USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING TECHNOLOGY TO EXTRACT VIRTUAL WOOD CORES, DERIVE WOOD DENSITY RADIAL PATTERNS, AND TEST HYPOTHESIS ABOUT DIRECTION, CORE SIZE, AND YEAR OF GROWTH
Keywords:Wood density, computed tomography scanning, virtual wood cores, radial pattern, white spruce, Picea glauca
AbstractComputed tomography (CT) scanning technology was used to collect millions of three-dimensional data called “CT numbers”, on two sets of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) wood disks. Data collected were then converted to wood density estimates using a calibration equation for wood. Virtual wood cores with three different sizes (i.e., 1 voxel – the smallest volumetric unit on which a CT number was computed, 5 mm and 12 mm in diameter) were extracted from pith to bark and in four orthogonal directions. This made it possible to test the effects of core direction and size on the wood density estimates obtained. The average values as well as the radial patterns of wood density as estimated from CT scanning data were found to be typical of the values and patterns reported for the white spruce tree species in the literature, especially in relation to cambial age as the experimental trees were of different ages. In conclusion, wood science application of CT scanning technology allows extracting data subsets in 3D to perform density estimation, pattern analysis and hypothesis testing, and the results are valuable complements to those obtained with other technologies such as X-ray densitometry.
Baltunis BS, Wu HX, Powell MB (2007) Inheritance of density, microfibril angle, and modulus of elasticity in juvenile wood of Pinus radiata at two locations in Australia. Can J For Res 37: 2164-2174.
Beaulieu J (2003) Genetic variation in tracheid length and relationships with growth and wood traits in eastern white spruce (Picea glauca). Wood Fiber Sci 35: 609-616.
Beaulieu J, Doerksen TK, MacKay J, Rainville A, Bousquet J (2014) Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce. BMC Genomics 15: 1048.
Beaulieu J, Doerksen T, Boyle B, Clément S, Deslauriers M, Beauseigle S, Blais S, Poulin P-L, Lenz P, Caron S, Rigault P, Bicho P, Bousquet J, MacKay J (2011) Association genetics of wood physical traits in the conifer white spruce and relationships with gene expression. Genetics 188: 197-214.
Brazier JD, Howell RS (1979) The use of breast-height core for estimating selected whole-tree properties of Sitka spruce. Forestry 52: 177-185.
Bucur V (2003) Nondestructive characterization and imaging of wood. Springer, New York.
Corriveau A, Beaulieu J, Mothe F, Poliquin J, Doucet J (1990) Densité et largeur des cernes des populations d’épinettes blanches de la région forestière des Grands Lacs et du Saint-Laurent. Can J For Res 20: 121-129.
Corriveau A, Beaulieu J, Daoust G (1991) Heritability and genetic correlations of wood characters of Upper Ottawa Valley white spruce populations grown in Quebec. For Chron 67: 698-705.
Cown D, McConchie D, Young G (1991) Radiata pine - wood properties survey. FRI Bull 78: 45-58.
Dutilleul P (2011) Spatio-temporal heterogeneity: concepts and analyses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dutilleul P, Han L, Beaulieu J (2014) How do trees grow? Response from the graphical and quantitative analyses of computed tomography scanning data collected on stem sections. Comment les arbres poussent-ils? Réponse des analyses graphique et quantitative de données de tomodensitométrie pour des sections de la tige. Compte Rendus Biol 337: 391-398.
Evans R, Ilic J (2001) Rapid prediction of wood stiffness from microfibril angle and density. For Prod J. 51: 53-57.
Freyburger C, Longuetaud F, Mothe F, Constant T, Leban J-M (2009) Measuring wood density by means of X-ray computer tomography. Ann For Sci 66: 804-812.
Gonzalez JS (1990) Wood density of Canadian tree species. Forestry Canada. Edmonton, AB, Inf Rep NOR-X-315.
Han L, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Beaulieu C, Smith DL (2008) Assessment of common scab-inducing pathogen effects on potato underground organs via computed tomography scanning. Phytopathology 98: 1118-1125.
Ivkovich M, Namkoong G, Koshy M (2002a) Genetic variation in wood properties of interior spruce. II. Tracheid characteristics. Can J For Res 32: 2128-2139. doi:10.1139/x02-139.
Ivkovich M, Namkoong G, Koshy M (2002b) Genetic variation in wood properties of interior spruce. I. Growth, latewood percentage, and wood density. Can J For Res 32: 2116-2127.
Jessome AP (1977) Strength and related properties of woods grown in Canada. Environ Can, Can For Serv East For Prod Lab, Ottawa, Ontario. For Tech Rep 21.
Kalender WA (2000) Computed tomography. Publicis MCD Verlag, Munich, Germany.
Kibblewhite RP (1999) Designer fibres for improved papers through exploiting genetic variation in wood microstructure. Appita J 52: 429-435.
Kumar S, Dungey HS, Matheson AC (2006) Genetic parameters and strategies for genetic improvement of stiffness in radiata pine. Silvae Genet 55: 77-84.
Larson PR (1962) A biological approach to wood quality. TAPPI 45: 443-448.
Larson PR (1969) Wood formation and the concept of wood quality. Bull 74, Yale University, School of Forestry, New Haven, CT, 54 p.
Larson PR (1994) The vascular cambium: development and structure. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Lenz P, Cloutier A, MacKay J, Beaulieu J (2010) Genetic control of wood properties in Picea glauca – an analysis of trends with cambial age. Can J For Res 40: 703-715.
Lenz P, MacKay J, Rainville A, Cloutier A, Beaulieu J (2011) The influence of cambial age on breeding for wood properties in Picea glauca. Tree Genet Genomes 7: 641-653.
Lenz P, Deslauriers M, Ung C-H, MacKay J, Beaulieu J (2014) What do ecological regions tell us about wood quality? A case study in eastern Canadian white spruce. Can J For Res 44: 1383-1393.
Lindgren LO (1991) The accuracy of medical CAT-scan images for non-destructive density measurements in small volume elements within solid wood. Wood Sci Technol 25: 425-432.
MacDonald E, Hubert J (2002) A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce. Forestry 75: 107-138.
MacKenzie J, Bruemmer G (2009) Enhancing Canada’s forest fibre. For Chron 85: 353-354.
Manceur AM, Beaulieu J, Han L, Dutilleul P (2012) A multidimensional statistical model for wood data analysis, with density estimated from CT scanning data as an example. Can J For Res 42: 1038-1049.
Myszewski JH, Bridgwater FE, Lowe WJ, Byram TD, Megraw RA (2004) Genetic variation in the microfibril angle of loblolly pine from two test sites. South J Appl For 28: 196-204.
Panshin AJ, de Zeeuw C (1980) Textbook of wood technology: Structures, identification, properties and uses of the commercial woods of the United States and Canada. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 722 pp.
Plomion C, Leprovost G, Stokes A (2001) Wood formation in trees. Plant Physiol 127: 1513-1523.
SAS Institute Inc (2008) SAS/STAT software, Version 9.1. 3, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.
Sinnott EW (1952) Reaction wood and the regulation of tree form. Am J Bot 39: 69-78.
Taras MA, Wahlgren HE (1963) A comparison of increment core sampling methods for estimating tree specific gravity. US For Serv, Southern For Exp Stn, Asheville, NC, Res Pap SE-7.
Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, Health LS (2008) The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 32: 1-10.
Wahlgren HE, Fassnacht DL (1959) Estimating tree specific gravity from a single increment core. US For Serv, For Prod Lab, Madison, WI, Rep No 2146.
Wahlgren HE, Hart AC, Maeglin RR (1966) Estimating tree specific gravity of Maine conifers. US For Serv, For Prod Lab, Madison, WI. Res Pap 27.
Williamson GB, Wiemann MC (2010) Measuring wood specific gravity…Correctly. Am J Bot 97: 519-524.
Yanchuk AD, Kiss GK (1993) Genetic variation in growth and wood specific gravity and its utility in the improvement of interior spruce in British Columbia. Silvae Genet 42: 141-148.
Zobel BJ, van Buijtenen JP (1989) Wood variation: its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, New York. 363 pp.
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.