Perceptions Of New And Established Waterfront Materials By U.S. Marine Decision Makers
Keywords:Decking, piling, perceptions, product/market development, end-users, specifiers, marinas, marina dock systems, composites
AbstractA demand exists for strong, cost-effective, durable, and environmentally benign building materials for weather-exposed marina applications. In particular, the findings from a nationwide survey of decision makers at U.S. marinas indicate a need for waterfront materials and products with superior performance capabilities having a combination of "ideal" attributes that may not be currently available in the marketplace. This study examines the perceptions of decision makers at both large and small U.S. marinas and fixed versus floating dock systems regarding new and established waterfront materials in decking and piling applications. The findings from the survey indicate the most important decking material attribute for U.S. marinas was resistance to decay, followed by reliable strength, and low maintenance cost. The most important piling material attribute was also resistance to decay followed by reliable strength and resistance to impact. The least important attribute for both decking and piling was use of recycled materials. Material performance comparisons generally indicated a strong preference for composite decking and steel piling. In terms of cost, wood was perceived as the best (lowest cost); composites were perceived as the worst (highest cost). Knowledge ratings of composite products and the receptivity to new technologies indicated that marina respondents perceived themselves moderately knowledgeable of composite materials and moderately receptive to the adoption of new technologies.
Aaker, D. A., And J. G. Shansby. 1982. Positioning your product. Bus. Horizons. 25(3):56-72.nAnonymous. 1996. On the waterfront, plastic makes inroads. Engineering News Record. Apr. 8. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY.nAnonymous. 1999a. Trex Company, Inc. Prospectus for common stock. Issues by Schroder & Company Inc., and J. C. Bradford & Company, New York, NY (9 March).nAnonymous. 1999b. Composites find more support in keeping up piers and bridges. Engineering News Record. Jun. 7. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY.nAnonymous. 2000. Engineered wood composites for naval waterfront facilities: Problem statement. 2000. http://wme132.respark.wsu.edu/problemstatement.html'>wme132.respark.wsu.edu/problemstatement.htmlnAnonymous. 2001. NMMA mission & structure, http://www.nmma.org/mission.html'>www.nmma.org/mission.htmlnArndt, J. 1967. Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J. Marketing Res. 4: 291-295.nAshley, S. 1996. Bridging the cost gap with composites. Mech. Eng. 118(2):76-80.nBallenger, J., And S. McCune. 1990. A procedure for determining sample size for multiple population parameter studies. J. Marketing Ed. 12(3):30-33.nBaptista. J. 1999. The diffusion of process innovations: A selective review. Int. J. Economics Bus. 6(1):107-129.nBass, F. 1969. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science 15 (January):215-27.nBlack, T. 1998. Salvaging our failing infrastructure: A public works challenge. American City & County 113(10):64-79.nBlankenship, A. B., And G. Breen. 1992. State of the art of marketing research. NTC Publishing Group, Chicago, IL.nBusch, P. S., And M. J. Houston. 1985. Marketing: Strategic foundations. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.nCahill, D. 1994. The marketing concept and new hightech products: Is there a fit? J. Product Innovation Mgmt. 11(4):336-343.nCofer, W., K. Fridley, And D. McLean. 1998. Structural design and analysis progress report first quarter 1998. Washington State University, Pullman WA.nCraigie, Larry. 2000. Personal Communication. Composites Fabricators Association. Arlington. VA. July 28.nCrawford, D., R. Degroot, J. Watkings, And H. Greaves. 2000. Treatability of U.S. wood species with pigment-emulsified creosote. Forest Prod. J. (50)29-35.nDillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. NY.nEagar, T. 1995. Bringing new materials to market. Technology Review 98(2):42-50.nEastin. I., S. Shook, And D. Simon. 1999. Softwood lumber substitution in the U.S. residential construction industry in 1994. Forest Prod. J. 49(5):21-27.nEaton, R. A., And M. D. C. Hale. 1993. Wood: Decay, pests and protection. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.nFell, D., And E. Hansen. 1999. Target engineered products to builders most likely to innovate. Wood Technol. 126(4):22-25.nFelton, C., And R. Degroot. 1996. The recycling potential of preservative treated wood. Forest Prod. J. (46)7/8:37-47.nGaythwaite, J. 1990. Design of marine facilities for the berthing, mooring, and repair of vessels. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.nGronross, J., And J. Bowyer. 1999. Assessment of the market potential for environmentally certified wood products in new homes in Minneapolis/St. Paul and Chicago. Forest Prod. J. 49(6):28-34.nHansen, E., And J. Morrell. 1997. Use of anti-stain chemical treatments by western U.S. softwood lumber industry. Forest Prod. J. 47(6):69-73.nHansen, L. 2000. More Mega-yachts afloat due to rising economic waters. Virginian Pilot, Norfolk, VA. July 24. B6.nHastak, M., And D. Halpin. 2000. Assessment of lifecycle benefit-cost of composites in construction. J. Composites for Construction 4(3): 103-111.nHenriksen, M. 2000. CFA announces polyester sales to the U.S. fiber-reinforced composites market up 4.9% for 1999. Arlington. VA. http://www.cfa-hq.org/pr061500b.htm. (13 Oct. 2000).nHerszenhorn, D. 1999. Pest is eating at city's edge: A cleaner harbor gives new life to marine borers. New York Times, NY, July 28. B1.nHoffard, T., And D. Pendleton. 1998. SP-2042-SHR. Navy wood survey summary. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, June, Port Hueneme, CA.nHudson, B. 1999. Personal Communication. Sales Representative for Seaward International Inc., Clearbrook, VA. April 16.nInternational Marina Institute (IMI). 1998. Financial and operational benchmark study for marina operators. Report prepared by: Moss Adams Advisory Services, Seattle, WA, Report published by IMI, Nokomis, FL.nKennedy, R. 1999. A man with a fish's-eye view of the city. New York Times, NY, Feb. 26. B2.nKerber, D. 1999. Personal Communication. Sales Representative for Schuyler Rubber Co./SSR Marine Fenders, Woodinville, WA. April 16.nKnights, M. 1996. Plastic lumber: Ready for prime time. Plastics Technology 42(8):34-39.nKoebel, T. 1999. Sustaining sustainability: Innovation in housing and built environment. J. Urban Technol. 6(3): 75-94.nKotler, P., And G. Armstrong. 1996. Principles of marketing, 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.nKrasner, J. 1998. What's eating Boston harbor? Worm returns. Wall Street Journal, NY, Sept. 23. NE2.nLancaster Composites Inc. Columbia, PA. (not dated). Brochure: Composite Post 40: Marine Piling & Structurals.nLenard. J. 1999. Personal Communication. Association Director of Marine Operators Association of America, Washington, DC. August 27.nLewis, R. 1999. Personal Communication. Sales Representative for Schrader Co., Plastic Pilings Inc., Burlington, WA. April 16.nMahajan, V., E. Muller, And F. Bass. 1990. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and direction for research. J. Marketing. 54 (January): 1-26.nMalvar, L. J., T. A. Hoffard, D. E. Pendleton, And D. E. Hoy. 1998. SP-2035-SHR: Description and requirements for candidate waterfront engineered wood materials and components. March. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA.nMarch, F., And M. Colturi. 1998. Ports '98: Market advancement for composite marine piling and timber. ASCE. Long Beach, CA. Pp. 824-829.nMarch, F., And W. Jarvis. 1997. Application of large wood-fiber-plastic composites for marine structures. The Fourth International Conference on Woodfiber-Plastic Composites. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI.nMitropoulos, P., And C. B. Tatum. 1999. Technology adoption decisions in construction organizations. Journal of Construction Eng. Mgmt. 125(5):330-338.nMitropoulos, P., And C. B. Tatum. 2000. Forces driving adoption of new information technologies. J. Construction Eng. Mgmt. 126(5):340-348.nMottram, B. 2000. Big boats—Trendy, spendy boaters typically buying larger crafts despite rising costs. The News Tribune, Tacoma, WA. March 29. C4.nNahb Research Center. 2000. New building materials. http://wwwnahbrc.org/'>wwwnahbrc.org/nNational Marine Manufacturers Association. (NMMA). 1999. National Marina Directory 1999. Sourcemark Services, Inc., 150 North Wacker Drive, Suite 1345. Chicago, IL, Excel version.nOzanne, L., And P. Smith. 1995. Measuring the market opening for certified forest products. J. Woodworkers, Alliance for Rainforest Protection. 5(4): 1-2.nOzanne, L., And R. Vlosky. 1997. Willingness to pay for environmentally certified wood products: A consumer perspective. Forest Prod. J. 47(6):39-47.nPearl, D., And D. Fairley. 1985. Testing for the potential for non-response bias in sample surveys. University of Chicago Press. Public Opinion Quart. 49(4):553-560.nPendleton, D., And T. Hoffard. 1998. SP-2040-SHR. Management of treated wood removed from waterfront service options and costs for Navy activities. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, June, Port Hueneme, CA.nPetra, J. 1999. Personal Communication. Director of Statistical Department of National Marine Manufacturers Association. Chicago, IL. August 20.nPetra, J. 2000. 1999 US recreational boat registration statistics. http://www.nmma.org/statistics.html'>www.nmma.org/statistics.html.nPhair, M. 1997. Composite piles gaining ground. Engineering News Record. Jan. 6. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY.nPianka, R. 1999. Personal Communication. Sales Representative of Lancaster Composites Inc., Columbia, PA. March 12.nRasmussen, E. 1997. Fathoming the strength of structures. Civil Engineering 67(7):58-59.nRoberts, J. 2000. Developing new rules for new markets. Academy of Marketing Sci. 28(1):31-44.nRobinson, H. 1999. Personal Communication. Sales Representative for Galva-Foam Marine Industries, Camdenton, Missouri. August 16.nRogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed. The Free Press, New York, NY.nRohde, D. 1998. Burrowing crustaceans cause closing of pier. New York Times, NY, Apr. 28. B3.nRosenberg, N., P. Ince, K. Skog, And A. Plantinga. 1990. Understanding the adoption of new technology in the forest products industry. Forest Prod. J. 40(10): 15-22.nSchuyler Rubber Co. Woodinville, WA (not dated). Brochure: Marine fenders offshore and dockside.nScola, P. T. 1989. U.S. Navy underwater inspection of waterfront facilities. Pages 16-34 in Proc. Ports' 89. ASCE, New York, NY.nSeaward International, Inc. Clearbrook, VA. (not dated). Brochure: Seapile, Seatimber, Seacamel: Composite marine piling, timber, and camel.nShook, S. 1999. Forecasting adoption and substitution of successive generations of structural wood panel products in the United States. Forest Science 45(2):232-248.nSmith, P., And R. Vlosky. 1997. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): Implementation Strategies in the Forest Products Industries. In Conference Proc. Logistics—for the Forest Industy, Rotorua, New Zealand, November 1997.nSmith, P., And K. D. Bright. 2001. Perceptions of new and established waterfront materials. Wood Fiber Sci. (In Press).nSmith, R. L., R. Bush, And S. Bowe. 1999. A perceptional investigation into the adoption of timber bridges: A national comparative study. Wood Fiber Sci. 31(2):204-216.nSmith, R. L., W. Spradlin, D. Alderman, Jr., And E. Cesa. 2000a. A perceptional comparison of wood in separate infrastructure markets. Wood Fiber Sci. 32(2):239-255.nSmith, R. L., W. Spradlin, D. Alderman, Jr., And E. Cesa. 2000b. Perceptions of wood in the highway infrastructure market. Forest Prod. J. 50(6):23-31.nTanal, V., And A. Matlin. 1996. Marine borers are back. Civil Engineering 66(10):71-76.nTobiasson, B., And R. Kollmeyer. 1991. Marinas and small craft harbors. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.nToensmeier, P. 1994. Composites industry eyes civil engineering as next big market. Modern Plastics 71(4): 18-19.nTrinka, M., S. Sinclair, And T. Marcin. 1992. Determinant attribute analysis: A tool for new product development. Wood Fiber Sci. 24(4):385-391.nTroutman, D. 1998. Ports '98: High-strength fiber reinforced polymer composites offer new significance to marine pier design, vol. 2. ASCE, Long Beach, CA.nTsinker, G. 1995. Marinas. Pages 413-502 in Marine structures engineering: Specialized applications. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.nTsinker, G. 1997. Handbook of port and harbor engineering. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.nUnited States Port Development Expenditure Report. 2000. U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration: Office of Ports and Domestic Shipping. Dec. Washington. DC.nU.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. The biological and economic assessment of pentachlorophenol inorganic arsenicals and creosote, vol 1. Wood Preserv. Tech. Bull. 1658-1. Cooperative Impact Assessment Rept. USDA. Washington D.C.nVlosky, R., P. Smith, and D. Wilson. 1994. Electronic data interchange implementation strategies: A case study. J. Business Ind. Marketing 9(4):5-18.nWakefield, S. 2001. Personal Communication. Manager of Marketing and Member Services for Marine Operators Association of America, Washington, DC. January 9.nWestrup, H. 1992. Patching the nation's crumbling highways. Current Science 77(14):6-7.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.