Modeling The Creep Behavior Of Wood Cantilever Loaded At Free End During Drying
Keywords:Cantilever, equilibrium equations, rheological model, wood drying, creep, parameter identification, bending stress, deflection
AbstractA new approach to modeling the creep behavior of a wood cantilever loaded at free end under constant moisture content and under drying conditions is developed. This approach is based on equilibrium equations of cantilever beam theory and allows the computation of stress, strain, and displacement fields through the thickness without any assumption on stress distribution. The analysis is restrained to a modified Burger model that takes into account a moisture content change in wood, although it can be extended to any type of rheological model. In constant hygrothermal conditions, the computed stress field is the same as the one based on equations of elastic cantilever. In drying conditions, a moisture gradient takes place through the thickness, and thus, a nonlinear stress distribution appears and the location of the neutral axis moves away from the geometrical center of the cross-section. The main advantage of the proposed approach is that it can be used to simulate experimental creep bending tests in the presence of moisture content gradients. Accordingly, bending tests should be appropriate to identify both viscoelastic and mechano-sorptive creep parameters.
Batoz, J. L., And G. Dhatt. 1990. Modélisation des structures par éléments finis. Volume 2: Poutres et plaques. Hermès Éditions, Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec. 483 pp.nBengtsson, C. 1999. Mechano-sorptive creep in wood - experimental studies of the influence of material properties. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Structural Engineering, Göteborg, Sweden.nBodig, J., And B. A. Jayne. 1982. Mechanics of wood and wood composites, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY. 712 pp.nCastera, P. 1989. Tensile creep of small wood specimens across the grain under drying conditions. Pages 45-58 in Proc. 2nd International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Seattle, WA.nCech, M. Y. 1964. Development of drying stresses during high-temperature kiln drying. Forest Prod. J. 14(2):69-76.nDahlblom, O., H. Petersson, And S. Omarsson. 2001. Full 3-D FEM-simulations of drying distortions in spruce boards based on experimental studies. Pages 246-251 in Proc. 7th International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Tsukuba, Japan.nFridley, K. J., R. C. Tang, And L. A. Soltis. 1992. Creep behavior model for structural lumber. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 118(8):2261-2277.nGuitard, D. 1987. Mécanique du matériau bois et composites. Éditions CEPADUES, Toulouse, France. 238 pp.nHanhijärvi, A. 1999. Deformation properties of Finnish spruce and pine wood in tangential and radial directions in association to high temperature drying. Part II. Experimental results under constant conditions (viscoelastic creep). Holz Roh-Werkst. 57:365-372.nHanhijärvi, A. 2000. Deformation properties of Finnish spruce and pine wood in tangential and radial directions in association to high temperature drying: Part III. Experimental results under drying conditions (mechano-sorptive creep). Holz Roh-Werkst. 58:63-71.nHaque, M. N., T. A. G. Langrish, L.-B. Keep, And R. B. Keey. 2000. Model fitting for visco-elastic creep of Pinus radiata during kiln drying. Wood Sci. Technol. 34:447-457.nHisada, T. 1979. Creep and set behaviour of wood related to kiln drying. II. Effect of stress level on tensile creep of wood during drying. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 25:697-706.nHisada, T. 1980. Creep and set behaviour of wood related to kiln drying. IV. Effect of stress level on compressive creep and set of wood during drying. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 26:519-526.nHisada, T. 1986. Creep and set behavior of wood related to kiln drying. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute. Report No. 335. Ibaraki, Japan. Pp. 31-130. (In Japanese)nHoyle, R. J. Jr., R. Y. Itani, And J. J. Eckard. 1986. Creep of Douglas-fir beams due to cyclic humidity fluctuations. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(3):468-477.nHunt, D. G. 1997. Dimensional change and creep of spruce, and consequent model requirements. Wood Sci. Technol. 31:3-16.nMårtensson, A. 1988. Tensile behavior of hardboard under combined mechanical and moisture loading. Wood Sci. Technol. 22:129-142.nMårtensson, A. And S. Svensson. 1997. Stress-strain relationship of drying wood. Part I: Development of a constitutive model. Holzforschung 51:472-478.nMcMillen, J. M. 1955. Drying stresses in red oak: Effect of temperature. Forest Prod. J. 5(1):71-76.nMorén, T., S. Margot, And B. Sehlstedt-Persson. 1993. Creep response to drying of timber boards of Scots pine. Forest Prod. J. 43(10): 58-64.nMoutee, M., A. Laghdir, M. Fafard, And Y. Fortin. 2002. A three-dimensional mathematical model of the hygrothermo-mechanical behavior of wood during drying. Pages 179-184 in Proc. Quality Drying: The Key to Profitable Manufacturing, Forest Product Society Conference, Montreal, Qc, Canada.nMuszyński, L., R. Lagana, And S. M. Shaler. 2003. An optical method for characterization of basic hygromechanical properties of solid wood in tension. Pages 230-237 in Proc. 8th International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Brasov, Romania.nOrmarsson S., O. Dahlblom, And H. Petersson. 1999. A numerical study of the shape stability of sawn timber subjected to moisture variation. Part 2: Simulation of drying board. Wood Sci. Technol. 33:407-423.nPang, S. 2001. Modelling of stresses and deformation of radiata pine lumber during drying. Pages 238-245 in Proc. 7th International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Tsukuba, Japan.nPassard, J., And P. Perré. 2001. Creep tests under watersaturated conditions: Do the anisotropy ratios of wood change with the temperature and time dependency? Pages 230-237 in Proc. 7th International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Tsukuba, Japan.nPerré, P. 1996. The numerical modeling of physical and mechanical phenomena involved in wood drying: An excellent tool for assisting with the study of new processes. Pages 11-18 in Proc. 5th International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Québec, Canada.nRanta-Maunus, A. 1975. The viscoelasticity of wood at varying moisture content. Wood Sci. Technol. 9:189-205.nRanta-Maunus, A. 1992. Determination of drying stress in wood when shrinkage is prevented: Test method and modeling. Pages 139-144 in Proc. 3rd International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, Vienna, Austria.nRanta-Maunus, A. 1993. Rheological behaviour of wood in directions perpendicular to the grain. Mater. Struct. 26:362-369.nRice, R. W., And R. L. Youngs. 1990. The mechanism and development of creep during drying of red oak. Holz Roh-Werkst. 48:73-79.nSalin, J. G. 1992. Numerical prediction of checking during timber drying a new mechano-sorptive creep model. Holz Roh-Werkst. 50:195-200.nSenft, J. F., And S. K. Suddarth. 1970. An analysis of creep-inducing stress in Sitka spruce. Wood Fiber Sci. 2(4):321-327.nSimpson, W. T. 1991. Dry kiln operator's manual. Agriculture Handbook No. 188, USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nSvensson, S. 1995. Strain and shrinkage force in wood under kiln drying conditions. I: Measuring strain and shrinkage under controlled climate conditions. Equipment and preliminary results. Holzforschung 49(4):363-368.nSvensson, S. 1996. Strain and shrinkage force in wood under kiln drying conditions. II: Strain, shrinkage and stress measurements under controlled climate conditions. Equipment and preliminary results. Holzforschung 50(5):463-469.nSvensson, S. And T. Toratti. 2002. Mechanical response of wood perpendicular to grain when subjected to changes of humidity. Wood Sci. Technol. 36:145-156.nWu, Q., And M. R. Milota. 1995. Rheological behavior of Douglas-fir perpendicular to the grain at elevated temperature. Wood Fiber Sci. 27(3):285-295.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.