Life-Cycle impacts of Inland Northwest and Northeast/North central forest resources

Authors

  • Elaine E. Oneil
  • Leonard R. Johnson
  • Bruce R. Lippke
  • James B. McCarter
  • Marc E. McDill
  • Paul A. Roth
  • James C. Finley

Keywords:

Inland Northwest, LCI, LCA, fire risk reduction, forest, wood products, forest carbon

Abstract

Determining the life-cycle inventory (LCI) and impact of forest harvest, regeneration, and growth is necessary in conducting a life-cycle assessment of wood products. This publication provides quantitative assessments of the economic and environmental impacts of forest management activities covering portions of the Inland Northwest (INW), including Montana, Idaho, and eastern Washington, and of the Northeastern and North Central (NE/NC) forests from Minnesota to Maine and south as far as Missouri, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. The management scenarios provide the inputs needed to develop an LCI on all the inputs and outputs for wood products as impacted by forest treatments and the harvesting of logs in the region. Productive timberlands were grouped according to forest type, productivity, management intensity, and ownership into three broad forest types in the west: cold, dry, and moist; and four in the east: spruce/fir, northern hardwoods, oak/hickory, and aspen/birch. Spruce/fir represented the feedstock to softwood lumber and a composite of northern hardwoods and oak/hickory the feedstock to hardwood lumber. Simulations used the US Forest Service Forest Vegetation Simulator to estimate standing and harvested biomass and log volumes passed on as resources to the manufacturing segments for lumber, plywood, or oriented strandboard. The combinations of ownership, management intensity, and forest type were stratified and averaged to produce a single estimate of yield and the corresponding harvesting impacts. Both historic harvest rates and increased management intensity scenarios were simulated for each region. In the INW, the shift to the higher intensity scenario increased the average production of merchantable volume at harvest to 249 - 399 m3/ha when averaged across the forested land in each ownership class. For the NE/NC region, the production of merchantable volume averaged 263 m3/ha for softwood and 328 m3/ha for hardwood forests with an insignificant volume response from shifting land into more intensive management. Average growth varied widely for INW forest categories from a low on federal land for the base case of 0.7 - 6.7 m3/haha·yr for moist state and private land under the intensive management alternative. Current condition estimates of softwood log and bark carbon exported for mill processing in the INW and NE/NC regions were 751 and 988 kg/ha·yr, respectively.

References

Aber JD, Melillo JM (1991) Terrestrial ecosystems. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, PA. 429 pp.nBattye W, Battye R (2002) Development of emissions inventory methods for wildland fire. Final Report for Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA Contract No 68-D-98-046. February. 77 pp.nBiltonen T (2002) Bennett Lumber, Field Forester, Princeton, ID. Personal interview.nCalkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP (2005) Forest service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends 1970-2002. J Forestry 103(4):179-183.nCORRIM. (1998) Environmental performance research priorities: Wood products, Final report on the research plan to develop environmental performance measures for renewable building materials with alternatives for improved performance, DOE Agreement No. DE-FC07-961D13427, subcontract 417346, CORRIM Inc., Seattle, WA.nFIA (2009) USFS forest inventory and analysis program timber products output online reporting tool. http://srsfia2.fs.fed.us/php/tpo_2009/tpo_rpa_int2.php'>http://srsfia2.fs.fed.us/php/tpo_2009/tpo_rpa_int2.phpnGoedkoop M, deGelder C (2001) SimaPro 5.0 reference manual. PRé Consultants. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.nGoedkoop M, Oele M (2001) SimaPro 5.0 user manual: Introduction to LCA methodology and practice with SimaPro 5.0. PRé Consultants. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.nGraham RT, Harvey AE, Jurgensen MF, Jain TB, Tonn JR, Page-Dumroese DS (1994) Managing coarse woody debris in forests of the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. INT-RP-477. 12 pp.nGrushecky ST, Wang J, McGill DW (2007) Influence of site characteristics and costs of extraction and trucking on logging residue utilization in southern West Virginia. For Prod J 57(7/8):63-67.nHochrein P, Kellogg LD (1988) Production and cost comparison for three skyline thinning systems. West J Appl For 3(4):120-123.nHuyler NK, LeDoux CB (1999) Performance of a cut-to-length harvester in a single-tree and group-selection cut. USDA Forest Service. Res Pap NE-711. 6 pp.nJenkins J C, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49(1):12-35.nJohnson LR, Lippke B, Marshall JD, Comnick J (2005) Life-cycle impacts of forest resource activities in the Pacific Northwest and Southeast United States. Wood Fiber Sci 37(CORRIM Special Issue):30-46.nJorgenson G (2002) Horizon Helicopters, Pilot, Laclede, ID. Personal interview.nKeegan CH, Fiedler C, Stewart F (1995) Cost of timber harvest under traditional and ‘new forestry’ silvicultural prescriptions. West J Appl For 10(1):36-41.nKellogg LD, Bettinger P (1994) Thinning productivity and cost for a mechanized cut-to-length system in the Pacific Coast Region of the USA. J For Eng 5(2):43-54.nKellogg LD, Bettinger P, Edwards R (1996) A comparison of logging planning, felling and skyline yarding costs between clearcutting and five group-selection harvesting methods. West J Appl For 11(3):90-96.nLawson R (2002) Lawson Logging, Owner, Deary, ID. Personal interview.nLedoux C (1984) Production rates and costs of cable yarding wood residue from clearcut units, For Prod J 34 (4):55-60.nLeDoux CB (1985) Stump-to-mill timber production cost equations for cable logging eastern hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Station. Res Pap NE-566. 6 pp.nLeDoux CB (1987) Estimating yarding costs for the Clearwater cable yarder. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Station. Res Pap NE-RP-609. 4 pp.nLeDoux CB, Huyler NK (2001) Comparison of two cut-to-length harvesting systems operating in eastern hardwoods. J For Eng 12(1):53-59.nLippke B, Comnick J, Mason L, Stokes B (2008) Impacts of thinning intensity and implementation schedules on fire, carbon storage, and economics. Pages 47-55 in JR Shelly, ME Puettmann, KE Skog, HS Han, eds. Woody biomass utilization: Challenges and opportunities; 26 June 2006; Newport Beach, CA. Forest Products Soc, Madison, WI.nLong CR (2003) Production and cost analysis of two harvesting systems in central Appalachia. Master thesis. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. 80 pp.nMarshall JD, Waring RH (1986) Comparative methods of estimating leaf area in old-growth Douglas-fir. Ecology 67:975-979.nMcCarter JB, Wilson JS, Baker PJ, Moffett JL, Oliver CD (1998) Landscape management through integration of existing tools and emerging technologies. J Forestry 96 (6):17-23.nMiyata ES (1980) Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep NC-55. 20 pp.nMonserud RA, Marshall JD (1999) Allometric crown relations in three North Idaho conifers. Can J Res 29:521-535.nOneil EE (2006) Developing stand density thresholds to address mountain pine beetle susceptibility in eastern Washington forests. PhD dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 99 pp.nOneil EE, Lippke BR (2010) Integrating products, emission offsets, and wildfire into carbon assessments of inland northwest forests. Wood Fiber Sci 42(CORRIM Special Issue):144-164.nPerez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J, Manriquez C (2005) An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood Fiber Sci 37(CORRIM Special Issue):140-148.nPrichard S, Ottmar R, Anderson G (2006) Consume 3.0 user's guide. Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Seattle, WA. 231 pp.nPuettmann ME, Wagner FG, Johnson L (2010) Life cycle inventory of softwood lumber from the inland northwest US. Wood Fiber Sci 42(CORRIM Special Issue):52-66.nReiginger TW, Gasslgher TV (2001) Evaluation and comparison of two tree-length harvesting systems operating on steep slopes in West Virginia. Pages 56-64 in Proc 24th Annual COFE Meeting; Snowshoe, WV; 15-19 July 2001.nReynolds M (2002) Mike Reynolds Logging, Owner, Priest River, ID. Personal interview.nSchlosser WE, Bassman JH, Wandschneider PR, Everett RL (2003) A carbon balance assessment for containerized Larix gmelinii seedlings in the Russian Far East. For Ecol Manag 173(1-3):335-351.nStevens P, Clarke E (1974) Helicopters for logging; Characteristics, operation, and safety considerations, USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep PNW-20. 16 pp.nSturos JA, Thompson MA, Blinn CR, Dahlman RA (1996) Cable yarding as a low-impact alternative on sensitive sites in the lake states. Pages 109-116 in Proc Papers Presented at the Joint Meeting of the Council on Forest Engineering and International Union of Forest Research Organizations; 29 July-1 August 1996; Marquette, MI.nThompson MA, Sturos JA, Christopherson NS, Sturos JB (1995) Performance and impacts of ground skidding and forwarding from designated trails in an all-age northern hardwood stand. Pages 55-67 in Proc 18th Annual Meeting of the Council on Forest Engineering: Sustainability, Forest Health & Meeting the Nation's Needs for Wood Products; 5-8 June 1995. NC State University, Raleigh, NC.nWang J, Grushecky ST, McNeel J (2005) Production analysis of helicopter logging in West Virginia: A preliminary case study. For Prod J 55(12):71-77.nWang J, Long C, McNeel J, Baumgras J (2004a) Productivity and cost of manual felling and cable skidding in central Appalachian hardwood forests. For Prod J 54 (12):45-51.nWang J, Long C, McNeel J (2004b) Production and cost analysis of a feller-buncher and grapple skidder in central Appalachian hardwood forests. For Prod 54(12):159-167.nWang J, McNeel J (2006) A spreadsheet program for estimating harvesting system rates and costs in Northeastern and North Central regions. Final Technical Report to CORRIM. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 24 pp.nWenny D (2003) Fertilizer treatments of seedlings at the University of Idaho Forest Nursery. Personal communication.nWykoff WR (1986) Supplement to the user's Guide for the Stand Prognosis Model—Version 5.0. Gen Tech Rep INT-281. USDA For Serv Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 40 pp.nWykoff R, Crookston NL, Stage AR (1982) User's guide to the Stand Prognosis Model. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-133. USDA For Serv Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 112 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2010-03-22

Issue

Supplement 1

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.