Effects of Pruning on Wood Density and Tracheid Length in Young Douglas-Fir
Keywords:
Pruning, wood density, tracheid length, Douglas-fir, juvenile wood, mature woodAbstract
To study whether pruning young Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco var. menziesii) hastens the transition from juvenile to mature wood, we investigated the effects on wood properties in an intensively managed young plantation in the Coast Range of Oregon. Ten years after trees were pruned to a fixed height (3.4 or 5.5 m), we investigated the effects on wood density (in 12 trees per pruning treatment, two or three treatments per age class, three age classes, and two heights for a total of 168 cores) and tracheid length (in four trees per treatment, one height and age class only, for 12 trees total). The trees were 13, 16, and 18 years old when pruned in 1988. Removal of 50% of the live crown in young trees caused a small one-year decline in growth ring width at breast height, but removal of 30% of the live crown did not. In partial contrast, pruning caused no detectable effect on wood density at breast height, presumably because the branches were in the lower crown, and were not contributing much to the growth of the bole. Pruning caused a small increase in wood density at the upper height (5.3 m) in the youngest age class (for which this 5.5 m pruning would be removing vigorous live branches at this height) but not in the medium age class (for which the pruning would be removing lower live crown at this height) or in the oldest age class (for which there would have been no live branches at 5.5-m). Pruning the youngest trees caused a 3-4 year increase in tracheid length at breast height. In summary, pruning had very small or no effect on growth ring width, density, or tracheid length; but the effects that it had were the ones expected if pruning accelerated the transition from juvenile to mature wood. The larger benefit of pruning, especially if done early in rotation, is to shorten branch healing time and provide for a longer period of clear wood production.References
Bransford, L., and T. T. Munger. 1939. Formation of knots in Douglas fir. USDA Forest Service, PNW Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. USDA Forest Service Research Note 27.nBriggs, D. G. 1995. Pruning in relation to forest inventory, wood quality, and products. Pages 21-35 in D. P. Hanley, C. D. Oliver, D. A. Maguire, D. G. Briggs, and R. D. Fight, eds. Forest Pruning and Wood Quality of Western North American Conifers. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nCown, D. J. 1973. Effects of severe thinning and pruning treatments on the intrinsic wood properties of young radiata pine. NZ J. of Forest Sci. 3:379-389.nDi Lucca, C. M. 1989. Juvenile-mature wood transition. Pages 23-38 in R. M. Kellogg, ed. Second growth Douglas-fir: Its management and conversion for value. Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, B.C.nErnst, S., and T. D. Fahey. 1986. Changes in product recovery of Douglas-fir from old growth to young growth. Pages 103-107 in C. D. Oliver, D. P. Hanley, and J. A. Johnson, eds. Douglas-fir: Stand managment for the future. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nFabris, S. 2000. Influence of cambial ageing, initial spacing, stem taper and growth rate on wood quality of three coastal conifers. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. 250 pp.nFahey, T. D., J. M. Cahill, T. A. Snellgrove, and L. S. Heath. 1991. Lumber and veneer recovery from intensively managed young-growth Douglas-fir. USDA, Forest Serv., Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. Research Paper PNW-RP-437. 25 pp.nFight, R. D., S. Johnson, D. G. Briggs, T. D. Fahey, N. A. Bolon, and J. M. Cahill. 1995. How much timber quality can we afford in coast Douglas-fir stands? Western J. App. For. 10:12-16.nGartner, B. L., E. M. North, G. R. Johnson, and R. Singleton. 2002. Wood density in relation to live crown position in 34-year-old trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii.) Can. J. For. Res. 32:439-447.nGerischer, G. F. R., and A. M. de Villiers. 1963. The effect of heavy pruning on timber properties. Bosbou in Suid-Afrika (Forestry in South Africa) 3:15-35.nJozsa, L. A. 1995. An overview of forest pruning and wood quality in British Columbia. Forest pruning and wood quality. Pages 36-64 in D. P. Hanley, C. D. Oliver, D. A. Maguire, D. G. Briggs, and R. D. Fight, eds. Forest pruning and wood quality of western North American conifers. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nKachin, T. 1939. Natural pruning in second-growth Douglas-fir. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. Research Note No. 31. 5 pp.nKotok, E. S. 1951. Shall we prune to provide peeler logs for the future? The Timberman 52:104-109.nLarson, P. R. 1963. Stem form development of forest trees. For. Sci. Monograph 5:1-42.nMaguire, D. A., and M. D. Petruncio. 1995. Pruning and growth of western cascade species: Douglas-fir, western hemlock, Sitka spruce. Pages 179-215 in D. P. Hanley, C. D. Oliver, D. A. Maguire, D. G. Briggs, and R. D. Fight, eds. Forest pruning and wood quality of western North American conifers. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nMarts, R. O. 1951. Influence of crown reduction on springwood and summerwood distribution in longleaf pine. J. For. 49:183-189.nNewton, M., and E. C. Cole. 1999. Douglas-fir and western hemlock growth under intensive management: Research project annual report. Stand Management Cooperative Meeting, Victoria, B.C., September 23, 1999. 16 pp.nNorthwest Log Rules Advisory Group. 1998. Official Log Scaling and Grading Rules, 8th ed. Columbia River Log Scaling & Grading Bureau, Eugene, OR, 48 pp.nO'Hara, K. L. 1991. A biological justification for pruning in coastal Douglas-fir stands. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 6:59-63.nOliver, C. D., W. Michalec, L. Du Vall, C. A. Wierman, and H. Oswald. 1986. Silvicultural costs of growing Douglas-fir of various spacings, sites, and wood qualities. Pages 132-142 in C. D. Oliver, D. P. Hanley, and J. A. Johnson, eds. Douglas-fir: Stand managment for the future. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nPaul, B. H. 1947. Knots in second growth Douglas-fir. U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. Report No. R1690.nPetruncio, M., D. Briggs, and R. J. Barbour. 1996. Predicting pruned branch stub occlusion in young, coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 27:1074-1082.nPolge, H., R. Keller, and F. Thiercelin. 1973. Influence de l'élegage de branches vivantes sur la structure des accroissements annuels et sur quelques caracteristiques du bois de Douglas et de grandis (Effect of green pruning on ring structure and on certain wood features of Douglas fir and Grand fir; in French). Annales des Sciences Forestières 30:127-140.nRasband, W. 1992. NIH Image 1.47. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.nReukema, D. L. 1959. Missing annual rings in branches of young-growth Douglas-fir. Ecology 4:480-482.nReukema, D. L., and J. H. G. Smith. 1987. Development over 25 years of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar planted at various spacings on a very good site in British Columbia. USDA, Forest Serv., Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-RP-381. 46 pp.nReutebuch, S. E. 1995. Douglas-fir pruning in New Zealand: What can be learned? Pages 265-278 in D. P. Hanley, C. D. Oliver, D. A. Maguire, D. G. Briggs, and R. D. Fight, eds. Forest pruning and wood quality of western North American conifers. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nRiou-Nivert, P. 1989. Douglas, qualités du bois, élegage et sylviculture (Wood quality, pruning, and silviculture of Douglas fir; in French). Revue Forestière Française 41(5):387-410.nScott, W., R. Meade, R. Leon, D. Hyink, and R. Miller. 1998. Planting density and tree size relations in coast Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 28:74-78.nSprugel, D. G., T. M. Hinckley, and W. Schaap. 1991. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Ann. Rev. of Ecol. Systematics 22:309-334.nVarem-Sanders, T. M. L., and I. D. Campbell. 1996. DendroScan: A tree-ring width and density measurement system. Nat. Resour. Can., Can. For. Serv., North. For. Cent., Edmonton, Alberta. Spec. Rep. 10. 131 pp.nWestern Wood Products Association. 1998. Western Lumber Grading Rules. Western Wood Products Association, Portland, OR. 248 pp.nZedaker, S. M. 1981. Growth and development of young Douglas-fir in relation to intra- and inter-specific competition. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 175 pp.nZobel, B. J., and J. P. van Buijtenen. 1989. Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 363 pp.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
