Use of Advanced Spectroscopic Techniques for Predicting the Mechanical Properties of Wood Composites
Keywords:Near infrared spectroscopy, multivariate analysis, medium-density fiberboard, mechanical properties
AbstractNear infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was used to characterize a set of medium-density fiberboard (MDF) samples. This spectroscopic technique, in combination with projection to latent structures (PLS) modeling, effectively predicted the mechanical strength of MDF samples with a wide range of physical properties. The stiffness, strength, and internal bond properties of the MDF samples could be predicted from the NIR spectra of the MDF surface. The technique is very rapid and provides molecular level insight on subtle changes in the properties of the MDF panels. The results highlight the potential value of NIR spectroscopy for process monitoring and quality control applications.
American Society for Testing Materials. (ASTM). 1999. Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials. ASTM D 1037-99. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nAxrup, L., K. Markides, and T. Nilsson. 2000. Using miniature diode array NIR spectrometers for analyzing wood chips and bark samples in motion. J. Chemometrics 14:561-572.nBucur, V., M. P. Ansell, C. Y. Barlow, J. Pritchard, S. Garros, and X. Deglise. 1998. Physical methods for characterizing wood composite panel products. Holzforschung 52(5):553-561.nChen, L., and F. C. Beall. 2000. Monitoring bond strength development in particleboard during pressing, using acousto-ultrasonics. Wood Fiber Sci. 32(4):466-477.nCurran, P. J., J. L. Dungan, B. A. Macler, S. E. Plummer, and D. L. Peterson. 1992. Reflectance spectroscopy of fresh whole leaves for the estimation of chemical concentration. Remot. Sens. Environ. 39:153-166.nFourty, Th., F. Baret, S. Jacquemoud, G. Schmuck, and J. Verdebout. 1996. Leaf optical properties with explicit description of its biochemical composition: direct and inverse problems. Remot. Sens. Environ. 56:104-117.nHague, J., D. Robson, and M. Riepen. 1999. MDF process variables—An overview of their relative importance. Pages 79-87 in 33rd Inter. Particleboard/Composite Materials Symp. Proc., Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nLister, P. F. 2000. PanelMSR®—A new on-line stiffness tester for structural wood panels. Pages 59-66 in 34th Inter. Particleboard/Composite Materials Symp. Proc., Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nMarcinko, J. L., P. L. Rinaldi, and S. Bao. 1999. Exploring the physicochemical nature of PMDI/wood structural composite adhesion. Forest Prod. J. 49(5): 75-78.nMartens, H., and T. Naes. 1991. Multivariate Calibration. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. 419 pp.nMeder, R., S. Gallagher, K. L. Mackie, H. Bohler, and R. R. Meglen. 1999. Rapid determination of the chemical composition and density of Pinus radiata by PLS modeling of transmission and diffuse reflectance FTIR spectra. Holzforschung 53(3):261-266.nMeglen, R. R. 1988. Chemometrics: Its role in chemistry and measurement sciences. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 3:17-29.nRaymond, C. A., L. R. Schimleck, A. Muneri, and A. J. Mitchell. 2001. Wood Sci. Technol. 35(3):203-215.nRosthauser, J. W., K. W. Haider, R. N. Hunt, and W. S. Gustavich. 1997. Chemistry of PMDI wood binders: Model studies. Pages 161-175 in 31st Inter. Particle-board/Composite Materials Symp. Proc. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nSchimleck, L. R., A. J. Mitchell, C. A. Raymond, and A. Muneri. 1999. Can. J. For. Res. 29(2): 194-201.nSchmidt, R. G., and C. E. Frazier. 2000. Solid-state NMR analysis of adhesive bondlines in pilot scale flakeboards. Wood Fiber Sci. 32(4):419-425.nScott, K. A. 2001. Economic feasibility of implementing a resin distribution measurement system for MDF fiber. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA. 24 pp.nSuchsland O., and G. E. Woodson. 1987. Fiberboard Manufacturing Practices in the United States. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook No. 640, Washington, D.C., pp. 158-160.nVandeginste, B. G. M., D. L. Massart, L. M. C. Buydens, S. De Jong, P. J. Lewi, and J. Smeyers-Verbeke. 1998. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B. Elsevier, New York, pp. 349-379.nWolcott, M. P., and T. G. Rials. 1995. In-situ cure monitoring of isocyanate adhesives using microdielectric analysis. Forest Prod. J. 45(2):72-77.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.