarking methods is highly dependent on operational parameters of machines, properties and type of woody biomass, and pretreatments. A universal applicable mechanistic model of the debarking process would be especially valuable for the development and optimization of debarking systems. In this respect, the competing objectives of high bark removal, low wood damage, high throughput, and low energy must be balanced against one another to arrive at a truly optimized approach. Wood-bark bond strength plays a vital role in impacting the effectiveness and efficiency of debarking technology. Thus, it is important to understand how mechanical properties of the wood-bark interface are influenced by different factors. Key factors that affect the wood-bark bond strength include MC, harvest season, wood species, temperature, and direction of applied load. The likely reason why MC affects the wood-bark adhesion strength is that the constituent elements of primary plant cell walls (cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin) behave differently when they are exposed to water molecules. For example, there is negligible change in the length if cellulose microfibrils when exposed to water molecules. However, characteristics of hemicellulose and pectin behave differently than cellulose when they contact with water molecules. Also, the difference in the adhesion strength of wood-bark bond among varieties of woody plants is possibly due to the difference in density of cross linkages of homogalacturonan pectin by Ca2., and arabinan and galactan side chains of pectin. The relevance of this information to the debarking process is discussed.


Keywords


Keywords: Cambium, Debarking, Lignocellulose, Plant cell walls, Pectin, Wood-bark adhesion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baron EO, Gharyal P, Schindler M (1988) Pectins as mediators of wall porosity in soybean cells. Planta 175: 389-395. doi.org/10.1007/BF00396345

Baroth R (2005) Literature review of the latest development of wood debarking. Control engineering laboratory. Univerity of Oulu. Report A no 27.

Bassler GA (1987) Producing pulp quality chips in the woods: A short term study on three portable delimber-debarker systems.

Bidhendi A, Geitmann A (2016) Relating the mechanics of primary plant cell wall to morphogenesis. Journal of experimental botany 67(2): 449-461. doi. org/10.1093/jxb/erv535.

Biswal A, Atmodjo M, Li M, Baxter H, Yoo, CG, Pu, Y, Lee YC., Mazarei M, Black IM, Zhang JY, Ramanna H, Bray AL, King ZR, LaFayettee PR, Pattathil S, Donohoe BS, Mohanty SS, Ryno D, Yee K, Thompson OA, Rodriguez M, Dumitrache A, Natzke J, Winkeler K, Colllins C, Xang X, Tan L, Sykes RW, Gjersing EL, Ziebell A, Turner GB, Decker SR, Hahn MG, Davidson BH, Udvardi MK, Mielenz JR, Davis MF, Nelson RS., Parrott WA, Ragauskas AJ, Stewart CN, Mohnen D, (2018) Sugar release and growth of biofuel crops are improved by downregulation of pectin biosynthesis. Nature Biotechnology 36(3): 249-257.

Caffall KH, Mohnen DM (2009). The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydrate Research 344: 1879 – 1900.

Chow S, Obermajer A (2004) Wood-to-bark adhesion of

subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) in extreme temperatures.

Wood Science and Technology 38:391-403.

Cochard H, Casella E, Mencuccini M (2007) Xylem vulnerability

to cavitation varies among popular and willow

clones and correlates with yield. Tree Physiol 27:

-1767.

Daher F, Braybrook S, (2015) How to let go: pectin and plant cell adhesion. Frontiers in plant science 6:523. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00523.

Derome D, Griffa M, Koebel M, Carmeliet J (2011) Hysteretic swelling of wood at cellular scale probed by phase-contrast X-ray tomography. J Struct Biol 173: 180–190.

Ding F, Ibrahim F, Gagne P, (2012) MPC based ring debarking process optimization. 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

Dou J, Galvis L, Mantila UH, Reza M, Tamminen T, Vuorinen T (2016) Morphology and overall chemical characterization of willow (salix sp.) inner bark and wood: Toward controlled deconstruction of willow biomass. ACI Sustainable Chem. Eng, 4: 3871-76.

Duchesne and Nylinder (1996) Measurement of the bark-wood shear strength: Practical methods to evaluate debarking resistance of norway spruce and scots pine pulpwood. Forest Products J 46: 57.

Eder M, Arnould O, Dunlop J, Hornatowska J, Salmen L (2013) Experimental micromechanical characterization of wood cell walls. Wood Sci Technol 47: 163-182.

Einspahr DW, Eperen RHV, Fiscus H (1982) Morphological and bark strength characteristics important to wood/bark adhesion in hardwoods. Wood and Fiber Science 16(3): 339-348.

Engelund E and Svensson S (2010) Modelling time-dependent mechanical behaviour of softwood using deformation kinetics. Holzforschung 65(2): 231-237. doi:10.1515/hf.2011.011

Engelund ET, Thygesen LG, Svenson S, Hill CAS (2013) A critical discussion of the physics of wood-water interactions. Wood Sci Technol 47: 141-161.

Fry S, (2004) Tansley review Primary cell wall metabolism: tracking the careers of wall polymers in living plant cells. New Phytologist 161: 641-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2003.00980.x

Gammage JL, Furnival GM (1957) Chemical debarking in

bottomland hardwoods. South Pulp Pap Manuf 20(9):

-80.

Grobbelaar FR and Manyuchi KT (2000) Eucalypt debarking: an international overview with a Southern African perspective. Forest Engineering Southern Africa.

Gupta ML, George DL, Bedane GM. (2015) Improving latex extraction technology by debarking guayule. Rural industries research and development corperation, Australain Government. RIRDC publication no 15/039. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.043

Gurusinghe SH (1994) The effects of irrigation, tree growth and ethephon on the mechanical strength of the cambial zone in almond trees. Prunus dulcis (Mill.) Webb 120(2): 87.

Gurusinghe SH and Shackel KA (1995) The relationship of cambial zone mechanical strength to growth and irrigation of almond. [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) Webb.] Trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120 (2): 170-76.

Ha M, Apperley D, Jarvis M (1997) Molecular rigidity in dry and hydrated onion cell walls. Plant Physiol 115: 593-598.

Harken JM, Rowe JW (1971) Bark and its possible uses. Forest products laboratory. U.S. Department of Agriculture. FPL-091.

Harpler P (2005) Calcium: A central regulator of plant growth and development. The Plant Cell 17: 2142-2155.

Hartsough B, Spinelli R, Pottle S, Klepac J (2000) Fiber recovery with chain flail delimbing/debarking and chipping of hybrid popular. Journal of Forest Engineering 11(2): 59-67.

Hediger S, Emsley L, Fisher M (1999) Solid-state NMR characterization of hydration effects on polymer mobility in onion cell-wall material. Carbohydrate Research. 322: 102-122.

Hoffman M., Jia Z, Peña M, Cash M, Harper A, Blackburn A, Darvill A, York W (2005) Structural analysis of xyloglucans in the primary cell walls of plants in the subclass Asteridae. Carbohydrate Research 340: 1826-1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2005.04.016

Hoffster K, Hinterstoisser B, Salmen L (2006) Moisture uptake in native cellulose-the role of different hydrogen bonds: a dynamic FT-IR study using deuterium exchange. Cellulose 13: 131-145

Isokangas A and Leiviska K (2005) Optimization of wood losses in log debarking drum. Paper and Timber 87: 324-328.

Isokangas A, Laitinen O, Hyvonen A, and Leiviska K (2006). The study of mechanical abrasion of logs in tumble debarking pilot drum. Conference paper. University of Oulu, Finland.

Jacob S, Perez D S, Dupont C, Commandré JM, Broust F, Carriau SD (2013) Short rotation forestry feedstock: Influence of particle size segregation on biomass properties. Fuel 111: 820–828.

Jarvis MC (1984) Structure and properties of pectin gels in plant cell walls. Plant, cell and environment 7: 153-164.

Jarvis MC (1998) Intercellular separation forces generated by intracellular pressure. Plant, cell and environment 21:1307-1310.

Jarvis M, Briggs S, Knox J (2003) Intercellular adhesion and cell separation in plants. Plants, Cell and Environment 26: 977-989.

Kenny WA, Forsse LS, Layton P (1990) A review of biomass quality research relevant to the use of popular and willow for energy conversion. Biomass 21: 163-188.

Koch P (1983) Utilization of hardwoods growing on southern pine site. Book Chapter 17,3.

Kubler H (1990) Natural loosing of the wood/bark bond: a review and synthesis. Forest Prod. J, 40(4), 25-31.

Kulasinski K (2016) Effects of water adsorption in hydrophilic polymers. Polymer science: research advances, practical applications and educational aspect.

Laganiere, B. and Hernandez, R. E. (2005) The effects of radial force and tip path overlap on the ring debarking efficiency of frozen balsam fir logs. Forest product journal, 55:44

Lionetti V, Francocci F, Ferrari S, Volpi C, Bellincampi D, Galletti D, Ovidio, RD, Lorenzo GD, Cervone F (2010) Engineering the cell wall by reducing de-methyl-esterified homogalacturonan improves saccharification of plant tissues for bioconversion, PNAS 107: 2. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0907549107

Mattson JA (1974) Beneficiation of compression debarked wood chips. North central forest experiment station, forest service. U.S. Department of agriculture, Research Note NC-180.

McEwan A, Brink M, Spinelli R (2017). Factors affecting the productivity and work quality of chain flail delimbing and debarking. Silva Fennica 51:2. https://doi. org/10.14214/sf.1599.

Moore GA (1987) The variation of bark/wood bond strength with moisture content of P. radiata and three eucalypt species during storage. Aust. For. Res 17: 73-8.

Morán J, Alvarez V, Cyras V, Vázquez A (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15:149-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9.

Nurmi J, Lehtimäki J (2011) Debarking and drying of downy birch (Betula pubescens) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) fuelwood in conjunction with multi-tree harvesting. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(8): 3376–3382. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.065

Oman M (2000) Influence of log characteristics on drum debarking of pulpwood. Scand. J. For. Res 15: 455-463.

Parker CC, Parker ML, Smith AC, Waldron KW (2001) Pectin distribution at the surface of potato parenchyma cells in relation to cell-cell adhesion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49(9): 4364-4371.

Prislan P, Schmitt U, Koch G, Gričar J, Čufar K (2011) Seasonal ultrastructural changes in the cambial zone of beech (Fagus Sylvatica) grown at two different altitudes. IAWA Journal, 32(4): 443–459.

Ratto M, Kantelinen A, Bailey M, Viikari L (1993) Potential of enzymes for wood debarking. Tappi Journal 76: 2. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/bioenergy/pdfs/final_billionton_vision_report2.pdf

Rowell R (1984) The chemistry of solid wood. Doi.org// 10.1021/ba-1984-0207

Salmen L (2004) Micromechanical understanding of cell-wall structure. C. R. Biologies 327: 873-880.

Shafayet ZM, Yi H, Puri V (2017) A multiscale FEA framework for bridging cell-wall to tissue-scale mechanical properties: the contributions of middle lamella interface and cell shape. J Mater Sci 52: 7947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0999-4

Senelwa K and Sims REH (1999) Fuel characteristics of short rotation forest biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy 17: 127–140. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00035-5

Serapiglia, MJ, Cameron KD, Stipanovic AJ, Smart LB (2009) Analysis of biomass composition using high-resolution thermogravimetric analysis and percent bark content for the selection of shrub willow bioenergy crop varieties. Bioenerg. Res. 2:1-9

Shara M and Stohs SJ (2015) Efficacy and safety of white willow bark (salix alba) extracts. Phytother Res 29: 1112-1116.

Silva RV and Ueki, M. M. (2010) Thermal, mechanical, and hygroscopic behavior of sisal fiber/ polyurethane resin-based composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 29: No.9.

Somerville C, Bauer S, Brininstool G, Facette M, Hamann T, Milne J, Osborne E, Paredez A, Persson S, Raab T, Vorwerk S, Youngs H (2004) Toward a Systems Approach to Understanding Plant Cell Walls. Science 306: 2206-2211.

Sturos J and Erickson J (1977) Proposed systems to remove bark and foliage from whole tree chips. ASAE: 74-1513.

Tharakan PJ, Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, White EH. (2003) Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age. Biomass and Bioenergy 25(6): 571–580. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00054-0

Thompson MA, Sturos JA (1991) Performance of the portable

chain flail delimber/debarker processing northern

hardwoods. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,

North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul,

MN.

Thornber JP and Notrhcote DH (1961) Changes in the chemical composition of a cambial cell during its differentiation into xylem and phloem tissue in trees. Biochemical Journal 81(3): 449–455.

Vilkovsky P, Cunderlik I, Rachko V (2016) The shear strength on the wood/bark border of sessile oak. Chip and Chipless Woodworking Processes 10(1): 193-201.

Vilkovsky P, Cunderlik I (2017) Structure of phloem and wood/bark shear strength of the sessile oak during dormant and growing period. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen 59(1): 17−26.

Villareal MO, Hernandez EA, Arispuro IV and Tellez MAM. (2012) Plant cell wall polymers: Function, structure, and biological activity of their derivatives. Polymerization. Chapter 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/46094.

Vogler H, Felekis D, Nelson B, Grossniklaus U (2015) Measuring the mechanical properties of plant cell walls. Plants 4: 167-182. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants4020167.

Voragen AGJ, Coenen GJ, Verhoef RP, Schols HA (2009) Pectin, a versatile polysaccharide present in plant cell walls. Struct Chem 20: 263-275. https: doi10.1007/s11224-009-9442-z

Watson WF, Twaddle AA, Hudson JB (1993) Review of chain flail delimbing-debarking. Journal of forest engineering 4:2.

White PB, Wang T, Park YB, Cosgrove DJ, Hong M (2014) Water-polysaccharides interactions in the primary cell wall of Arabidopsis thaliana from polarization transfer solid-state NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136: 10399-10409.

Wiaderek I and Waliszewska B (2010) Selected mechanical properties of one-year old twigs of Salix acutifolia. Forestry and Wood Technology 72:427-432.

Willats W, Orfila C, Limberg G, Christian BH, Van AG, Voragen A, Marcus S, Mie CT, Mikkelsen J, Murray B, Paul K J, Knox P (2001) Modulation of the degree and pattern of methyl-esterification of pectic homogalacturonan in plant cell walls: implications for pectin methyl esterase action, matrix properties and cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 276 (22):19404-13.

Xiao C and Anderson CT (2013) Roles of pectin in biomass yield and processing for biofuels. Frontiers in Plant Science. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00067.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.