MASS TIMBER CONSTRUCTION IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND—STATUS, AND ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON ADOPTION
Keywords:Mass timber construction, non-residential buildings, pre-fabrication, design,
Mass timber construction in Australia and New Zealand uses three main materials—laminated veneer lumber, glue laminated timber and cross-laminated timber (CLT). This article focuses on the use of mass timber in nonresidential construction—the use in single-family homes and apartments is not considered. In Australia and New Zealand, mass timber building technology has moved from being technologically possible to being a feasible alternative to reinforced concrete and steel construction. It has not taken over a large market share in either market and, as such, has not been a disruptive technology. The major changes in this market in the past 5-10 yr in Australia and New Zealand have been the development of new industrial capacity in CLT and the acquisition of computer controlled machining equipment to facilitate prefabrication of wooden building components. The development of new codes and standards and design guides is underway. The drivers of future growth in market share are expected to include more clients putting a higher weight on the various environmental benefits of building in wood, reduction in the real and perceived professional risk for builders and architects specifying mass timber construction, and fuller participation in the supply chain for timber buildings (from design to construction) by timber building specialists. Government policies to encourage the use of timber may also be helpful. Engineers and architects will continue to learn—through experience—how to optimize building construction methods to take advantage of the specific features and qualities of timber as a construction method.
Buchanan AH, John S, Love S (2012) LCA and carbon
footprint of multi-storey timber buildings compared with
steel and concrete buildings. Proc. World Conference on
Timber Engineering, July 16-19, Auckland, New Zealand.
Quenneville P. (ed.). pages 92-100, New Zealand Timber
Design Society, New Zealand.
Bruneau M, MacRae G (2017) Reconstructing Christchurch:
A seismic shift in building structural systems. The Quake
Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
Depro BM, Murray BC, Alig RJ, Shanks A (2008) Public
land, timber harvests, and climate mitigation: Quantifying
carbon sequestration potential on U.S. public timberlands.
For Ecol Mgmt 255(3):1122-1134.
Dunn A (2015) Final report for commercial building costing
cases studies: Traditional design versus timber project.
Report no. PNA308-1213. Forest and Wood Products
Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Evison D (2015) Survey of key decision-makers involved in
the construction of multi-storey timber buildings in Christchurch during 2013 and 2014. Timber Design Journal 22(4):15-22.
Forestry Innovation Investment and Binational Softwood
Lumber Council (2014) Survey of international tall wood
WITHOUT%20APPENDICIES_web.pdf (15 August
Kremer PD, Symmons MA (2015) Mass timber construction
as an alternative to concrete and steel in the Australia
building industry: A PESTEL evaluation of the potential.
Int Wood Prod J 6(3):138-147.
Kremer PD, Symmons MA (2016) Overcoming psychological
barriers to widespread acceptance of mass timber
construction in Australia. Report no. PNA309-1213. Forest
& Wood Products Australia Limited, Melbourne, Australia.
Lehmann S, Fitzgerald GB (2012) Sustainable urban infill
development using low-carbon prefabricated timber construction systems: Wood in the city. Sustainability 4:
McGregor RM, Evison D, Ozanne L (2011) A pilot survey of
structural engineers’ perceptions of laminated veneer
lumber in single-storey industrial buildings. SESOC
Ministry for the Environment (2016a) New Zealand’s
greenhouse gas inventory, 1990-2014. Fulfilling reporting
requirements under the United Nations framework convention
on climate change and the Kyoto protocol. New
Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand.
Ministry for the Environment (2016b) The New Zealand
emissions trading. New Zealand Government, Wellington,
New Zealand. Page I (2007) Timber structural use potential in nonresidential buildings. BRANZ Report E465. BRANZ Ltd, Porirua City, New Zealand.
Rotorua Lakes Council (2015) Wood first policy. http://www.
Policies/Pages/default.aspx (21 May 2018).
Taggart J (2011) Toward a culture of wood architecture.
Abacus editions, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Wood Solutions (2013) Why wood? Strength performance.
product-performance-strength (30 June 2015).
Yates M, Linegar M, Dujic B (2008) Design of an 8 storey
residential tower from KLH cross laminated solid timber
pdf (24 May 2015).
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.