MASS TIMBER CONSTRUCTION IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND—STATUS, AND ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON ADOPTION

Authors

  • David Craig Evison University of Canterbury http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-0637
  • Paul D Kremer Head of Sales and Marketing XLAM Pty Melbourne
  • Jason Guiver Project Development Manager Nelson Pine Industries Ltd Nelson

Keywords:

Mass timber construction, non-residential buildings, pre-fabrication, design,

Abstract

Mass timber construction in Australia and New Zealand uses three main materials—laminated veneer lumber, glue laminated timber and cross-laminated timber (CLT). This article focuses on the use of mass timber in nonresidential construction—the use in single-family homes and apartments is not considered. In Australia and New Zealand, mass timber building technology has moved from being technologically possible to being a feasible alternative to reinforced concrete and steel construction. It has not taken over a large market share in either market and, as such, has not been a disruptive technology. The major changes in this market in the past 5-10 yr in Australia and New Zealand have been the development of new industrial capacity in CLT and the acquisition of computer controlled machining equipment to facilitate prefabrication of wooden building components. The development of new codes and standards and design guides is underway. The drivers of future growth in market share are expected to include more clients putting a higher weight on the various environmental benefits of building in wood, reduction in the real and perceived professional risk for builders and architects specifying mass timber construction, and fuller participation in the supply chain for timber buildings (from design to construction) by timber building specialists. Government policies to encourage the use of timber may also be helpful. Engineers and architects will continue to learn—through experience—how to optimize building construction methods to take advantage of the specific features and qualities of timber as a construction method.

 

 

Author Biography

David Craig Evison, University of Canterbury

School of Forestry

Associate Professor

References

Buchanan AH, John S, Love S (2012) LCA and carbon

footprint of multi-storey timber buildings compared with

steel and concrete buildings. Proc. World Conference on

Timber Engineering, July 16-19, Auckland, New Zealand.

Quenneville P. (ed.). pages 92-100, New Zealand Timber

Design Society, New Zealand.

Bruneau M, MacRae G (2017) Reconstructing Christchurch:

A seismic shift in building structural systems. The Quake

Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.

Depro BM, Murray BC, Alig RJ, Shanks A (2008) Public

land, timber harvests, and climate mitigation: Quantifying

carbon sequestration potential on U.S. public timberlands.

For Ecol Mgmt 255(3):1122-1134.

Dunn A (2015) Final report for commercial building costing

cases studies: Traditional design versus timber project.

Report no. PNA308-1213. Forest and Wood Products

Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

Evison D (2015) Survey of key decision-makers involved in

the construction of multi-storey timber buildings in Christchurch during 2013 and 2014. Timber Design Journal 22(4):15-22.

Forestry Innovation Investment and Binational Softwood

Lumber Council (2014) Survey of international tall wood

buildings. http://www.rethinkwood.com/sites/default/files/

wood-resource-pdf/Survey%20Tall%20Wood_REPORT%

WITHOUT%20APPENDICIES_web.pdf (15 August

.

Kremer PD, Symmons MA (2015) Mass timber construction

as an alternative to concrete and steel in the Australia

building industry: A PESTEL evaluation of the potential.

Int Wood Prod J 6(3):138-147.

Kremer PD, Symmons MA (2016) Overcoming psychological

barriers to widespread acceptance of mass timber

construction in Australia. Report no. PNA309-1213. Forest

& Wood Products Australia Limited, Melbourne, Australia.

Lehmann S, Fitzgerald GB (2012) Sustainable urban infill

development using low-carbon prefabricated timber construction systems: Wood in the city. Sustainability 4:

-2742.

McGregor RM, Evison D, Ozanne L (2011) A pilot survey of

structural engineers’ perceptions of laminated veneer

lumber in single-storey industrial buildings. SESOC

Journal 24(1):25-28.

Ministry for the Environment (2016a) New Zealand’s

greenhouse gas inventory, 1990-2014. Fulfilling reporting

requirements under the United Nations framework convention

on climate change and the Kyoto protocol. New

Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand.

Ministry for the Environment (2016b) The New Zealand

emissions trading. New Zealand Government, Wellington,

New Zealand. Page I (2007) Timber structural use potential in nonresidential buildings. BRANZ Report E465. BRANZ Ltd, Porirua City, New Zealand.

Rotorua Lakes Council (2015) Wood first policy. http://www.

rotorualakescouncil.nz/our-council/PoliciesandBylaws/

Policies/Pages/default.aspx (21 May 2018).

Taggart J (2011) Toward a culture of wood architecture.

Abacus editions, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Wood Solutions (2013) Why wood? Strength performance.

http://www.woodsolutions.com.au/Articles/Why-Wood/

product-performance-strength (30 June 2015).

Yates M, Linegar M, Dujic B (2008) Design of an 8 storey

residential tower from KLH cross laminated solid timber

panels. http://www.ewpa.com/Archive/2008/june/Paper_

pdf (24 May 2015).

Downloads

Published

2018-08-16

Issue

Section

Research Contributions