Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access


Thomas L. Eberhardt, Chi-Leung So, Daniel J. Leduc


Established illustrations of juvenile wood in pines depict a central core of wood, varying little by diameter or cambial age, to be nested within mature wood tapering to the upper portion of the stem; alternative illustrations show greater complexity in attributing variability within this central core of wood to its proximity to the crown and/or the maturity of the tree when the wood was formed. The present study addresses the degree to which different representations of juvenile wood are applicable to a sampling of 70-yr-old longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) trees. Wood property maps were derived from X-ray densitometry data gathered from tree disks taken at every 61 cm along each tree bole. Unique to the wood property maps herein is that the two cardinal directions of the data (north and south) were preserved, thus providing true full-stem profiles. Compared with maps reported for younger southern pines, the central core of low-density wood extending the length of the tree boles was noticeably wider at the midheight than at the lower and higher relative heights. Another difference was that the higher ring specific gravity (SG) values, particularly at the lower heights, did not extend all the way to the wood closest to the bark. Narrower ring width and higher ring SG values above the 3Q height, normally being wood features associated with higher wood quality, can be attributed to the maturity of the study trees. Altogether, the wood property maps and data comparisons were consistent with an alternative juvenile wood illustration proposing that all the wood at the base of the tree, comprised of juvenile corewood and juvenile outerwood, as being different from the majority of the tree wood, upward from a one-quarter relative height.


corewood, juvenile wood, mature wood, Pinus palustris, wood property maps, wood quality

Full Text:



Amarasekara H, Denne MP (2002) Effects of crown size on wood characteristics of Corsican pine in relation to definitions of juvenile wood, crown formed wood, and core wood. Forestry 75(1):51-61.

Antony F, Schimleck LR, Daniels RF (2012) A comparison of the earlywood-latewood demarcation methods—A case study in loblolly pine. IAWA J 33(2):187-195.

Antony F, Schimleck LR, Daniels RF, Clark A III, Borders BE, Kane MB, Burkhart HE (2015) Whole-tree bark and wood properties of loblolly pine from intensively managed plantations. For Sci 61(1):55-66.

Auty D, Achim A, Macdonald E, Cameron AD, Gardiner BA (2014) Models for predicting wood density variation in Scots pine. Forestry 87:449-458.

Baldwin VC Jr., Peterson KD, Clark A III, Ferguson RB, Strub MR, Bower DR (2000) The effects of spacing and thinning on stand and tree characteristics of 38-year-old loblolly pine. For Ecol Manag 137:91-102.

Burdon RD, Kibblewhite RP, Walker JCF, Megraw RA, Evans R, Cown DR (2004) Juvenile versus mature wood: A new concept, orthogonal to corewood versus outerwood, with special reference to Pinus radiata and Pinus taeda. For Sci 50(4):399-415.

Butler MA, Dahlen J, Daniels RF, Eberhardt TL, Antony F (2016) Bending strength and stiffness of loblolly pine lumber from intensively managed stands located on the Georgia Lower Coastal Plain. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 74:91-100.

Clark A III, Daniels RF, Jordan L (2006) Juvenile/mature wood transition in loblolly pine as defined by annual ring specific gravity, proportion of latewood, and microfibril angle. Wood Fiber Sci 38(2):292-299.

Clark A III, Saucier JR (1989) Influence of initial planting density, geographic location, and species on juvenile wood formation in southern pine. For Prod J 39(7/8):42-48.

Dahlen J, Montes C, Eberhardt TL, Auty D (2018) Probability models that relate nondestructive test methods to lumber design values of plantation loblolly pine. Forestry 91:295-306.

Day ME, Greenwood MS, Diaz-Sala C (2002) Age- and size related trends in woody plant shoot development: Regulatory pathways and evidence for genetic control. Tree Physiol 22:507-513.

Downes GM, Drew D, Battaglia M, Schulze D (2009) Measuring and modelling stem growth and wood formation: An overview. Dendrochronologia 27:147-157.

Eberhardt TL, Samuelson LJ (2015) Collection of wood quality data by X-ray densitometry: A case study with three southern pines. Wood Sci Technol 49:739-753.

Eberhardt TL, So C-L, Leduc DJ (2018) Wood variability in mature longleaf pine: Differences related to cardinal direction for a softwood in a humid subtropical climate. Wood Fiber Sci 50(3):323-336.

Fernow BE (1896) Southern pine mechanical and physical properties. US Department of Agriculture, Division of Forestry, Washington, DC, Circular No. 12. 19 pp.

Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J For 105(7):337-347.

Franceschini T, Bontemps J-D, Leban J-M (2012) Transient historical decrease in earlywood and latewood density and unstable sensitivity to summer temperature for Norway spruce in northeastern France. Can J Res 42:219-226.

Franceschini T, Longuetaud F, Bontemps J-D, Bouriaud O, Caritey B-D, Leban J-M (2013) Effect of ring width, cambial age, and climatic variables on the within-ring wood density profile of Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. Trees (Berl) 27:913-925.

Groom L, Mott L, Shaler S (2002a) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part I. Determination and variability of stress-strain curves with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood Fiber Sci 34(1):14-27.

Groom L, Shaler S, Mott L (2002b) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part III. Global relationships between fiber properties and fiber location within an individual tree. Wood Fiber Sci 34(2):238-250.

Harder RL, Desmarais RN (1972) Interpolation using surface splines. J Aircr 9:189-191.

Jordan L, Clark A III, Schimleck LR, Hall DB, Daniels RF (2008) Regional variation in wood specific gravity of planted loblolly pine in the United States. Can J Res 38:698-710.

Kibblewhite RP (1999) Designer fibres for improved papers through exploiting genetic variation in wood microstructure. Appita J 52(6):429-435.

Kojima M, Yamamoto H, Yoshida M, Ojio Y, Okumura K (2009) Maturation property of fast-growing hardwood plantation species: A view of fiber length. For Ecol Manag 257:15-22.

Koubaa A, Zhang SYT, Makni S (2002) Defining the transition from earlywood to latewood in black spruce based on intra-ring wood density profiles from X-ray densitometry. Ann For Sci 59:511-518.

Lachenbruch B, Moore JR, Evans R (2011) Radial variation in wood structure and function in woody plants, and hypotheses for its occurrence. Pages 121-164 in FC Meinzer,

B Lachenbruch, TE Dawson, eds. Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

Landers JL, Van Lear DH, Boyer WD (1995) The longleaf pine forests of the southeast: Requiem or renaissance. J For 93(11):39-44.

Larson PR, Kretschmann DE, Clark A III, Isebrands JG (2001) Formation and properties of juvenile wood in the southern pines: A synopsis. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-129 USDA Forest Service, Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 42 pp.

Longuetaud F, Mothe F, Fournier M, Dlouha J, Santenoise P, Deleuze C (2016) Within-stem maps of wood density and water content for characterization of species: A case study on three hardwood and two softwood species. Ann For Sci 73:601-614.

Lukasek J, Zeidler A, Barcik S (2012) Shrinkage of grand fir wood and its variability within the stem. Drv Ind 63(2):121-128.

McIntyre RK, Guldin JM, Ettel T, Ware C, Jones K (2018) Restoration of longleaf pine in the southern United States: A status report. Pages 297-302 in JE Kirschman, compiler. Proc. 19th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, 14-16 March 2017, Blacksburg, VA. E-Gen Tech Rep SRS-234 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.

McKeand S, Mullin T, Byram T, White T (2003) Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south. J For 101(3):32-37.

Meinguet J (1979) Multivariate interpolation at arbitrary points made simple. Z Angew Math Phys 30:292-304.

Moore JR, Cown DJ (2017) Corewood (juvenile wood) and its impacts on wood utilization. Curr For Rep 3:107-118.

Mora CR, Schimleck LR (2009) Determination of within-tree variation of Pinus taeda wood properties by near infrared spectroscopy. Part 2: Whole-tree wood property maps. Appita J 62(3):232-238.

Mott L, Groom L, Shaler S (2002) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part II. Comparison of earlywood and latewood fibers with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood Fiber Sci 34(2):221-237.

Ohshima J, Yokota S, Yoshizawa N, Ona T (2005) Representative heights for assessing whole-tree values and the within-tree variations of derived wood properties in Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. globulus. Wood Fiber Sci 37(1):51-65.

Olesen PO (1973) The influence of the compass direction on the basic density of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) and its importance for sampling for estimating the genetic value of plus trees. Forest Tree Improvement 6. Akademisk Forlag, Hørsholm Arboretet, Denmark. 58 pp.

Reinsch CH (1967) Smoothing by spline functions. Numer Math 10:177–183.

Samuelson LJ, Eberhardt TL, Bartkowiak SM, Johnsen KH (2013) Relationships between climate, radial growth and wood properties of mature loblolly pine in Hawaii and a northern and southern site in the southeastern United States. For Ecol Manag 310:786-795.

SAS Institute Inc (1990) SAS/GRAPH software: Reference, Version 6, 1st edition, Vol. 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 664 pp.

Schimleck L, Antony F, Dahlen J, Moore J (2018a) Wood and fiber quality of plantation-grown conifers: A summary of research with an emphasis on loblolly and radiata pine. Forests 9:298.

Schimleck L, Antony F, Mora C, Dahlen J (2018b) Comparison of whole-tree wood property maps for 13- and 22-year-old loblolly pine. Forests 9:287.

So C-L, Eberhardt TL, Leduc DJ (2018) Within-tree variability in wood quality parameters for mature longleaf pine. Pages 436-442 in E Kirschman, compiler. Proc. 19th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, 14-16 March 2017, Blacksburg, VA. E-Gen Tech Rep SRS-234 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.

So C-L, Groom LH, Rials TG, Snell R, Kelley SS, Meglen R (2002) Rapid assessment of the fundamental property variation of wood. Pages 176-180 in KWOutcalt, ed. Proc. 11th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, 20-22 March 2001, Knoxville, TN. Gen Tech Rep SRS-48 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.

South DB, Harper RA (2016) A decline in timberland continues for several southern yellow pines. J For 114(2):116-124.

Spurr SH, Hsiung W-Y (1954) Growth rate and specific gravity in conifers. J For 52(3):191-200.

Tanabe J, Ishiguri F, Nakayama M, Ohshima J, Iizuka K, Yokota S (2016) Properties of juvenile and mature wood and their effects on the bending properties of lumber in Pinus taeda growing in Tochigi, Japan. For Prod J 66(7/8):428-432.

Tasissa G, Burkhart HE (1998) Modeling thinning effects on ring specific gravity of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). For Sci 44(2):212-223.

Trendelenburg R (1935) Schwankungen des raumgewichts wichtiger nadelh¨olzer nach wuchsgebiet, standort und einzelstamm. Z Ver Dtsch Ing 79(4):85-89 [in German].

Zeidler A, ˇSedivka P (2015) Influence of selected factors on wood density variability in grand fir (Abies grandis/ Douglas/Lindl.). Wood Res 60(1):33-44.

Zobel BJ, Sprague JR (1998) Juvenile wood in forest trees Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 300 pp.

Zobel BJ, van Buijtenen JP (1989) Wood variation: Its causesand control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 363 pp.


  • There are currently no refbacks.